Saarthi for AGI: Towards Domain-Specific General Intelligence for Formal Verification

Saarthi is an agentic AI framework that uses multi-agent collaboration to perform end-to-end formal verification. Even though the framework provides a complete flow from specification to coverage closure, with around 40% efficacy, there are several challenges that need to be addressed to make it more robust and reliable. Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is still a distant goal, and current Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are prone to hallucinations and making mistakes, especially when dealing with complex tasks such as formal verification. However, with the right enhancements and improvements, we believe that Saarthi can be a significant step towards achieving domain-specific general intelligence for formal verification. Especially for problems that require Short Term, Short Context (STSC) capabilities, such as formal verification, Saarthi can be a powerful tool to assist verification engineers in their work. In this paper, we present two key enhancements to the Saarthi framework: (1) a structured rulebook and specification grammar to improve the accuracy and controllability of SystemVerilog Assertion (SVA) generation, and (2) integration of advanced Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques, such as GraphRAG, to provide agents with access to technical knowledge and best practices for iterative refinement and improvement of outputs. We also benchmark these enhancements for the overall Saarthi framework using challenging test cases from NVIDIA's CVDP benchmark targeting formal verification. Our benchmark results stand out with a 70% improvement in the accuracy of generated assertions, and a 50% reduction in the number of iterations required to achieve coverage closure.

Agentic AI-based Coverage Closure for Formal Verification

Coverage closure is a critical requirement in Integrated Chip (IC) development process and key metric for verification sign-off. However, traditional exhaustive approaches often fail to achieve full coverage within project timelines. This study presents an agentic AI-driven workflow that utilizes Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled Generative AI (GenAI) to automate coverage analysis for formal verification, identify coverage gaps, and generate the required formal properties. The framework accelerates verification efficiency by systematically addressing coverage holes. Benchmarking open-source and internal designs reveals a measurable increase in coverage metrics, with improvements correlated to the complexity of the design. Comparative analysis validates the effectiveness of this approach. These results highlight the potential of agentic AI-based techniques to improve formal verification productivity and support comprehensive coverage closure.

FiMI: A Domain-Specific Language Model for Indian Finance Ecosystem

We present FiMI (Finance Model for India), a domain-specialized financial language model developed for Indian digital payment systems. We develop two model variants: FiMI Base and FiMI Instruct. FiMI adapts the Mistral Small 24B architecture through a multi-stage training pipeline, beginning with continuous pre-training on 68 Billion tokens of curated financial, multilingual (English, Hindi, Hinglish), and synthetic data. This is followed by instruction fine-tuning and domain-specific supervised fine-tuning focused on multi-turn, tool-driven conversations that model real-world workflows, such as transaction disputes and mandate lifecycle management. Evaluations reveal that FiMI Base achieves a 20% improvement over the Mistral Small 24B Base model on finance reasoning benchmark, while FiMI Instruct outperforms the Mistral Small 24B Instruct model by 87% on domain-specific tool-calling. Moreover, FiMI achieves these significant domain gains while maintaining comparable performance to models of similar size on general benchmarks.

Hey AI, Generate Me a Hardware Code! Agentic AI-based Hardware Design & Verification

Modern Integrated Circuits (ICs) are becoming increasingly complex, and so is their development process. Hardware design verification entails a methodical and disciplined approach to the planning, development, execution, and sign-off of functionally correct hardware designs. This tedious process requires significant effort and time to ensure a bug-free tape-out. The field of Natural Language Processing has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs). These powerful models, often referred to as Generative AI (GenAI), have revolutionized how machines understand and generate human language, enabling unprecedented advancements in a wide array of applications, including hardware design verification. This paper presents an agentic AI-based approach to hardware design verification, which empowers AI agents, in collaboration with Humain-in-the-Loop (HITL) intervention, to engage in a more dynamic, iterative, and self-reflective process, ultimately performing end-to-end hardware design and verification. This methodology is evaluated on five open-source designs, achieving over 95% coverage with reduced verification time while demonstrating superior performance, adaptability, and configurability.

NTIRE 2025 Challenge on Day and Night Raindrop Removal for Dual-Focused Images: Methods and Results

This paper reviews the NTIRE 2025 Challenge on Day and Night Raindrop Removal for Dual-Focused Images. This challenge received a wide range of impressive solutions, which are developed and evaluated using our collected real-world Raindrop Clarity dataset. Unlike existing deraining datasets, our Raindrop Clarity dataset is more diverse and challenging in degradation types and contents, which includes day raindrop-focused, day background-focused, night raindrop-focused, and night background-focused degradations. This dataset is divided into three subsets for competition: 14,139 images for training, 240 images for validation, and 731 images for testing. The primary objective of this challenge is to establish a new and powerful benchmark for the task of removing raindrops under varying lighting and focus conditions. There are a total of 361 participants in the competition, and 32 teams submitting valid solutions and fact sheets for the final testing phase. These submissions achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the Raindrop Clarity dataset. The project can be found at https://lixinustc.github.io/CVPR-NTIRE2025-RainDrop-Competition.github.io/.

