SHRIMP: Iterative Refinement of Robot Task Plans

As collaborative robots have entered domains such as manufacturing, agriculture, and healthcare, programming or adapting robot behavior typically requires robotic expertise that most end users lack. Natural language lowers this barrier. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have made it feasible to translate natural language into robot task plans. However, language-based task specification suffers from semantic ambiguity, and generative models lack transparency for how language instructions become robot actions, making it difficult for users to validate the plan before execution. To address these issues, we introduce SHRIMP, a system that allows users to automatically generate a hierarchical robot primitive plan using natural language and iteratively revise their plan through re-prompting and explicit correction. At each revision, SHRIMP allows users to validate their plan in simulation, and once satisfied, execute it on the physical robot. Through a user study involving participants planning tabletop kitchen tasks (n=35), we validate that SHRIMP improves perceived control and enhances robot transparency. System videos and source code are available at https://wisc-hci.github.io/SHRIMP.

The Long-Horizon Task Mirage? Diagnosing Where and Why Agentic Systems Break

Large language model (LLM) agents perform strongly on short- and mid-horizon tasks, but often break down on long-horizon tasks that require extended, interdependent action sequences. Despite rapid progress in agentic systems, these long-horizon failures remain poorly characterized, hindering principled diagnosis and comparison across domains. To address this gap, we introduce HORIZON, an initial cross-domain diagnostic benchmark for systematically constructing tasks and analyzing long-horizon failure behaviors in LLM-based agents. Using HORIZON, we evaluate state-of-the-art (SOTA) agents from multiple model families (GPT-5 variants and Claude models), collecting 3100+ trajectories across four representative agentic domains to study horizon-dependent degradation patterns. We further propose a trajectory-grounded LLM-as-a-Judge pipeline for scalable and reproducible failure attribution, and validate it with human annotation on trajectories, achieving strong agreement (inter-annotator κ=0.61; human-judge κ=0.84). Our findings offer an initial methodological step toward systematic, cross-domain analysis of long-horizon agent failures and offer practical guidance for building more reliable long-horizon agents. We release our project website at \href{https://xwang2775.github.io/horizon-leaderboard/}{HORIZON Leaderboard} and welcome contributions from the community.