MADE: A Living Benchmark for Multi-Label Text Classification with Uncertainty Quantification of Medical Device Adverse Events

Machine learning in high-stakes domains such as healthcare requires not only strong predictive performance but also reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) to support human oversight. Multi-label text classification (MLTC) is a central task in this domain, yet remains challenging due to label imbalances, dependencies, and combinatorial complexity. Existing MLTC benchmarks are increasingly saturated and may be affected by training data contamination, making it difficult to distinguish genuine reasoning capabilities from memorization. We introduce MADE, a living MLTC benchmark derived from {m}edical device {ad}verse {e}vent reports and continuously updated with newly published reports to prevent contamination. MADE features a long-tailed distribution of hierarchical labels and enables reproducible evaluation with strict temporal splits. We establish baselines across more than 20 encoder- and decoder-only models under fine-tuning and few-shot settings (instruction-tuned/reasoning variants, local/API-accessible). We systematically assess entropy-/consistency-based and self-verbalized UQ methods. Results show clear trade-offs: smaller discriminatively fine-tuned decoders achieve the strongest head-to-tail accuracy while maintaining competitive UQ; generative fine-tuning delivers the most reliable UQ; large reasoning models improve performance on rare labels yet exhibit surprisingly weak UQ; and self-verbalized confidence is not a reliable proxy for uncertainty. Our work is publicly available at https://hhi.fraunhofer.de/aml-demonstrator/made-benchmark.

LLM-Guided Semantic Bootstrapping for Interpretable Text Classification with Tsetlin Machines

Pretrained language models (PLMs) like BERT provide strong semantic representations but are costly and opaque, while symbolic models such as the Tsetlin Machine (TM) offer transparency but lack semantic generalization. We propose a semantic bootstrapping framework that transfers LLM knowledge into symbolic form, combining interpretability with semantic capacity. Given a class label, an LLM generates sub-intents that guide synthetic data creation through a three-stage curriculum (seed, core, enriched), expanding semantic diversity. A Non-Negated TM (NTM) learns from these examples to extract high-confidence literals as interpretable semantic cues. Injecting these cues into real data enables a TM to align clause logic with LLM-inferred semantics. Our method requires no embeddings or runtime LLM calls, yet equips symbolic models with pretrained semantic priors. Across multiple text classification tasks, it improves interpretability and accuracy over vanilla TM, achieving performance comparable to BERT while remaining fully symbolic and efficient.

L2D-Clinical: Learning to Defer for Adaptive Model Selection in Clinical Text Classification

Clinical text classification requires choosing between specialized fine-tuned models (BERT variants) and general-purpose large language models (LLMs), yet neither dominates across all instances. We introduce Learning to Defer for clinical text (L2D-Clinical), a framework that learns when a BERT classifier should defer to an LLM based on uncertainty signals and text characteristics. Unlike prior L2D work that defers to human experts assumed universally superior, our approach enables adaptive deferral-improving accuracy when the LLM complements BERT. We evaluate on two English clinical tasks: (1) ADE detection (ADE Corpus V2), where BioBERT (F1=0.911) outperforms the LLM (F1=0.765), and (2) treatment outcome classification (MIMIC-IV with multi-LLM consensus ground truth), where GPT-5-nano (F1=0.967) outperforms ClinicalBERT (F1=0.887). On ADE, L2D-Clinical achieves F1=0.928 (+1.7 points over BERT) by selectively deferring 7% of instances where the LLM's high recall compensates for BERT's misses. On MIMIC, L2D-Clinical achieves F1=0.980 (+9.3 points over BERT) by deferring only 16.8\% of cases to the LLM. The key insight is that L2D-Clinical learns to selectively leverage LLM strengths while minimizing API costs.

