Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox

"adversarial": models, code, and papers

Adversarial symmetric GANs: bridging adversarial samples and adversarial networks

Jan 01, 2020
Faqiang Liu, Mingkun Xu, Guoqi Li, Jing Pei, Luping Shi, Rong Zhao

Generative adversarial networks have achieved remarkable performance on various tasks but suffer from training instability. Despite many training strategies proposed to improve training stability, this issue remains as a challenge. In this paper, we investigate the training instability from the perspective of adversarial samples and reveal that adversarial training on fake samples is implemented in vanilla GANs, but adversarial training on real samples has long been overlooked. Consequently, the discriminator is extremely vulnerable to adversarial perturbation and the gradient given by the discriminator contains non-informative adversarial noises, which hinders the generator from catching the pattern of real samples. Here, we develop adversarial symmetric GANs (AS-GANs) that incorporate adversarial training of the discriminator on real samples into vanilla GANs, making adversarial training symmetrical. The discriminator is therefore more robust and provides more informative gradient with less adversarial noise, thereby stabilizing training and accelerating convergence. The effectiveness of the AS-GANs is verified on image generation on CIFAR-10 , CelebA, and LSUN with varied network architectures. Not only the training is more stabilized, but the FID scores of generated samples are consistently improved by a large margin compared to the baseline. The bridging of adversarial samples and adversarial networks provides a new approach to further develop adversarial networks.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Modelling Adversarial Noise for Adversarial Defense

Sep 21, 2021
Dawei Zhou, Nannan Wang, Tongliang Liu, Bo Han

Deep neural networks have been demonstrated to be vulnerable to adversarial noise, promoting the development of defenses against adversarial attacks. Traditionally, adversarial defenses typically focus on directly exploiting adversarial examples to remove adversarial noise or train an adversarially robust target model. Motivated by that the relationship between adversarial data and natural data can help infer clean data from adversarial data to obtain the final correct prediction, in this paper, we study to model adversarial noise to learn the transition relationship in the label space for using adversarial labels to improve adversarial accuracy. Specifically, we introduce a transition matrix to relate adversarial labels and true labels. By exploiting the transition matrix, we can directly infer clean labels from adversarial labels. Then, we propose to employ a deep neural network (i.e., transition network) to model the instance-dependent transition matrix from adversarial noise. In addition, we conduct joint adversarial training on the target model and the transition network to achieve optimal performance. Empirical evaluations on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method could significantly improve adversarial accuracy in comparison to state-of-the-art methods.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Modeling Adversarial Noise for Adversarial Defense

Oct 06, 2021
Dawei Zhou, Nannan Wang, Bo Han, Tongliang Liu

Deep neural networks have been demonstrated to be vulnerable to adversarial noise, promoting the development of defense against adversarial attacks. Motivated by the fact that adversarial noise contains well-generalizing features and that the relationship between adversarial data and natural data can help infer natural data and make reliable predictions, in this paper, we study to model adversarial noise by learning the transition relationship between adversarial labels (i.e. the flipped labels used to generate adversarial data) and natural labels (i.e. the ground truth labels of the natural data). Specifically, we introduce an instance-dependent transition matrix to relate adversarial labels and natural labels, which can be seamlessly embedded with the target model (enabling us to model stronger adaptive adversarial noise). Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our method could effectively improve adversarial accuracy.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Adversarial Training against Location-Optimized Adversarial Patches

May 05, 2020
Sukrut Rao, David Stutz, Bernt Schiele

Deep neural networks have been shown to be susceptible to adversarial examples -- small, imperceptible changes constructed to cause mis-classification in otherwise highly accurate image classifiers. As a practical alternative, recent work proposed so-called adversarial patches: clearly visible, but adversarially crafted rectangular patches in images. These patches can easily be printed and applied in the physical world. While defenses against imperceptible adversarial examples have been studied extensively, robustness against adversarial patches is poorly understood. In this work, we first devise a practical approach to obtain adversarial patches while actively optimizing their location within the image. Then, we apply adversarial training on these location-optimized adversarial patches and demonstrate significantly improved robustness on CIFAR10 and GTSRB. Additionally, in contrast to adversarial training on imperceptible adversarial examples, our adversarial patch training does not reduce accuracy.

