Bit-Flip Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models: Action-Decoding Architecture Shapes the Vulnerability

Quantized Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models expose a weight-fault surface: Rowhammer-style faults can corrupt deployed INT8 bits. We present the first bit-flip attack on a VLA: a few gradient-selected flips reduce closed-loop success to $0\%$, while hundreds of random flips are harmless. Across four model variants spanning three action-head families, damaging bits concentrate in a few action-generating layers, but the empirical budget depends sharply on the head: direct regression and token policies fall in $1$--$5$ flips, whereas the evaluated flow-matching policies require ${\sim}100$--$300$. Our fixed-direction manifold-escape loss cuts \pizero{}'s budget from ${\sim}1000$ to ${\sim}100$ flips, and a matched five-direction sweep shows that the attack is not specific to an all-positive direction. On a direct head, protecting $3.1\%$ of weights preserves $60\%$ success at $K{=}100$, and protecting $5.3\%$ moves the open-loop break threshold from 3 to 100 flips. Finally, task-calibrated emulated $K{=}100$ flips yield $0/20$ real-robot successes, versus $14/20$ clean and $16/20$ global-random. Weight integrity is therefore a security boundary for embodied foundation models. Code is included as ancillary material.

Seed2GS: Camera-Free, Training-Free Object Extraction from 3D Gaussian Scenes via a Single Reference-View Grounding

Extracting a target object from a pre-built 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) scene enables interactive 3D editing. Existing methods either train for tens of minutes per scene, sacrifice accuracy, or require original reconstruction cameras that pre-built assets may not include. We present Seed2GS, which achieves the highest reported LERF-MASK accuracy without original reconstruction cameras or scene-specific representation training. Its key insight is to separate target identity from 3D coverage. QD-SAM3 selects one reliable reference mask from several open-vocabulary candidates, fixing identity once. Seed lift and visibility-adaptive virtual orbits then expose the object from new viewpoints, while tracking propagates the seed without repeated detection. Because the scene remains frozen, these masks supervise only one temporary foreground logit per Gaussian. On LERF-MASK, Seed2GS reaches 92.1% mean intersection over union (mIoU) with a measured compute-only latency of 9.3 seconds, 3.7 points above the strongest scene-trained baseline and 7.6 points above the closest camera-free baseline. With one fixed test reference per scene, the complete pipeline retains 91.1% mIoU; replacing its predicted seed with a ground-truth mask improves mIoU by only 0.72 points. On 3D-OVS, Seed2GS reaches 95.7% mIoU.

Measuring the Permission Gate: A Stress-Test Evaluation of Claude Code's Auto Mode

Claude Code's auto mode is the first deployed permission system for AI coding agents, using a two-stage transcript classifier to gate dangerous tool calls. Anthropic reports a 0.4% false positive rate and 17% false negative rate on production traffic. We present the first independent evaluation of this system on deliberately ambiguous authorization scenarios, i.e., tasks where the user's intent is clear but the target scope, blast radius, or risk level is underspecified. Using AmPermBench, a 128-prompt benchmark spanning four DevOps task families and three controlled ambiguity axes, we evaluate 253 state-changing actions at the individual action level against oracle ground truth. Our findings characterize auto mode's scope-escalation coverage under this stress-test workload. The end-to-end false negative rate is 81.0% (95% CI: 73.8%-87.4%), substantially higher than the 17% reported on production traffic, reflecting a fundamentally different workload rather than a contradiction. Notably, 36.8% of all state-changing actions fall outside the classifier's scope via Tier 2 (in-project file edits), contributing to the elevated end-to-end FNR. Even restricting to the 160 actions the classifier actually evaluates (Tier 3), the FNR remains 70.3%, while the FPR rises to 31.9%. The Tier 2 coverage gap is most pronounced on artifact cleanup (92.9% FNR), where agents naturally fall back to editing state files when the expected CLI is unavailable. These results highlight a coverage boundary worth examining: auto mode assumes dangerous actions transit the shell, but agents routinely achieve equivalent effects through file edits that the classifier does not evaluate.

RepetitionCurse: Measuring and Understanding Router Imbalance in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs under DoS Stress

Mixture-of-Experts architectures have become the standard for scaling large language models due to their superior parameter efficiency. To accommodate the growing number of experts in practice, modern inference systems commonly adopt expert parallelism to distribute experts across devices. However, the absence of explicit load balancing constraints during inference allows adversarial inputs to trigger severe routing concentration. We demonstrate that out-of-distribution prompts can manipulate the routing strategy such that all tokens are consistently routed to the same set of top-$k$ experts, which creates computational bottlenecks on certain devices while forcing others to idle. This converts an efficiency mechanism into a denial-of-service attack vector, leading to violations of service-level agreements for time to first token. We propose RepetitionCurse, a low-cost black-box strategy to exploit this vulnerability. By identifying a universal flaw in MoE router behavior, RepetitionCurse constructs adversarial prompts using simple repetitive token patterns in a model-agnostic manner. On widely deployed MoE models like Mixtral-8x7B, our method increases end-to-end inference latency by 3.063x, degrading service availability significantly.