PeerPrism: Peer Evaluation Expertise vs Review-writing AI

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in scientific peer review, assisting with drafting, rewriting, expansion, and refinement. However, existing peer-review LLM detection methods largely treat authorship as a binary problem-human vs. AI-without accounting for the hybrid nature of modern review workflows. In practice, evaluative ideas and surface realization may originate from different sources, creating a spectrum of human-AI collaboration. In this work, we introduce PeerPrism, a large-scale benchmark of 20,690 peer reviews explicitly designed to disentangle idea provenance from text provenance. We construct controlled generation regimes spanning fully human, fully synthetic, and multiple hybrid transformations. This design enables systematic evaluation of whether detectors identify the origin of the surface text or the origin of the evaluative reasoning. We benchmark state-of-the-art LLM text detection methods on PeerPrism. While several methods achieve high accuracy on the standard binary task (human vs. fully synthetic), their predictions diverge sharply under hybrid regimes. In particular, when ideas originate from humans but the surface text is AI-generated, detectors frequently disagree and produce contradictory classifications. Accompanied by stylometric and semantic analyses, our results show that current detection methods conflate surface realization with intellectual contribution. Overall, we demonstrate that LLM detection in peer review cannot be reduced to a binary attribution problem. Instead, authorship must be modeled as a multidimensional construct spanning semantic reasoning and stylistic realization. PeerPrism is the first benchmark evaluating human-AI collaboration in these settings. We release all code, data, prompts, and evaluation scripts to facilitate reproducible research at https://github.com/Reviewerly-Inc/PeerPrism.

Domain Fine-Tuning FinBERT on Finnish Histopathological Reports: Train-Time Signals and Downstream Correlations

In NLP classification tasks where little labeled data exists, domain fine-tuning of transformer models on unlabeled data is an established approach. In this paper we have two aims. (1) We describe our observations from fine-tuning the Finnish BERT model on Finnish medical text data. (2) We report on our attempts to predict the benefit of domain-specific pre-training of Finnish BERT from observing the geometry of embedding changes due to domain fine-tuning. Our driving motivation is the common\situation in healthcare AI where we might experience long delays in acquiring datasets, especially with respect to labels.

OmniGCD: Abstracting Generalized Category Discovery for Modality Agnosticism

Generalized Category Discovery (GCD) challenges methods to identify known and novel classes using partially labeled data, mirroring human category learning. Unlike prior GCD methods, which operate within a single modality and require dataset-specific fine-tuning, we propose a modality-agnostic GCD approach inspired by the human brain's abstract category formation. Our $\textbf{OmniGCD}$ leverages modality-specific encoders (e.g., vision, audio, text, remote sensing) to process inputs, followed by dimension reduction to construct a $\textbf{GCD latent space}$, which is transformed at test-time into a representation better suited for clustering using a novel synthetically trained Transformer-based model. To evaluate OmniGCD, we introduce a $\textbf{zero-shot GCD setting}$ where no dataset-specific fine-tuning is allowed, enabling modality-agnostic category discovery. $\textbf{Trained once on synthetic data}$, OmniGCD performs zero-shot GCD across 16 datasets spanning four modalities, improving classification accuracy for known and novel classes over baselines (average percentage point improvement of $\textbf{+6.2}$, $\textbf{+17.9}$, $\textbf{+1.5}$ and $\textbf{+12.7}$ for vision, text, audio and remote sensing). This highlights the importance of strong encoders while decoupling representation learning from category discovery. Improving modality-agnostic methods will propagate across modalities, enabling encoder development independent of GCD. Our work serves as a benchmark for future modality-agnostic GCD works, paving the way for scalable, human-inspired category discovery. All code is available $\href{https://github.com/Jordan-HS/OmniGCD}{here}$

Identifying and Mitigating Gender Cues in Academic Recommendation Letters: An Interpretability Case Study