* 18 pages, 6 tables, 4 figures, 2 algorithms 

  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustness

Feb 23, 2021
Tao Bai, Jinqi Luo, Jun Zhao, Bihan Wen, Qian Wang

Adversarial training is one of the most effective approaches defending against adversarial examples for deep learning models. Unlike other defense strategies, adversarial training aims to promote the robustness of models intrinsically. During the last few years, adversarial training has been studied and discussed from various aspects. A variety of improvements and developments of adversarial training are proposed, which were, however, neglected in existing surveys. For the first time in this survey, we systematically review the recent progress on adversarial training for adversarial robustness with a novel taxonomy. Then we discuss the generalization problems in adversarial training from three perspectives. Finally, we highlight the challenges which are not fully tackled and present potential future directions.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Transferable Adversarial Robustness using Adversarially Trained Autoencoders

Sep 12, 2019
Pratik Vaishnavi, Kevin Eykholt, Atul Prakash, Amir Rahmati

Machine learning has proven to be an extremely useful tool for solving complex problems in many application domains. This prevalence makes it an attractive target for malicious actors. Adversarial machine learning is a well-studied field of research in which an adversary seeks to cause predicable errors in a machine learning algorithm through careful manipulation of the input. In response, numerous techniques have been proposed to harden machine learning algorithms and mitigate the effect of adversarial attacks. Of these techniques, adversarial training, which augments the training data with adversarial inputs, has proven to be an effective defensive technique. However, adversarial training is computationally expensive and the improvements in adversarial performance are limited to a single model. In this paper, we propose Adversarially-Trained Autoencoder Augmentation, the first transferable adversarial defense that is robust to certain adaptive adversaries. We disentangle adversarial robustness from the classification pipeline by adversarially training an autoencoder with respect to the classification loss. We show that our approach achieves comparable results to state-of-the-art adversarially trained models on the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 datasets. Furthermore, we can transfer our approach to other vulnerable models and improve their adversarial performance without additional training. Finally, we combine our defense with ensemble methods and parallelize adversarial training across multiple vulnerable pre-trained models. In a single adversarial training session, the autoencoder can achieve adversarial performance on the vulnerable models that is comparable or better than standard adversarial training.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Efficient Adversarial Training with Transferable Adversarial Examples

Dec 27, 2019
Haizhong Zheng, Ziqi Zhang, Juncheng Gu, Honglak Lee, Atul Prakash

Adversarial training is an effective defense method to protect classification models against adversarial attacks. However, one limitation of this approach is that it can require orders of magnitude additional training time due to high cost of generating strong adversarial examples during training. In this paper, we first show that there is high transferability between models from neighboring epochs in the same training process, i.e., adversarial examples from one epoch continue to be adversarial in subsequent epochs. Leveraging this property, we propose a novel method, Adversarial Training with Transferable Adversarial Examples (ATTA), that can enhance the robustness of trained models and greatly improve the training efficiency by accumulating adversarial perturbations through epochs. Compared to state-of-the-art adversarial training methods, ATTA enhances adversarial accuracy by up to 7.2% on CIFAR10 and requires 12~14x less training time on MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets with comparable model robustness.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Bridging adversarial samples and adversarial networks

Dec 20, 2019
Faqiang Liu, Mingkun Xu, Guoqi Li, Jing Pei, Luping Shi

Generative adversarial networks have achieved remarkable performance on various tasks but suffer from training instability. In this paper, we investigate this problem from the perspective of adversarial samples. We find that adversarial training on fake samples has been implemented in vanilla GAN but that on real samples does not exist, which makes adversarial training unsymmetric. Consequently, discriminator is vulnerable to adversarial perturbation and the gradient given by discriminator contains uninformative adversarial noise. Adversarial noise can not improve the fidelity of generated samples but can drastically change the prediction of discriminator, which can hinder generator from catching the pattern of real samples and cause instability in training. To this end, we further incorporate adversarial training of discriminator on real samples into vanilla GANs. This scheme can make adversarial training symmetric and make discriminator more robust. Robust discriminator can give more informative gradient with less adversarial noise, which can stabilize training and accelerate convergence. We validate the proposed method on image generation on CIFAR-10 , CelebA, and LSUN with varied network architectures. Experiments show that training is stabilized and FID scores of generated samples are improved by $10\% \sim 50\%$ relative to the baseline with additional $25\%$ computation cost.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Generating Adversarial Examples with Adversarial Networks

