Image Classification and Video Action Recognition are perhaps the two most foundational tasks in computer vision. Consequently, explaining the inner workings of trained deep neural networks is of prime importance. While numerous efforts focus on explaining the decisions of trained deep neural networks in image classification, exploration in the domain of its temporal version, video action recognition, has been scant. In this work, we take a deeper look at this problem. We begin by revisiting Grad-CAM, one of the popular feature attribution methods for Image Classification, and its extension to Video Action Recognition tasks and examine the method's limitations. To address these, we introduce Video-TCAV, by building on TCAV for Image Classification tasks, which aims to quantify the importance of specific concepts in the decision-making process of Video Action Recognition models. As the scalable generation of concepts is still an open problem, we propose a machine-assisted approach to generate spatial and spatiotemporal concepts relevant to Video Action Recognition for testing Video-TCAV. We then establish the importance of temporally-varying concepts by demonstrating the superiority of dynamic spatiotemporal concepts over trivial spatial concepts. In conclusion, we introduce a framework for investigating hypotheses in action recognition and quantitatively testing them, thus advancing research in the explainability of deep neural networks used in video action recognition.
In real-world graph data, distribution shifts can manifest in various ways, such as the emergence of new categories and changes in the relative proportions of existing categories. It is often important to detect nodes of novel categories under such distribution shifts for safety or insight discovery purposes. We introduce a new approach, Recall-Constrained Optimization with Selective Link Prediction (RECO-SLIP), to detect nodes belonging to novel categories in attributed graphs under subpopulation shifts. By integrating a recall-constrained learning framework with a sample-efficient link prediction mechanism, RECO-SLIP addresses the dual challenges of resilience against subpopulation shifts and the effective exploitation of graph structure. Our extensive empirical evaluation across multiple graph datasets demonstrates the superior performance of RECO-SLIP over existing methods.
Data accuracy is essential for scientific research and policy development. The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) data is widely used for discovering the patterns and causes of death. Recent studies suggested the annotation inconsistencies within the NVDRS and the potential impact on erroneous suicide-cause attributions. We present an empirical Natural Language Processing (NLP) approach to detect annotation inconsistencies and adopt a cross-validation-like paradigm to identify problematic instances. We analyzed 267,804 suicide death incidents between 2003 and 2020 from the NVDRS. Our results showed that incorporating the target state's data into training the suicide-crisis classifier brought an increase of 5.4% to the F-1 score on the target state's test set and a decrease of 1.1% on other states' test set. To conclude, we demonstrated the annotation inconsistencies in NVDRS's death investigation notes, identified problematic instances, evaluated the effectiveness of correcting problematic instances, and eventually proposed an NLP improvement solution.
Machine learning methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) facilitate large-scale personalized decision-making across various domains such as healthcare, policy making, education, and more. Current machine learning approaches for HTE require access to substantial amounts of data per treatment, and the high costs associated with interventions makes centrally collecting so much data for each intervention a formidable challenge. To overcome this obstacle, in this work, we propose a novel framework for collaborative learning of HTE estimators across institutions via Federated Learning. We show that even under a diversity of interventions and subject populations across clients, one can jointly learn a common feature representation, while concurrently and privately learning the specific predictive functions for outcomes under distinct interventions across institutions. Our framework and the associated algorithm are based on this insight, and leverage tabular transformers to map multiple input data to feature representations which are then used for outcome prediction via multi-task learning. We also propose a novel way of federated training of personalised transformers that can work with heterogeneous input feature spaces. Experimental results on real-world clinical trial data demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
In several practical applications of federated learning (FL), the clients are highly heterogeneous in terms of both their data and compute resources, and therefore enforcing the same model architecture for each client is very limiting. Moreover, the need for uncertainty quantification and data privacy constraints are often particularly amplified for clients that have limited local data. This paper presents a unified FL framework to simultaneously address all these constraints and concerns, based on training customized local Bayesian models that learn well even in the absence of large local datasets. A Bayesian framework provides a natural way of incorporating supervision in the form of prior distributions. We use priors in the functional (output) space of the networks to facilitate collaboration across heterogeneous clients. Moreover, formal differential privacy guarantees are provided for this framework. Experiments on standard FL datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms strong baselines in both homogeneous and heterogeneous settings and under strict privacy constraints, while also providing characterizations of model uncertainties.
