A Comparison of Robust Kalman Filters for Improving Wheel-Inertial Odometry in Planetary Rovers

This paper compares the performance of adaptive and robust Kalman filter algorithms in improving wheel-inertial odometry on low featured rough terrain. Approaches include classical adaptive and robust methods as well as variational methods, which are evaluated experimentally on a wheeled rover in terrain similar to what would be encountered in planetary exploration. Variational filters show improved solution accuracy compared to the classical adaptive filters and are able to handle erroneous wheel odometry measurements and keep good localization for longer distances without significant drift. We also show how varying the parameters affects localization performance.

Review of Factor Graphs for Robust GNSS Applications

Factor graphs have recently emerged as an alternative solution method for GNSS positioning. In this article, we review how factor graphs are implemented in GNSS, some of their advantages over Kalman Filters, and their importance in making positioning solutions more robust to degraded measurements. We also talk about how factor graphs can be an important tool for the field radio-navigation community.

ZUPT Aided GNSS Factor Graph with Inertial Navigation Integration for Wheeled Robots

In this work, we demonstrate the importance of zero velocity information for global navigation satellite system (GNSS) based navigation. The effectiveness of using the zero velocity information with zero velocity update (ZUPT) for inertial navigation applications have been shown in the literature. Here we leverage this information and add it as a position constraint in a GNSS factor graph. We also compare its performance to a GNSS/inertial navigation system (INS) coupled factor graph. We tested our ZUPT aided factor graph method on three datasets and compared it with the GNSS-only factor graph.

NASA Space Robotics Challenge 2 Qualification Round: An Approach to Autonomous Lunar Rover Operations

Plans for establishing a long-term human presence on the Moon will require substantial increases in robot autonomy and multi-robot coordination to support establishing a lunar outpost. To achieve these objectives, algorithm design choices for the software developments need to be tested and validated for expected scenarios such as autonomous in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), localization in challenging environments, and multi-robot coordination. However, real-world experiments are extremely challenging and limited for extraterrestrial environment. Also, realistic simulation demonstrations in these environments are still rare and demanded for initial algorithm testing capabilities. To help some of these needs, the NASA Centennial Challenges program established the Space Robotics Challenge Phase 2 (SRC2) which consist of virtual robotic systems in a realistic lunar simulation environment, where a group of mobile robots were tasked with reporting volatile locations within a global map, excavating and transporting these resources, and detecting and localizing a target of interest. The main goal of this article is to share our team's experiences on the design trade-offs to perform autonomous robotic operations in a virtual lunar environment and to share strategies to complete the mission requirements posed by NASA SRC2 competition during the qualification round. Of the 114 teams that registered for participation in the NASA SRC2, team Mountaineers finished as one of only six teams to receive the top qualification round prize.