Jan 15, 2018
Chaowei Xiao, Bo Li, Jun-Yan Zhu, Warren He, Mingyan Liu, Dawn Song

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been found to be vulnerable to adversarial examples resulting from adding small-magnitude perturbations to inputs. Such adversarial examples can mislead DNNs to produce adversary-selected results. Different attack strategies have been proposed to generate adversarial examples, but how to produce them with high perceptual quality and more efficiently requires more research efforts. In this paper, we propose AdvGAN to generate adversarial examples with generative adversarial networks (GANs), which can learn and approximate the distribution of original instances. For AdvGAN, once the generator is trained, it can generate adversarial perturbations efficiently for any instance, so as to potentially accelerate adversarial training as defenses. We apply AdvGAN in both semi-whitebox and black-box attack settings. In semi-whitebox attacks, there is no need to access the original target model after the generator is trained, in contrast to traditional white-box attacks. In black-box attacks, we dynamically train a distilled model for the black-box model and optimize the generator accordingly. Adversarial examples generated by AdvGAN on different target models have high attack success rate under state-of-the-art defenses compared to other attacks. Our attack has placed the first with 92.76% accuracy on a public MNIST black-box attack challenge.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Improving Global Adversarial Robustness Generalization With Adversarially Trained GAN

Mar 08, 2021
Desheng Wang, Weidong Jin, Yunpu Wu, Aamir Khan

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved beyond human-level accuracy in the image classification task and are widely deployed in real-world environments. However, CNNs show vulnerability to adversarial perturbations that are well-designed noises aiming to mislead the classification models. In order to defend against the adversarial perturbations, adversarially trained GAN (ATGAN) is proposed to improve the adversarial robustness generalization of the state-of-the-art CNNs trained by adversarial training. ATGAN incorporates adversarial training into standard GAN training procedure to remove obfuscated gradients which can lead to a false sense in defending against the adversarial perturbations and are commonly observed in existing GANs-based adversarial defense methods. Moreover, ATGAN adopts the image-to-image generator as data augmentation to increase the sample complexity needed for adversarial robustness generalization in adversarial training. Experimental results in MNIST SVHN and CIFAR-10 datasets show that the proposed method doesn't rely on obfuscated gradients and achieves better global adversarial robustness generalization performance than the adversarially trained state-of-the-art CNNs.

* 17 pages, 7 figures, uses simpleConference.sty 

  Access Paper or Ask Questions

MAT: A Multi-strength Adversarial Training Method to Mitigate Adversarial Attacks

May 11, 2018
Chang Song, Hsin-Pai Cheng, Huanrui Yang, Sicheng Li, Chunpeng Wu, Qing Wu, Hai Li, Yiran Chen

Some recent works revealed that deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to so-called adversarial attacks where input examples are intentionally perturbed to fool DNNs. In this work, we revisit the DNN training process that includes adversarial examples into the training dataset so as to improve DNN's resilience to adversarial attacks, namely, adversarial training. Our experiments show that different adversarial strengths, i.e., perturbation levels of adversarial examples, have different working zones to resist the attack. Based on the observation, we propose a multi-strength adversarial training method (MAT) that combines the adversarial training examples with different adversarial strengths to defend adversarial attacks. Two training structures - mixed MAT and parallel MAT - are developed to facilitate the tradeoffs between training time and memory occupation. Our results show that MAT can substantially minimize the accuracy degradation of deep learning systems to adversarial attacks on MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and SVHN.

