Balancing multiscale similarity and cartographic constraints: A similarity-driven optimization framework for line generalization

Cartographic generalization is essential for generating multiscale map representations by balancing information preservation and cartographic readability. However, automated generalization remains challenging because existing approaches often treat spatial similarity evaluation, cartographic constraints, and parameter optimization as separate processes, limiting adaptive and interpretable control across scales. This study formulates cartographic generalization as a constrained multiscale similarity optimization problem and proposes a similarity-driven framework for adaptive generalization control. The framework integrates multiscale spatial similarity as an optimization objective to quantify representation consistency between original and generalized data, while incorporating cartographic constraints to regulate readability, smoothness, and geometric validity. A unified objective function is optimized to automatically identify scale-dependent parameter configurations for different generalization algorithms. Experiments using multiple line simplification algorithms, target scales, and similarity measures, including geometric, structural, and learning-based metrics, demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves an effective balance between similarity preservation and cartographic abstraction. The results further show that combining similarity optimization with cartographic constraints provides more consistent and interpretable parameter control than relying on similarity evaluation alone. This study provides a unified optimization perspective that connects similarity assessment, constraint modeling, and algorithm control, contributing to adaptive and automated cartographic generalization.

Towards Trustworthy Embodied Intelligence: A Systems Framework and Graded Trustworthiness Levels

Embodied intelligence integrates learned perception and decision making with real-time computation, control, and physical interaction. Because failures can cause immediate physical or operational harm, task completion alone does not establish trustworthiness. We define trustworthy embodied intelligence as the sustained capacity to execute specified tasks reliably under environmental and system variation while maintaining risk within acceptable bounds. We term this objective sustained safe success. Its supporting mechanisms are organized into four interdependent layers. The model layer generates task-competent action proposals with calibrated uncertainty and explicit safety preferences. The system layer realizes authorized actions dependably through integrated sensing, computation, control, hardware safeguards, fault containment, and fallback. The evidence layer substantiates bounded claims through evaluation, verification, validation, traceability, and structured assurance arguments. The deployment layer maintains claim validity through runtime monitoring, authority management, intervention, incident response, and controlled updates. Because assumptions and failures propagate across these layers, neither model capability, isolated safeguards, nor benchmark performance alone can establish end-to-end trustworthiness. Drawing on embodied AI, robotics, control, dependable computing, distributed systems, and autonomous driving, we further propose a non-normative hierarchy of trustworthiness levels. This hierarchy grades the strength of bounded deployment claims across task capability, safety, system assurance, operational governance, and supporting evidence, providing a basis for bounded deployment, comparative evaluation, research prioritization, and future standardization.

RoboDojo: A Unified Sim-and-Real Benchmark for Comprehensive Evaluation of Generalist Robot Manipulation Policies

Generalist robot manipulation policies have advanced rapidly, yet existing benchmarks remain limited in systematically evaluating their capabilities. Many rely on simple, short-horizon, or skill-narrow tasks with limited capability coverage, and are often conducted only in simulation or only in the real world. Simulation enables scalable feedback but misses physical deployment challenges, while real-world evaluation is costly, time-consuming, and difficult to reproduce. We introduce RoboDojo, a unified sim-and-real benchmark for comprehensive evaluation of generalist robot manipulation policies. RoboDojo includes 42 simulation tasks and 18 real-world tasks covering diverse and complementary manipulation capabilities. The simulation benchmark evaluates five dimensions: generalization, memory, precision, long-horizon execution, and open-vocabulary instruction following, while the real-world benchmark exposes policies to challenging physical-world deployment conditions. RoboDojo supports scalable evaluation through heterogeneous parallel simulation in Isaac Sim and provides RoboDojo-RealEval, a reproducible real-world evaluation system with remote cloud access, standardized hardware, scene reset, evaluation protocol, and deployment interface. Together with XPolicyLab, policies can be integrated once and evaluated across simulation and real-world settings with minimal adaptation. We integrate 30 policies into XPolicyLab and evaluate them on RoboDojo, establishing a public leaderboard and systematic analysis of current policy performance. The website is available at http://robodojo-benchmark.com/.