Alert button
Picture for David Hawkes

David Hawkes

Alert button

Evaluation of automated airway morphological quantification for assessing fibrosing lung disease

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Nov 19, 2021
Ashkan Pakzad, Wing Keung Cheung, Kin Quan, Nesrin Mogulkoc, Coline H. M. Van Moorsel, Brian J. Bartholmai, Hendrik W. Van Es, Alper Ezircan, Frouke Van Beek, Marcel Veltkamp, Ronald Karwoski, Tobias Peikert, Ryan D. Clay, Finbar Foley, Cassandra Braun, Recep Savas, Carole Sudre, Tom Doel, Daniel C. Alexander, Peter Wijeratne, David Hawkes, Yipeng Hu, John R Hurst, Joseph Jacob

Figure 1 for Evaluation of automated airway morphological quantification for assessing fibrosing lung disease
Figure 2 for Evaluation of automated airway morphological quantification for assessing fibrosing lung disease
Figure 3 for Evaluation of automated airway morphological quantification for assessing fibrosing lung disease
Figure 4 for Evaluation of automated airway morphological quantification for assessing fibrosing lung disease
Viaarxiv icon

Pre-Quantized Deep Learning Models Codified in ONNX to Enable Hardware/Software Co-Design

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Oct 04, 2021
Ulf Hanebutte, Andrew Baldwin, Senad Durakovic, Igor Filipovich, Chien-Chun, Chou, Damian Adamowicz, Derek Chickles, David Hawkes

Figure 1 for Pre-Quantized Deep Learning Models Codified in ONNX to Enable Hardware/Software Co-Design
Figure 2 for Pre-Quantized Deep Learning Models Codified in ONNX to Enable Hardware/Software Co-Design
Figure 3 for Pre-Quantized Deep Learning Models Codified in ONNX to Enable Hardware/Software Co-Design
Figure 4 for Pre-Quantized Deep Learning Models Codified in ONNX to Enable Hardware/Software Co-Design
Viaarxiv icon

Modelling Airway Geometry as Stock Market Data using Bayesian Changepoint Detection

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Jun 28, 2019
Kin Quan, Ryutaro Tanno, Michael Duong, Arjun Nair, Rebecca Shipley, Mark Jones, Christopher Brereton, John Hurst, David Hawkes, Joseph Jacob

Figure 1 for Modelling Airway Geometry as Stock Market Data using Bayesian Changepoint Detection
Figure 2 for Modelling Airway Geometry as Stock Market Data using Bayesian Changepoint Detection
Figure 3 for Modelling Airway Geometry as Stock Market Data using Bayesian Changepoint Detection
Figure 4 for Modelling Airway Geometry as Stock Market Data using Bayesian Changepoint Detection
Viaarxiv icon

Nonrigid reconstruction of 3D breast surfaces with a low-cost RGBD camera for surgical planning and aesthetic evaluation

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Jan 16, 2019
Rene Lacher, Francisco Vasconcelos, Norman Williams, Gerrit Rindermann, John Hipwell, David Hawkes, Danail Stoyanov

Figure 1 for Nonrigid reconstruction of 3D breast surfaces with a low-cost RGBD camera for surgical planning and aesthetic evaluation
Figure 2 for Nonrigid reconstruction of 3D breast surfaces with a low-cost RGBD camera for surgical planning and aesthetic evaluation
Figure 3 for Nonrigid reconstruction of 3D breast surfaces with a low-cost RGBD camera for surgical planning and aesthetic evaluation
Figure 4 for Nonrigid reconstruction of 3D breast surfaces with a low-cost RGBD camera for surgical planning and aesthetic evaluation
Viaarxiv icon

A Log-Euclidean and Total Variation based Variational Framework for Computational Sonography

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Feb 06, 2018
Jyotirmoy Banerjee, Premal A. Patel, Fred Ushakov, Donald Peebles, Jan Deprest, Sebastien Ourselin, David Hawkes, Tom Vercauteren

Viaarxiv icon

A comparative study of breast surface reconstruction for aesthetic outcome assessment

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Jun 20, 2017
Rene Lacher, Francisco Vasconcelos, David Bishop, Norman Williams, Mohammed Keshtgar, David Hawkes, John Hipwell, Danail Stoyanov

Figure 1 for A comparative study of breast surface reconstruction for aesthetic outcome assessment
Figure 2 for A comparative study of breast surface reconstruction for aesthetic outcome assessment
Figure 3 for A comparative study of breast surface reconstruction for aesthetic outcome assessment
Figure 4 for A comparative study of breast surface reconstruction for aesthetic outcome assessment
Viaarxiv icon