PowerFusion: A Tensor Compiler with Explicit Data Movement Description and Instruction-level Graph IR

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are of critical use in different domains. To accelerate DNN computation, tensor compilers are proposed to generate efficient code on different domain-specific accelerators. Existing tensor compilers mainly focus on optimizing computation efficiency. However, memory access is becoming a key performance bottleneck because the computational performance of accelerators is increasing much faster than memory performance. The lack of direct description of memory access and data dependence in current tensor compilers' intermediate representation (IR) brings significant challenges to generate memory-efficient code. In this paper, we propose IntelliGen, a tensor compiler that can generate high-performance code for memory-intensive operators by considering both computation and data movement optimizations. IntelliGen represent a DNN program using GIR, which includes primitives indicating its computation, data movement, and parallel strategies. This information will be further composed as an instruction-level dataflow graph to perform holistic optimizations by searching different memory access patterns and computation operations, and generating memory-efficient code on different hardware. We evaluate IntelliGen on NVIDIA GPU, AMD GPU, and Cambricon MLU, showing speedup up to 1.97x, 2.93x, and 16.91x(1.28x, 1.23x, and 2.31x on average), respectively, compared to current most performant frameworks.

ReFresh: Reducing Memory Access from Exploiting Stable Historical Embeddings for Graph Neural Network Training

A key performance bottleneck when training graph neural network (GNN) models on large, real-world graphs is loading node features onto a GPU. Due to limited GPU memory, expensive data movement is necessary to facilitate the storage of these features on alternative devices with slower access (e.g. CPU memory). Moreover, the irregularity of graph structures contributes to poor data locality which further exacerbates the problem. Consequently, existing frameworks capable of efficiently training large GNN models usually incur a significant accuracy degradation because of the inevitable shortcuts involved. To address these limitations, we instead propose ReFresh, a general-purpose GNN mini-batch training framework that leverages a historical cache for storing and reusing GNN node embeddings instead of re-computing them through fetching raw features at every iteration. Critical to its success, the corresponding cache policy is designed, using a combination of gradient-based and staleness criteria, to selectively screen those embeddings which are relatively stable and can be cached, from those that need to be re-computed to reduce estimation errors and subsequent downstream accuracy loss. When paired with complementary system enhancements to support this selective historical cache, ReFresh is able to accelerate the training speed on large graph datasets such as ogbn-papers100M and MAG240M by 4.6x up to 23.6x and reduce the memory access by 64.5% (85.7% higher than a raw feature cache), with less than 1% influence on test accuracy.

OLLIE: Derivation-based Tensor Program Optimizer

Boosting the runtime performance of deep neural networks (DNNs) is critical due to their wide adoption in real-world tasks. Existing approaches to optimizing the tensor algebra expression of a DNN only consider expressions representable by a fixed set of predefined operators, missing possible optimization opportunities between general expressions. We propose OLLIE, the first derivation-based tensor program optimizer. OLLIE optimizes tensor programs by leveraging transformations between general tensor algebra expressions, enabling a significantly larger expression search space that includes those supported by prior work as special cases. OLLIE uses a hybrid derivation-based optimizer that effectively combines explorative and guided derivations to quickly discover highly optimized expressions. Evaluation on seven DNNs shows that OLLIE can outperform existing optimizers by up to 2.73$\times$ (1.46$\times$ on average) on an A100 GPU and up to 2.68$\times$ (1.51$\times$) on a V100 GPU, respectively.