JALMBench: Benchmarking Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in Audio Language Models

Audio Language Models (ALMs) have made significant progress recently. These models integrate the audio modality directly into the model, rather than converting speech into text and inputting text to Large Language Models (LLMs). While jailbreak attacks on LLMs have been extensively studied, the security of ALMs with audio modalities remains largely unexplored. Currently, there is a lack of an adversarial audio dataset and a unified framework specifically designed to evaluate and compare attacks and ALMs. In this paper, we present JALMBench, the \textit{first} comprehensive benchmark to assess the safety of ALMs against jailbreak attacks. JALMBench includes a dataset containing 2,200 text samples and 51,381 audio samples with over 268 hours. It supports 12 mainstream ALMs, 4 text-transferred and 4 audio-originated attack methods, and 5 defense methods. Using JALMBench, we provide an in-depth analysis of attack efficiency, topic sensitivity, voice diversity, and attack representations. Additionally, we explore mitigation strategies for the attacks at both the prompt level and the response level.

Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in human-centered tasks, assessing their psychological traits is crucial for understanding their social impact and ensuring trustworthy AI alignment. While existing reviews have covered some aspects of related research, several important areas have not been systematically discussed, including detailed discussions of diverse psychological tests, LLM-specific psychological datasets, and the applications of LLMs with psychological traits. To address this gap, we systematically review six key dimensions of applying psychological theories to LLMs: (1) assessment tools; (2) LLM-specific datasets; (3) evaluation metrics (consistency and stability); (4) empirical findings; (5) personality simulation methods; and (6) LLM-based behavior simulation. Our analysis highlights both the strengths and limitations of current methods. While some LLMs exhibit reproducible personality patterns under specific prompting schemes, significant variability remains across tasks and settings. Recognizing methodological challenges such as mismatches between psychological tools and LLMs' capabilities, as well as inconsistencies in evaluation practices, this study aims to propose future directions for developing more interpretable, robust, and generalizable psychological assessment frameworks for LLMs.

BadSFL: Backdoor Attack against Scaffold Federated Learning

Federated learning (FL) enables the training of deep learning models on distributed clients to preserve data privacy. However, this learning paradigm is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where malicious clients can upload poisoned local models to embed backdoors into the global model, leading to attacker-desired predictions. Existing backdoor attacks mainly focus on FL with independently and identically distributed (IID) scenarios, while real-world FL training data are typically non-IID. Current strategies for non-IID backdoor attacks suffer from limitations in maintaining effectiveness and durability. To address these challenges, we propose a novel backdoor attack method, BadSFL, specifically designed for the FL framework using the scaffold aggregation algorithm in non-IID settings. BadSFL leverages a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) based on the global model to complement the training set, achieving high accuracy on both backdoor and benign samples. It utilizes a specific feature as the backdoor trigger to ensure stealthiness, and exploits the Scaffold's control variate to predict the global model's convergence direction, ensuring the backdoor's persistence. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the high effectiveness, stealthiness, and durability of BadSFL. Notably, our attack remains effective over 60 rounds in the global model and up to 3 times longer than existing baseline attacks after stopping the injection of malicious updates.