Taxonomy, Evaluation and Exploitation of IPI-Centric LLM Agent Defense Frameworks

Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents with function-calling capabilities are increasingly deployed, but remain vulnerable to Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) attacks that hijack their tool calls. In response, numerous IPI-centric defense frameworks have emerged. However, these defenses are fragmented, lacking a unified taxonomy and comprehensive evaluation. In this Systematization of Knowledge (SoK), we present the first comprehensive analysis of IPI-centric defense frameworks. We introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of these defenses, classifying them along five dimensions. We then thoroughly assess the security and usability of representative defense frameworks. Through analysis of defensive failures in the assessment, we identify six root causes of defense circumvention. Based on these findings, we design three novel adaptive attacks that significantly improve attack success rates targeting specific frameworks, demonstrating the severity of the flaws in these defenses. Our paper provides a foundation and critical insights for the future development of more secure and usable IPI-centric agent defense frameworks.

SFIBA: Spatial-based Full-target Invisible Backdoor Attacks

Multi-target backdoor attacks pose significant security threats to deep neural networks, as they can preset multiple target classes through a single backdoor injection. This allows attackers to control the model to misclassify poisoned samples with triggers into any desired target class during inference, exhibiting superior attack performance compared with conventional backdoor attacks. However, existing multi-target backdoor attacks fail to guarantee trigger specificity and stealthiness in black-box settings, resulting in two main issues. First, they are unable to simultaneously target all classes when only training data can be manipulated, limiting their effectiveness in realistic attack scenarios. Second, the triggers often lack visual imperceptibility, making poisoned samples easy to detect. To address these problems, we propose a Spatial-based Full-target Invisible Backdoor Attack, called SFIBA. It restricts triggers for different classes to specific local spatial regions and morphologies in the pixel space to ensure specificity, while employing a frequency-domain-based trigger injection method to guarantee stealthiness. Specifically, for injection of each trigger, we first apply fast fourier transform to obtain the amplitude spectrum of clean samples in local spatial regions. Then, we employ discrete wavelet transform to extract the features from the amplitude spectrum and use singular value decomposition to integrate the trigger. Subsequently, we selectively filter parts of the trigger in pixel space to implement trigger morphology constraints and adjust injection coefficients based on visual effects. We conduct experiments on multiple datasets and models. The results demonstrate that SFIBA can achieve excellent attack performance and stealthiness, while preserving the model's performance on benign samples, and can also bypass existing backdoor defenses.

FFCBA: Feature-based Full-target Clean-label Backdoor Attacks

Backdoor attacks pose a significant threat to deep neural networks, as backdoored models would misclassify poisoned samples with specific triggers into target classes while maintaining normal performance on clean samples. Among these, multi-target backdoor attacks can simultaneously target multiple classes. However, existing multi-target backdoor attacks all follow the dirty-label paradigm, where poisoned samples are mislabeled, and most of them require an extremely high poisoning rate. This makes them easily detectable by manual inspection. In contrast, clean-label attacks are more stealthy, as they avoid modifying the labels of poisoned samples. However, they generally struggle to achieve stable and satisfactory attack performance and often fail to scale effectively to multi-target attacks. To address this issue, we propose the Feature-based Full-target Clean-label Backdoor Attacks (FFCBA) which consists of two paradigms: Feature-Spanning Backdoor Attacks (FSBA) and Feature-Migrating Backdoor Attacks (FMBA). FSBA leverages class-conditional autoencoders to generate noise triggers that align perturbed in-class samples with the original category's features, ensuring the effectiveness, intra-class consistency, inter-class specificity and natural-feature correlation of triggers. While FSBA supports swift and efficient attacks, its cross-model attack capability is relatively weak. FMBA employs a two-stage class-conditional autoencoder training process that alternates between using out-of-class samples and in-class samples. This allows FMBA to generate triggers with strong target-class features, making it highly effective for cross-model attacks. We conduct experiments on multiple datasets and models, the results show that FFCBA achieves outstanding attack performance and maintains desirable robustness against the state-of-the-art backdoor defenses.