Interpretable entity representations (IERs) are sparse embeddings that are "human-readable" in that dimensions correspond to fine-grained entity types and values are predicted probabilities that a given entity is of the corresponding type. These methods perform well in zero-shot and low supervision settings. Compared to standard dense neural embeddings, such interpretable representations may permit analysis and debugging. However, while fine-tuning sparse, interpretable representations improves accuracy on downstream tasks, it destroys the semantics of the dimensions which were enforced in pre-training. Can we maintain the interpretable semantics afforded by IERs while improving predictive performance on downstream tasks? Toward this end, we propose Intermediate enTity-based Sparse Interpretable Representation Learning (ItsIRL). ItsIRL realizes improved performance over prior IERs on biomedical tasks, while maintaining "interpretability" generally and their ability to support model debugging specifically. The latter is enabled in part by the ability to perform "counterfactual" fine-grained entity type manipulation, which we explore in this work. Finally, we propose a method to construct entity type based class prototypes for revealing global semantic properties of classes learned by our model.
Counterfactual explanations have substantially increased in popularity in the past few years as a useful human-centric way of understanding individual black-box model predictions. While several properties desired of high-quality counterfactuals have been identified in the literature, three crucial concerns: the speed of explanation generation, robustness/sensitivity and succinctness of explanations (sparsity) have been relatively unexplored. In this paper, we present FASTER-CE: a novel set of algorithms to generate fast, sparse, and robust counterfactual explanations. The key idea is to efficiently find promising search directions for counterfactuals in a latent space that is specified via an autoencoder. These directions are determined based on gradients with respect to each of the original input features as well as of the target, as estimated in the latent space. The ability to quickly examine combinations of the most promising gradient directions as well as to incorporate additional user-defined constraints allows us to generate multiple counterfactual explanations that are sparse, realistic, and robust to input manipulations. Through experiments on three datasets of varied complexities, we show that FASTER-CE is not only much faster than other state of the art methods for generating multiple explanations but also is significantly superior when considering a larger set of desirable (and often conflicting) properties. Specifically we present results across multiple performance metrics: sparsity, proximity, validity, speed of generation, and the robustness of explanations, to highlight the capabilities of the FASTER-CE family.
Recent advances in Transformer architecture have empowered its empirical success in various tasks across different domains. However, existing works mainly focus on improving the standard accuracy and computational cost, without considering the robustness of contaminated samples. Existing work has shown that the self-attention mechanism, which is the center of the Transformer architecture, can be viewed as a non-parametric estimator based on the well-known kernel density estimation (KDE). This motivates us to leverage the robust kernel density estimation (RKDE) in the self-attention mechanism, to alleviate the issue of the contamination of data by down-weighting the weight of bad samples in the estimation process. The modified self-attention mechanism can be incorporated into different Transformer variants. Empirical results on language modeling and image classification tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
Three key properties that are desired of trustworthy machine learning models deployed in high-stakes environments are fairness, explainability, and an ability to account for various kinds of "drift". While drifts in model accuracy, for example due to covariate shift, have been widely investigated, drifts in fairness metrics over time remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose FEAMOE, a novel "mixture-of-experts" inspired framework aimed at learning fairer, more explainable/interpretable models that can also rapidly adjust to drifts in both the accuracy and the fairness of a classifier. We illustrate our framework for three popular fairness measures and demonstrate how drift can be handled with respect to these fairness constraints. Experiments on multiple datasets show that our framework as applied to a mixture of linear experts is able to perform comparably to neural networks in terms of accuracy while producing fairer models. We then use the large-scale HMDA dataset and show that while various models trained on HMDA demonstrate drift with respect to both accuracy and fairness, FEAMOE can ably handle these drifts with respect to all the considered fairness measures and maintain model accuracy as well. We also prove that the proposed framework allows for producing fast Shapley value explanations, which makes computationally efficient feature attribution based explanations of model decisions readily available via FEAMOE.
Conformal prediction is a simple and powerful tool that can quantify uncertainty without any distributional assumptions. However, existing methods can only provide an average coverage guarantee, which is not ideal compared to the stronger conditional coverage guarantee. Although achieving exact conditional coverage is proven to be impossible, approximating conditional coverage is still an important research direction. In this paper, we propose a modified non-conformity score by leveraging local approximation of the conditional distribution. The modified score inherits the spirit of split conformal methods, which is simple and efficient compared with full conformal methods but better approximates conditional coverage guarantee. Empirical results on various datasets, including a high dimension age regression on image, demonstrate that our method provides tighter intervals compared to existing methods.