Iterative Semantic Reasoning from Individual to Group Interests for Generative Recommendation with LLMs

Recommendation systems aim to learn user interests from historical behaviors and deliver relevant items. Recent methods leverage large language models (LLMs) to construct and integrate semantic representations of users and items for capturing user interests. However, user behavior theories suggest that truly understanding user interests requires not only semantic integration but also semantic reasoning from explicit individual interests to implicit group interests. To this end, we propose an Iterative Semantic Reasoning Framework (ISRF) for generative recommendation. ISRF leverages LLMs to bridge explicit individual interests and implicit group interests in three steps. First, we perform multi-step bidirectional reasoning over item attributes to infer semantic item features and build a semantic interaction graph capturing users' explicit interests. Second, we generate semantic user features based on the semantic item features and construct a similarity-based user graph to infer the implicit interests of similar user groups. Third, we adopt an iterative batch optimization strategy, where individual explicit interests directly guide the refinement of group implicit interests, while group implicit interests indirectly enhance individual modeling. This iterative process ensures consistent and progressive interest reasoning, enabling more accurate and comprehensive user interest learning. Extensive experiments on the Sports, Beauty, and Toys datasets demonstrate that ISRF outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/htired/ISRF.

Integrating Explainable Machine Learning and Mixed-Integer Optimization for Personalized Sleep Quality Intervention

Sleep quality is influenced by a complex interplay of behavioral, environmental, and psychosocial factors, yet most computational studies focus mainly on predictive risk identification rather than actionable intervention design. Although machine learning models can accurately predict subjective sleep outcomes, they rarely translate predictive insights into practical intervention strategies. To address this gap, we propose a personalized predictive-prescriptive framework that integrates interpretable machine learning with mixed-integer optimization. A supervised classifier trained on survey data predicts sleep quality, while SHAP-based feature attribution quantifies the influence of modifiable factors. These importance measures are incorporated into a mixed-integer optimization model that identifies minimal and feasible behavioral adjustments, while modelling resistance to change through a penalty mechanism. The framework achieves strong predictive performance, with a test F1-score of 0.9544 and an accuracy of 0.9366. Sensitivity and Pareto analyses reveal a clear trade-off between expected improvement and intervention intensity, with diminishing returns as additional changes are introduced. At the individual level, the model generates concise recommendations, often suggesting one or two high-impact behavioral adjustments and sometimes recommending no change when expected gains are minimal. By integrating prediction, explanation, and constrained optimization, this framework demonstrates how data-driven insights can be translated into structured and personalized decision support for sleep improvement.

LLM Routing as Reasoning: A MaxSAT View

Routing a query through an appropriate LLM is challenging, particularly when user preferences are expressed in natural language and model attributes are only partially observable. We propose a constraint-based interpretation of language-conditioned LLM routing, formulating it as a weighted MaxSAT/MaxSMT problem in which natural language feedback induces hard and soft constraints over model attributes. Under this view, routing corresponds to selecting models that approximately maximize satisfaction of feedback-conditioned clauses. Empirical analysis on a 25-model benchmark shows that language feedback produces near-feasible recommendation sets, while no-feedback scenarios reveal systematic priors. Our results suggest that LLM routing can be understood as structured constraint optimization under language-conditioned preferences.

Anchored Alignment: Preventing Positional Collapse in Multimodal Recommender Systems

Multimodal recommender systems (MMRS) leverage images, text, and interaction signals to enrich item representations. However, recent alignment based MMRSs that enforce a unified embedding space often blur modality specific structures and exacerbate ID dominance. Therefore, we propose AnchorRec, a multimodal recommendation framework that performs indirect, anchor based alignment in a lightweight projection domain. By decoupling alignment from representation learning, AnchorRec preserves each modality's native structure while maintaining cross modal consistency and avoiding positional collapse. Experiments on four Amazon datasets show that AnchorRec achieves competitive top N recommendation accuracy, while qualitative analyses demonstrate improved multimodal expressiveness and coherence. The codebase of AnchorRec is available at https://github.com/hun9008/AnchorRec.

Can Fairness Be Prompted? Prompt-Based Debiasing Strategies in High-Stakes Recommendations

Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer sensitive attributes such as gender or age from indirect cues like names and pronouns, potentially biasing recommendations. While several debiasing methods exist, they require access to the LLMs' weights, are computationally costly, and cannot be used by lay users. To address this gap, we investigate implicit biases in LLM Recommenders (LLMRecs) and explore whether prompt-based strategies can serve as a lightweight and easy-to-use debiasing approach. We contribute three bias-aware prompting strategies for LLMRecs. To our knowledge, this is the first study on prompt-based debiasing approaches in LLMRecs that focuses on group fairness for users. Our experiments with 3 LLMs, 4 prompt templates, 9 sensitive attribute values, and 2 datasets show that our proposed debiasing approach, which instructs an LLM to be fair, can improve fairness by up to 74% while retaining comparable effectiveness, but might overpromote specific demographic groups in some cases.

