Information Transfer Rate in BCIs: Towards Tightly Integrated Symbiosis

Information Transfer Rate (ITR) is a widely used information measurement metric, particularly popularized for SSVEP-based Brain-Computer (BCI) interfaces. By combining speed and accuracy into a single-valued parameter, this metric aids in the evaluation and comparison of various target identification algorithms across different BCI communities. To accurately depict performance and inspire an end-to-end design for futuristic BCI designs, a more thorough examination and definition of ITR is therefore required. We model the symbiotic communication medium, hosted by the retinogeniculate visual pathway, as a discrete memoryless channel and use the modified capacity expressions to redefine the ITR. We use graph theory to characterize the relationship between the asymmetry of the transition statistics and the ITR gain with the new definition, leading to potential bounds on data rate performance. On two well-known SSVEP datasets, we compared two cutting-edge target identification methods. Results indicate that the induced DM channel asymmetry has a greater impact on the actual perceived ITR than the change in input distribution. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the ITR gain under the new definition is inversely correlated with the asymmetry in the channel transition statistics. Individual input customizations are further shown to yield perceived ITR performance improvements. An algorithm is proposed to find the capacity of binary classification and further discussions are given to extend such results to ensemble techniques.We anticipate that the results of our study will contribute to the characterization of the highly dynamic BCI channel capacities, performance thresholds, and improved BCI stimulus designs for a tighter symbiosis between the human brain and computer systems while enhancing the efficiency of the underlying communication resources.

Neural Correlates of Face Familiarity Perception

In the domain of face recognition, there exists a puzzling timing discrepancy between results from macaque neurophysiology on the one hand and human electrophysiology on the other. Single unit recordings in macaques have demonstrated face identity specific responses in extra-striate visual cortex within 100 milliseconds of stimulus onset. In EEG and MEG experiments with humans, however, a consistent distinction between neural activity corresponding to unfamiliar and familiar faces has been reported to emerge around 250 ms. This points to the possibility that there may be a hitherto undiscovered early correlate of face familiarity perception in human electrophysiological traces. We report here a successful search for such a correlate in dense MEG recordings using pattern classification techniques. Our analyses reveal markers of face familiarity as early as 85 ms after stimulus onset. Low-level attributes of the images, such as luminance and color distributions, are unable to account for this early emerging response difference. These results help reconcile human and macaque data, and provide clues regarding neural mechanisms underlying familiar face perception.

Three approaches to facilitate DNN generalization to objects in out-of-distribution orientations and illuminations: late-stopping, tuning batch normalization and invariance loss

The training data distribution is often biased towards objects in certain orientations and illumination conditions. While humans have a remarkable capability of recognizing objects in out-of-distribution (OoD) orientations and illuminations, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) severely suffer in this case, even when large amounts of training examples are available. In this paper, we investigate three different approaches to improve DNNs in recognizing objects in OoD orientations and illuminations. Namely, these are (i) training much longer after convergence of the in-distribution (InD) validation accuracy, i.e., late-stopping, (ii) tuning the momentum parameter of the batch normalization layers, and (iii) enforcing invariance of the neural activity in an intermediate layer to orientation and illumination conditions. Each of these approaches substantially improves the DNN's OoD accuracy (more than 20% in some cases). We report results in four datasets: two datasets are modified from the MNIST and iLab datasets, and the other two are novel (one of 3D rendered cars and another of objects taken from various controlled orientations and illumination conditions). These datasets allow to study the effects of different amounts of bias and are challenging as DNNs perform poorly in OoD conditions. Finally, we demonstrate that even though the three approaches focus on different aspects of DNNs, they all tend to lead to the same underlying neural mechanism to enable OoD accuracy gains -- individual neurons in the intermediate layers become more selective to a category and also invariant to OoD orientations and illuminations.

To Which Out-Of-Distribution Object Orientations Are DNNs Capable of Generalizing?

The capability of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to recognize objects in orientations outside the distribution of the training data, ie. out-of-distribution (OoD) orientations, is not well understood. For humans, behavioral studies showed that recognition accuracy varies across OoD orientations, where generalization is much better for some orientations than for others. In contrast, for DNNs, it remains unknown how generalization abilities are distributed among OoD orientations. In this paper, we investigate the limitations of DNNs' generalization capacities by systematically inspecting patterns of success and failure of DNNs across OoD orientations. We use an intuitive and controlled, yet challenging learning paradigm, in which some instances of an object category are seen at only a few geometrically restricted orientations, while other instances are seen at all orientations. The effect of data diversity is also investigated by increasing the number of instances seen at all orientations in the training set. We present a comprehensive analysis of DNNs' generalization abilities and limitations for representative architectures (ResNet, Inception, DenseNet and CORnet). Our results reveal an intriguing pattern -- DNNs are only capable of generalizing to instances of objects that appear like 2D, ie. in-plane, rotations of in-distribution orientations.

Is Robustness To Transformations Driven by Invariant Neural Representations?

Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) have demonstrated impressive robustness to recognize objects under transformations (e.g. blur or noise) when these transformations are included in the training set. A hypothesis to explain such robustness is that DCNNs develop invariant neural representations that remain unaltered when the image is transformed. Yet, to what extent this hypothesis holds true is an outstanding question, as including transformations in the training set could lead to properties different from invariance, e.g. parts of the network could be specialized to recognize either transformed or non-transformed images. In this paper, we analyze the conditions under which invariance emerges. To do so, we leverage that invariant representations facilitate robustness to transformations for object categories that are not seen transformed during training. Our results with state-of-the-art DCNNs indicate that invariant representations strengthen as the number of transformed categories in the training set is increased. This is much more prominent with local transformations such as blurring and high-pass filtering, compared to geometric transformations such as rotation and thinning, that entail changes in the spatial arrangement of the object. Our results contribute to a better understanding of invariant representations in deep learning, and the conditions under which invariance spontaneously emerges.