* 6 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables 

  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalization

Mar 17, 2020
Saehyung Lee, Hyungyu Lee, Sungroh Yoon

Adversarial examples cause neural networks to produce incorrect outputs with high confidence. Although adversarial training is one of the most effective forms of defense against adversarial examples, unfortunately, a large gap exists between test accuracy and training accuracy in adversarial training. In this paper, we identify Adversarial Feature Overfitting (AFO), which may cause poor adversarially robust generalization, and we show that adversarial training can overshoot the optimal point in terms of robust generalization, leading to AFO in our simple Gaussian model. Considering these theoretical results, we present soft labeling as a solution to the AFO problem. Furthermore, we propose Adversarial Vertex mixup (AVmixup), a soft-labeled data augmentation approach for improving adversarially robust generalization. We complement our theoretical analysis with experiments on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, SVHN, and Tiny ImageNet, and show that AVmixup significantly improves the robust generalization performance and that it reduces the trade-off between standard accuracy and adversarial robustness.

* To appear in CVPR 2020 (Oral) 

  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Adversarial Training: embedding adversarial perturbations into the parameter space of a neural network to build a robust system

Oct 09, 2019
Shixian Wen, Laurent Itti

Adversarial training, in which a network is trained on both adversarial and clean examples, is one of the most trusted defense methods against adversarial attacks. However, there are three major practical difficulties in implementing and deploying this method - expensive in terms of extra memory and computation costs; accuracy trade-off between clean and adversarial examples; and lack of diversity of adversarial perturbations. Classical adversarial training uses fixed, precomputed perturbations in adversarial examples (input space). In contrast, we introduce dynamic adversarial perturbations into the parameter space of the network, by adding perturbation biases to the fully connected layers of deep convolutional neural network. During training, using only clean images, the perturbation biases are updated in the Fast Gradient Sign Direction to automatically create and store adversarial perturbations by recycling the gradient information computed. The network learns and adjusts itself automatically to these learned adversarial perturbations. Thus, we can achieve adversarial training with negligible cost compared to requiring a training set of adversarial example images. In addition, if combined with classical adversarial training, our perturbation biases can alleviate accuracy trade-off difficulties, and diversify adversarial perturbations.


  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Combating Adversaries with Anti-Adversaries

Mar 26, 2021
Motasem Alfarra, Juan C. Pérez, Ali Thabet, Adel Bibi, Philip H. S. Torr, Bernard Ghanem

Deep neural networks are vulnerable to small input perturbations known as adversarial attacks. Inspired by the fact that these adversaries are constructed by iteratively minimizing the confidence of a network for the true class label, we propose the anti-adversary layer, aimed at countering this effect. In particular, our layer generates an input perturbation in the opposite direction of the adversarial one, and feeds the classifier a perturbed version of the input. Our approach is training-free and theoretically supported. We verify the effectiveness of our approach by combining our layer with both nominally and robustly trained models, and conduct large scale experiments from black-box to adaptive attacks on CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet. Our anti-adversary layer significantly enhances model robustness while coming at no cost on clean accuracy.

* 15 pages, 5 figures, 7 tables 

  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Normal vs. Adversarial: Salience-based Analysis of Adversarial Samples for Relation Extraction

Apr 11, 2021
Luoqiu Li, Xiang Chen, Ningyu Zhang, Shumin Deng, Xin Xie, Chuanqi Tan, Mosha Chen, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen

Recent neural-based relation extraction approaches, though achieving promising improvement on benchmark datasets, have reported their vulnerability towards adversarial attacks. Thus far, efforts mostly focused on generating adversarial samples or defending adversarial attacks, but little is known about the difference between normal and adversarial samples. In this work, we take the first step to leverage the salience-based method to analyze those adversarial samples. We observe that salience tokens have a direct correlation with adversarial perturbations. We further find the adversarial perturbations are either those tokens not existing in the training set or superficial cues associated with relation labels. To some extent, our approach unveils the characters against adversarial samples. We release an open-source testbed, "DiagnoseAdv".

* Work in progress 

  Access Paper or Ask Questions