Saarthi: The First AI Formal Verification Engineer

Recently, Devin has made a significant buzz in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community as the world's first fully autonomous AI software engineer, capable of independently developing software code. Devin uses the concept of agentic workflow in Generative AI (GenAI), which empowers AI agents to engage in a more dynamic, iterative, and self-reflective process. In this paper, we present a similar fully autonomous AI formal verification engineer, Saarthi, capable of verifying a given RTL design end-to-end using an agentic workflow. With Saarthi, verification engineers can focus on more complex problems, and verification teams can strive for more ambitious goals. The domain-agnostic implementation of Saarthi makes it scalable for use across various domains such as RTL design, UVM-based verification, and others.

Hard Math -- Easy UVM: Pragmatic solutions for verifying hardware algorithms using UVM

This paper presents pragmatic solutions for verifying complex mathematical algorithms implemented in hardware in an efficient and effective manner. Maximizing leverage of a known-answer-test strategy, based on predefined data scenarios combined with design-for-verification modes, we demonstrate how to find and isolate concept and design bugs early in the flow. The solutions presented are based on real project experience with single chip radar sensors for a variety of applications. The verification environments supporting the presented strategies are based on SystemVerilog and the Universal Verification Methodology.

Verifying Non-friendly Formal Verification Designs: Can We Start Earlier?

The design of Systems on Chips (SoCs) is becoming more and more complex due to technological advancements. Missed bugs can cause drastic failures in safety-critical environments leading to the endangerment of lives. To overcome these drastic failures, formal property verification (FPV) has been applied in the industry. However, there exist multiple hardware designs where the results of FPV are not conclusive even for long runtimes of model-checking tools. For this reason, the use of High-level Equivalence Checking (HLEC) tools has been proposed in the last few years. However, the procedure for how to use it inside an industrial toolchain has not been defined. For this reason, we proposed an automated methodology based on metamodeling techniques which consist of two main steps. First, an untimed algorithmic description written in C++ is verified in an early stage using generated assertions; the advantage of this step is that the assertions at the software level run in seconds and we can start our analysis with conclusive results about our algorithm before starting to write the RTL (Register Transfer Level) design. Second, this algorithmic description is verified against its sequential design using HLEC and the respective metamodel parameters. The results show that the presented methodology can find bugs early related to the algorithmic description and prepare the setup for the HLEC verification. This helps to reduce the verification efforts to set up the tool and write the properties manually which is always error-prone. The proposed framework can help teams working on datapaths to verify and make decisions in an early stage of the verification flow.

FuzzWiz -- Fuzzing Framework for Efficient Hardware Coverage

Ever-increasing design complexity of System-on-Chips (SoCs) led to significant verification challenges. Unlike software, bugs in hardware design are vigorous and eternal i.e., once the hardware is fabricated, it cannot be repaired with any patch. Despite being one of the powerful techniques used in verification, the dynamic random approach cannot give confidence to complex Register Transfer Leve (RTL) designs during the pre-silicon design phase. In particular, achieving coverage targets and exposing bugs is a complicated task with random simulations. In this paper, we leverage an existing testing solution available in the software world known as fuzzing and apply it to hardware verification in order to achieve coverage targets in quick time. We created an automated hardware fuzzing framework FuzzWiz using metamodeling and Python to achieve coverage goals faster. It includes parsing the RTL design module, converting it into C/C++ models, creating generic testbench with assertions, fuzzer-specific compilation, linking, and fuzzing. Furthermore, it is configurable and provides the debug flow if any crash is detected during the fuzzing process. The proposed framework is applied on four IP blocks from Google's OpenTitan chip with various fuzzing engines to show its scalability and compatibility. Our benchmarking results show that we could achieve around 90% of the coverage 10 times faster than traditional simulation regression based approach.

SafeTail: Efficient Tail Latency Optimization in Edge Service Scheduling via Computational Redundancy Management

Optimizing tail latency while efficiently managing computational resources is crucial for delivering high-performance, latency-sensitive services in edge computing. Emerging applications, such as augmented reality, require low-latency computing services with high reliability on user devices, which often have limited computational capabilities. Consequently, these devices depend on nearby edge servers for processing. However, inherent uncertainties in network and computation latencies stemming from variability in wireless networks and fluctuating server loads make service delivery on time challenging. Existing approaches often focus on optimizing median latency but fall short of addressing the specific challenges of tail latency in edge environments, particularly under uncertain network and computational conditions. Although some methods do address tail latency, they typically rely on fixed or excessive redundancy and lack adaptability to dynamic network conditions, often being designed for cloud environments rather than the unique demands of edge computing. In this paper, we introduce SafeTail, a framework that meets both median and tail response time targets, with tail latency defined as latency beyond the 90^th percentile threshold. SafeTail addresses this challenge by selectively replicating services across multiple edge servers to meet target latencies. SafeTail employs a reward-based deep learning framework to learn optimal placement strategies, balancing the need to achieve target latencies with minimizing additional resource usage. Through trace-driven simulations, SafeTail demonstrated near-optimal performance and outperformed most baseline strategies across three diverse services.