Text classification dataset and analysis for Uzbek language

Text classification is an important task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), where the goal is to categorize text data into predefined classes. In this study, we analyse the dataset creation steps and evaluation techniques of multi-label news categorisation task as part of text classification. We first present a newly obtained dataset for Uzbek text classification, which was collected from 10 different news and press websites and covers 15 categories of news, press and law texts. We also present a comprehensive evaluation of different models, ranging from traditional bag-of-words models to deep learning architectures, on this newly created dataset. Our experiments show that the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based models outperform the rule-based models. The best performance is achieved by the BERTbek model, which is a transformer-based BERT model trained on the Uzbek corpus. Our findings provide a good baseline for further research in Uzbek text classification.

Beyond Toxic: Toxicity Detection Datasets are Not Enough for Brand Safety

The rapid growth in user generated content on social media has resulted in a significant rise in demand for automated content moderation. Various methods and frameworks have been proposed for the tasks of hate speech detection and toxic comment classification. In this work, we combine common datasets to extend these tasks to brand safety. Brand safety aims to protect commercial branding by identifying contexts where advertisements should not appear and covers not only toxicity, but also other potentially harmful content. As these datasets contain different label sets, we approach the overall problem as a binary classification task. We demonstrate the need for building brand safety specific datasets via the application of common toxicity detection datasets to a subset of brand safety and empirically analyze the effects of weighted sampling strategies in text classification.

ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks

Many NLP applications require manual data annotations for a variety of tasks, notably to train classifiers or evaluate the performance of unsupervised models. Depending on the size and degree of complexity, the tasks may be conducted by crowd-workers on platforms such as MTurk as well as trained annotators, such as research assistants. Using a sample of 2,382 tweets, we demonstrate that ChatGPT outperforms crowd-workers for several annotation tasks, including relevance, stance, topics, and frames detection. Specifically, the zero-shot accuracy of ChatGPT exceeds that of crowd-workers for four out of five tasks, while ChatGPT's intercoder agreement exceeds that of both crowd-workers and trained annotators for all tasks. Moreover, the per-annotation cost of ChatGPT is less than $0.003 -- about twenty times cheaper than MTurk. These results show the potential of large language models to drastically increase the efficiency of text classification.

Fairness Evaluation in Text Classification: Machine Learning Practitioner Perspectives of Individual and Group Fairness

Mitigating algorithmic bias is a critical task in the development and deployment of machine learning models. While several toolkits exist to aid machine learning practitioners in addressing fairness issues, little is known about the strategies practitioners employ to evaluate model fairness and what factors influence their assessment, particularly in the context of text classification. Two common approaches of evaluating the fairness of a model are group fairness and individual fairness. We run a study with Machine Learning practitioners (n=24) to understand the strategies used to evaluate models. Metrics presented to practitioners (group vs. individual fairness) impact which models they consider fair. Participants focused on risks associated with underpredicting/overpredicting and model sensitivity relative to identity token manipulations. We discover fairness assessment strategies involving personal experiences or how users form groups of identity tokens to test model fairness. We provide recommendations for interactive tools for evaluating fairness in text classification.

A Multi-Grained Self-Interpretable Symbolic-Neural Model For Single/Multi-Labeled Text Classification

Deep neural networks based on layer-stacking architectures have historically suffered from poor inherent interpretability. Meanwhile, symbolic probabilistic models function with clear interpretability, but how to combine them with neural networks to enhance their performance remains to be explored. In this paper, we try to marry these two systems for text classification via a structured language model. We propose a Symbolic-Neural model that can learn to explicitly predict class labels of text spans from a constituency tree without requiring any access to span-level gold labels. As the structured language model learns to predict constituency trees in a self-supervised manner, only raw texts and sentence-level labels are required as training data, which makes it essentially a general constituent-level self-interpretable classification model. Our experiments demonstrate that our approach could achieve good prediction accuracy in downstream tasks. Meanwhile, the predicted span labels are consistent with human rationales to a certain degree.

Identifying Semantically Difficult Samples to Improve Text Classification

In this paper, we investigate the effect of addressing difficult samples from a given text dataset on the downstream text classification task. We define difficult samples as being non-obvious cases for text classification by analysing them in the semantic embedding space; specifically - (i) semantically similar samples that belong to different classes and (ii) semantically dissimilar samples that belong to the same class. We propose a penalty function to measure the overall difficulty score of every sample in the dataset. We conduct exhaustive experiments on 13 standard datasets to show a consistent improvement of up to 9% and discuss qualitative results to show effectiveness of our approach in identifying difficult samples for a text classification model.

MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection

Nowadays large language models (LLMs) have shown revolutionary power in a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as text classification, sentiment analysis, language translation, and question-answering. In this way, detecting machine-generated texts (MGTs) is becoming increasingly important as LLMs become more advanced and prevalent. These models can generate human-like language that can be difficult to distinguish from text written by a human, which raises concerns about authenticity, accountability, and potential bias. However, existing detection methods against MGTs are evaluated under different model architectures, datasets, and experimental settings, resulting in a lack of a comprehensive evaluation framework across different methodologies In this paper, we fill this gap by proposing the first benchmark framework for MGT detection, named MGTBench. Extensive evaluations on public datasets with curated answers generated by ChatGPT (the most representative and powerful LLMs thus far) show that most of the current detection methods perform less satisfactorily against MGTs. An exceptional case is ChatGPT Detector, which is trained with ChatGPT-generated texts and shows great performance in detecting MGTs. Nonetheless, we note that only a small fraction of adversarial-crafted perturbations on MGTs can evade the ChatGPT Detector, thus highlighting the need for more robust MGT detection methods. We envision that MGTBench will serve as a benchmark tool to accelerate future investigations involving the evaluation of state-of-the-art MGT detection methods on their respective datasets and the development of more advanced MGT detection methods. Our source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/xinleihe/MGTBench.

Borrowing Human Senses: Comment-Aware Self-Training for Social Media Multimodal Classification

Social media is daily creating massive multimedia content with paired image and text, presenting the pressing need to automate the vision and language understanding for various multimodal classification tasks. Compared to the commonly researched visual-lingual data, social media posts tend to exhibit more implicit image-text relations. To better glue the cross-modal semantics therein, we capture hinting features from user comments, which are retrieved via jointly leveraging visual and lingual similarity. Afterwards, the classification tasks are explored via self-training in a teacher-student framework, motivated by the usually limited labeled data scales in existing benchmarks. Substantial experiments are conducted on four multimodal social media benchmarks for image text relation classification, sarcasm detection, sentiment classification, and hate speech detection. The results show that our method further advances the performance of previous state-of-the-art models, which do not employ comment modeling or self-training.

Adopting the Multi-answer Questioning Task with an Auxiliary Metric for Extreme Multi-label Text Classification Utilizing the Label Hierarchy

Extreme multi-label text classification utilizes the label hierarchy to partition extreme labels into multiple label groups, turning the task into simple multi-group multi-label classification tasks. Current research encodes labels as a vector with fixed length which needs establish multiple classifiers for different label groups. The problem is how to build only one classifier without sacrificing the label relationship in the hierarchy. This paper adopts the multi-answer questioning task for extreme multi-label classification. This paper also proposes an auxiliary classification evaluation metric. This study adopts the proposed method and the evaluation metric to the legal domain. The utilization of legal Berts and the study on task distribution are discussed. The experiment results show that the proposed hierarchy and multi-answer questioning task can do extreme multi-label classification for EURLEX dataset. And in minor/fine-tuning the multi-label classification task, the domain adapted BERT models could not show apparent advantages in this experiment. The method is also theoretically applicable to zero-shot learning.

Mask-guided BERT for Few Shot Text Classification

Transformer-based language models have achieved significant success in various domains. However, the data-intensive nature of the transformer architecture requires much labeled data, which is challenging in low-resource scenarios (i.e., few-shot learning (FSL)). The main challenge of FSL is the difficulty of training robust models on small amounts of samples, which frequently leads to overfitting. Here we present Mask-BERT, a simple and modular framework to help BERT-based architectures tackle FSL. The proposed approach fundamentally differs from existing FSL strategies such as prompt tuning and meta-learning. The core idea is to selectively apply masks on text inputs and filter out irrelevant information, which guides the model to focus on discriminative tokens that influence prediction results. In addition, to make the text representations from different categories more separable and the text representations from the same category more compact, we introduce a contrastive learning loss function. Experimental results on public-domain benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of Mask-BERT.