Letters of recommendation (LoRs) can carry patterns of implicitly gendered language that can inadvertently influence downstream decisions, e.g. in hiring and admissions. In this work, we investigate the extent to which Transformer-based encoder models as well as Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer the gender of applicants in academic LoRs submitted to an U.S. medical-residency program after explicit identifiers like names and pronouns are de-gendered. While using three models (DistilBERT, RoBERTa, and Llama 2) to classify the gender of anonymized and de-gendered LoRs, significant gender leakage was observed as evident from up to 68% classification accuracy. Text interpretation methods, like TF-IDF and SHAP, demonstrate that certain linguistic patterns are strong proxies for gender, e.g. "emotional'' and "humanitarian'' are commonly associated with LoRs from female applicants. As an experiment in creating truly gender-neutral LoRs, these implicit gender cues were remove resulting in a drop of up to 5.5% accuracy and 2.7% macro $F_1$ score on re-training the classifiers. However, applicant gender prediction still remains better than chance. In this case study, our findings highlight that 1) LoRs contain gender-identifying cues that are hard to remove and may activate bias in decision-making and 2) while our technical framework may be a concrete step toward fairer academic and professional evaluations, future work is needed to interrogate the role that gender plays in LoR review. Taken together, our findings motivate upstream auditing of evaluative text in real-world academic letters of recommendation as a necessary complement to model-level fairness interventions.

MetaDent: Labeling Clinical Images for Vision-Language Models in Dentistry

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in medical image analysis, yet their application in intraoral photography remains largely underexplored due to the lack of fine-grained, annotated datasets and comprehensive benchmarks. To address this, we present MetaDent, a comprehensive resource that includes (1) a novel and large-scale dentistry image dataset collected from clinical, public, and web sources; (2) a semi-structured annotation framework designed to capture the hierarchical and clinically nuanced nature of dental photography; and (3) comprehensive benchmark suites for evaluating state-of-the-art VLMs on clinical image understanding. Our labeling approach combines a high-level image summary with point-by-point, free-text descriptions of abnormalities. This method enables rich, scalable, and task-agnostic representations. We curated 60,669 dental images from diverse sources and annotated a representative subset of 2,588 images using this meta-labeling scheme. Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs), we derive standardized benchmarks: approximately 15K Visual Question Answering (VQA) pairs and an 18-class multi-label classification dataset, which we validated with human review and error analysis to justify that the LLM-driven transition reliably preserves fidelity and semantic accuracy. We then evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs across VQA, classification, and image captioning tasks. Quantitative results reveal that even the most advanced models struggle with a fine-grained understanding of intraoral scenes, achieving moderate accuracy and producing inconsistent or incomplete descriptions in image captioning. We publicly release our dataset, annotations, and tools to foster reproducible research and accelerate the development of vision-language systems for dental applications.

Dynamic Adaptive Attention and Supervised Contrastive Learning: A Novel Hybrid Framework for Text Sentiment Classification

The exponential growth of user-generated movie reviews on digital platforms has made accurate text sentiment classification a cornerstone task in natural language processing. Traditional models, including standard BERT and recurrent architectures, frequently struggle to capture long-distance semantic dependencies and resolve ambiguous emotional expressions in lengthy review texts. This paper proposes a novel hybrid framework that seamlessly integrates dynamic adaptive multi-head attention with supervised contrastive learning into a BERT-based Transformer encoder. The dynamic adaptive attention module employs a global context pooling vector to dynamically regulate the contribution of each attention head, thereby focusing on critical sentiment-bearing tokens while suppressing noise. Simultaneously, the supervised contrastive learning branch enforces tighter intra-class compactness and larger inter-class separation in the embedding space. Extensive experiments on the IMDB dataset demonstrate that the proposed model achieves competitive performance with an accuracy of 94.67\%, outperforming strong baselines by 1.5--2.5 percentage points. The framework is lightweight, efficient, and readily extensible to other text classification tasks.

RUMLEM: A Dictionary-Based Lemmatizer for Romansh

Lemmatization -- the task of mapping an inflected word form to its dictionary form -- is a crucial component of many NLP applications. In this paper, we present RUMLEM, a lemmatizer that covers the five main varieties of Romansh as well as the supra-regional standard variety Rumantsch Grischun. It is based on comprehensive, community-driven morphological databases for Romansh, enabling RUMLEM to cover 77-84% of the words in a typical Romansh text. Since there is a dedicated database for each Romansh variety, an additional application of RUMLEM is variety-aware language classification. Evaluation on 30'000 Romansh texts of varying lengths shows that RUMLEM correctly identifies the variety in 95% of cases. In addition, a proof of concept demonstrates the feasibility of Romansh vs. non-Romansh language classification based on the lemmatizer.