VLM4Rec: Multimodal Semantic Representation for Recommendation with Large Vision-Language Models

Multimodal recommendation is commonly framed as a feature fusion problem, where textual and visual signals are combined to better model user preference. However, the effectiveness of multimodal recommendation may depend not only on how modalities are fused, but also on whether item content is represented in a semantic space aligned with preference matching. This issue is particularly important because raw visual features often preserve appearance similarity, while user decisions are typically driven by higher-level semantic factors such as style, material, and usage context. Motivated by this observation, we propose LVLM-grounded Multimodal Semantic Representation for Recommendation (VLM4Rec), a lightweight framework that organizes multimodal item content through semantic alignment rather than direct feature fusion. VLM4Rec first uses a large vision-language model to ground each item image into an explicit natural-language description, and then encodes the grounded semantics into dense item representations for preference-oriented retrieval. Recommendation is subsequently performed through a simple profile-based semantic matching mechanism over historical item embeddings, yielding a practical offline-online decomposition. Extensive experiments on multiple multimodal recommendation datasets show that VLM4Rec consistently improves performance over raw visual features and several fusion-based alternatives, suggesting that representation quality may matter more than fusion complexity in this setting. The code is released at https://github.com/tyvalencia/enhancing-mm-rec-sys.

A Causal Framework for Mitigating Data Shifts in Healthcare

Developing predictive models that perform reliably across diverse patient populations and heterogeneous environments is a core aim of medical research. However, generalization is only possible if the learned model is robust to statistical differences between data used for training and data seen at the time and place of deployment. Domain generalization methods provide strategies to address data shifts, but each method comes with its own set of assumptions and trade-offs. To apply these methods in healthcare, we must understand how domain shifts arise, what assumptions we prefer to make, and what our design constraints are. This article proposes a causal framework for the design of predictive models to improve generalization. Causality provides a powerful language to characterize and understand diverse domain shifts, regardless of data modality. This allows us to pinpoint why models fail to generalize, leading to more principled strategies to prepare for and adapt to shifts. We recommend general mitigation strategies, discussing trade-offs and highlighting existing work. Our causality-based perspective offers a critical foundation for developing robust, interpretable, and clinically relevant AI solutions in healthcare, paving the way for reliable real-world deployment.

Taming the Long Tail: Efficient Item-wise Sharpness-Aware Minimization for LLM-based Recommender Systems

Large Language Model-based Recommender Systems (LRSs) have recently emerged as a new paradigm in sequential recommendation by directly adopting LLMs as backbones. While LRSs demonstrate strong knowledge utilization and instruction-following abilities, they have not been systematically studied under the long-standing long-tail problem. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study and reveal that LRSs face two distinct types of long-tail: i) prior long-tail, inherited implicitly from pretraining corpora, and ii) data long-tail, originating from skewed recommendation datasets. Our analysis shows that both contribute to the performance disparity between head and tail items, with the intersection of the two heads exhibiting an even stronger head effect. Nevertheless, the overall performance distribution in LRSs, especially on the tail, remains dominated by the data long-tail. To address this challenge, we propose Efficient Item-wise Sharpness-Aware Minimization (EISAM), a novel optimization framework that improves tail-item performance by adaptively regularizing the loss landscape at the item level. EISAM introduces an efficient penalty design that captures fine-grained item-specific sharpness while maintaining computational scalability for LLMs. In addition, we derive a generalization bound for EISAM. Our theoretical analysis shows that the bound decreases at a faster rate under our item-wise regularization, offering theoretical support for its effectiveness. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that EISAM significantly boosts tail-item recommendation performance while preserving overall quality, establishing the first systematic solution to the long-tail problem in LRSs.

Federated Learning and Unlearning for Recommendation with Personalized Data Sharing

Federated recommender systems (FedRS) have emerged as a paradigm for protecting user privacy by keeping interaction data on local devices while coordinating model training through a central server. However, most existing federated recommender systems adopt a one-size-fits-all assumption on user privacy, where all users are required to keep their data strictly local. This setting overlooks users who are willing to share their data with the server in exchange for better recommendation performance. Although several recent studies have explored personalized user data sharing in FedRS, they assume static user privacy preferences and cannot handle user requests to remove previously shared data and its corresponding influence on the trained model. To address this limitation, we propose FedShare, a federated learn-unlearn framework for recommender systems with personalized user data sharing. FedShare not only allows users to control how much interaction data is shared with the server, but also supports data unsharing requests by removing the influence of the unshared data from the trained model. Specifically, FedShare leverages shared data to construct a server-side high-order user-item graph and uses contrastive learning to jointly align local and global representations. In the unlearning phase, we design a contrastive unlearning mechanism that selectively removes representations induced by the unshared data using a small number of historical embedding snapshots, avoiding the need to store large amounts of historical gradient information as required by existing federated recommendation unlearning methods. Extensive experiments on three public datasets demonstrate that FedShare achieves strong recommendation performance in both the learning and unlearning phases, while significantly reducing storage overhead in the unlearning phase compared with state-of-the-art baselines.

Human-Centred LLM Privacy Audits: Findings and Frictions

Large language models (LLMs) learn statistical associations from massive training corpora and user interactions, and deployed systems can surface or infer information about individuals. Yet people lack practical ways to inspect what a model associates with their name. We report interim findings from an ongoing study and introduce LMP2, a browser-based self-audit tool. In two user studies ($N_{total}{=}458$), GPT-4o predicts 11 of 50 features for everyday people with $\ge$60\% accuracy, and participants report wanting control over LLM-generated associations despite not considering all outputs privacy violations. To validate our probing method, we evaluate eight LLMs on public figures and non-existent names, observing clear separation between stable name-conditioned associations and model defaults. Our findings also contribute to exposing a broader generative AI evaluation crisis: when outputs are probabilistic, context-dependent, and user-mediated through elicitation, what model--individual associations even include is under-specified and operationalisation relies on crafting probes and metrics that are hard to validate or compare. To move towards reliable, actionable human-centred LLM privacy audits, we identify nine frictions that emerged in our study and offer recommendations for future work and the design of human-centred LLM privacy audits.