SSP: An Event-Matched Syn2Sim2Phy Cross-Domain Evaluation Framework for Autonomous Driving VLA Models

Vision-language-action (VLA) models for autonomous driving jointly produce scene interpretation, language-based reasoning, and driving trajectories. Existing evaluations often use independently selected synthetic, simulated, and physical data, so measured performance gaps can be confounded by changes in scenario content rather than genuine domain sensitivity. We propose SSP (Synthetic-Simulation-Physical), an event-matched Syn2Sim2Phy evaluation framework that anchors cross-domain comparison to the same safety-critical interaction. Starting from a synthetic long-tail video, SSP builds a validated event specification that preserves road topology, participant roles, relative motion, conflict evolution, passing order, response constraints, and event phases. Platform-specific realizations are then constructed in CARLA and on a closed proving ground and are evaluated only after transfer audits confirm preservation of mandatory event properties. SSP maps heterogeneous outputs from OpenEMMA, LLaViDA, and Alpamayo-R1 into common semantic slots and a 1 s trajectory window to assess output validity, semantic accuracy, critical-interaction recognition, trajectory quality, and risk response. Across Cut-in and vulnerable-road-user crossing cases, the macro-averaged Integrated VLA Capability Scores are 0.259, 0.291, and 0.325 in the Synthetic, Simulation, and Physical domains, respectively, while the best domain varies by scenario. Alpamayo-R1, OpenEMMA, and LLaViDA obtain scores of 0.405, 0.338, and 0.131. SSP provides a reproducible scene-transfer chain and an evidence-qualified evaluation of VLA behavior without assuming that the Physical domain is universally superior.

Agents' Last Exam

Recent AI systems have achieved strong results on a wide range of benchmarks, yet these gains have not translated into economically meaningful deployment across many professional domains. We argue that this gap is largely an evaluation problem: widely used benchmarks lack sustained performance measurement on real and economically valuable workflows. This paper introduces Agents' Last Exam (ALE), a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on long-horizon, economically valuable, real-world tasks with verifiable outcomes. Developed in collaboration with 250+ industry experts, ALE covers non-physical industries defined with reference to O*NET / SOC 2018 (the U.S. federal occupational taxonomy). It is organized around a task taxonomy with 55 subfields grouped into 13 industry clusters covering 1K+ tasks. Current results show that the hardest tier remains far from saturated: across mainstream harness and backbone configurations, the average full pass rate is 2.6%. ALE is designed as a living benchmark: its task pool grows continuously as new workflows and industries are onboarded. More broadly, ALE is intended not merely as another leaderboard, but as an instrument for closing the gap between benchmark success and GDP-relevant impact.

An interactive enhanced driving dataset for autonomous driving

The evolution of autonomous driving towards full automation demands robust interactive capabilities; however, the development of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models is constrained by the sparsity of interactive scenarios and inadequate multimodal alignment in existing data. To this end, this paper proposes the Interactive Enhanced Driving Dataset (IEDD). We develop a scalable pipeline to mine million-level interactive segments from naturalistic driving data based on interactive trajectories, and design metrics to quantify the interaction processes. Furthermore, the IEDD-VQA dataset is constructed by generating synthetic Bird's Eye View (BEV) videos where semantic actions are strictly aligned with structured language. Benchmark results evaluating ten mainstream Vision Language Models (VLMs) are provided to demonstrate the dataset's reuse value in assessing and fine-tuning the reasoning capabilities of autonomous driving models.

QuantEval: A Benchmark for Financial Quantitative Tasks in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities across many domains, yet their evaluation in financial quantitative tasks remains fragmented and mostly limited to knowledge-centric question answering. We introduce QuantEval, a benchmark that evaluates LLMs across three essential dimensions of quantitative finance: knowledge-based QA, quantitative mathematical reasoning, and quantitative strategy coding. Unlike prior financial benchmarks, QuantEval integrates a CTA-style backtesting framework that executes model-generated strategies and evaluates them using financial performance metrics, enabling a more realistic assessment of quantitative coding ability. We evaluate some state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary LLMs and observe substantial gaps to human experts, particularly in reasoning and strategy coding. Finally, we conduct large-scale supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning experiments on domain-aligned data, demonstrating consistent improvements. We hope QuantEval will facilitate research on LLMs' quantitative finance capabilities and accelerate their practical adoption in real-world trading workflows. We additionally release the full deterministic backtesting configuration (asset universe, cost model, and metric definitions) to ensure strict reproducibility.