Clinically-Informed Modeling for Pediatric Brain Tumor Classification from Whole-Slide Histopathology Images

Accurate diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors, starting with histopathology, presents unique challenges for deep learning, including severe data scarcity, class imbalance, and fine-grained morphologic overlap across diagnostically distinct subtypes. While pathology foundation models have advanced patch-level representation learning, their effective adaptation to weakly supervised pediatric brain tumor classification under limited data remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce an expert-guided contrastive fine-tuning framework for pediatric brain tumor diagnosis from whole-slide images (WSI). Our approach integrates contrastive learning into slide-level multiple instance learning (MIL) to explicitly regularize the geometry of slide-level representations during downstream fine-tuning. We propose both a general supervised contrastive setting and an expert-guided variant that incorporates clinically informed hard negatives targeting diagnostically confusable subtypes. Through comprehensive experiments on pediatric brain tumor WSI classification under realistic low-sample and class-imbalanced conditions, we demonstrate that contrastive fine-tuning yields measurable improvements in fine-grained diagnostic distinctions. Our experimental analyses reveal complementary strengths across different contrastive strategies, with expert-guided hard negatives promoting more compact intra-class representations and improved inter-class separation. This work highlights the importance of explicitly shaping slide-level representations for robust fine-grained classification in data-scarce pediatric pathology settings.

Automated Thematic Analysis for Clinical Qualitative Data: Iterative Codebook Refinement with Full Provenance

Thematic analysis (TA) is widely used in health research to extract patterns from patient interviews, yet manual TA faces challenges in scalability and reproducibility. LLM-based automation can help, but existing approaches produce codebooks with limited generalizability and lack analytic auditability. We present an automated TA framework combining iterative codebook refinement with full provenance tracking. Evaluated on five corpora spanning clinical interviews, social media, and public transcripts, the framework achieves the highest composite quality score on four of five datasets compared to six baselines. Iterative refinement yields statistically significant improvements on four datasets with large effect sizes, driven by gains in code reusability and distributional consistency while preserving descriptive quality. On two clinical corpora (pediatric cardiology), generated themes align with expert-annotated themes.

PathMoE: Interpretable Multimodal Interaction Experts for Pediatric Brain Tumor Classification

Accurate classification of pediatric central nervous system tumors remains challenging due to histological complexity and limited training data. While pathology foundation models have advanced whole-slide image (WSI) analysis, they often fail to leverage the rich, complementary information found in clinical text and tissue microarchitecture. To this end, we propose PathMoE, an interpretable multimodal framework that integrates H\&E slides, pathology reports, and nuclei-level cell graphs via an interaction-aware mixture-of-experts architecture built on state-of-the-art foundation models for each modality. By training specialized experts to capture modality uniqueness, redundancy, and synergy, PathMoE employs an input-dependent gating mechanism that dynamically weights these interactions, providing sample-level interpretability. We evaluate our framework on two dataset-specific classification tasks on an internal pediatric brain tumor dataset (PBT) and external TCGA datasets. PathMoE improves macro-F1 from 0.762 to 0.799 (+0.037) on PBT when integrating WSI, text, and graph modalities; on TCGA, augmenting WSI with graph knowledge improves macro-F1 from 0.668 to 0.709 (+0.041). These results demonstrate significant performance gains over state-of-the-art image-only baselines while revealing the specific modality interactions driving individual predictions. This interpretability is particularly critical for rare tumor subtypes, where transparent model reasoning is essential for clinical trust and diagnostic validation.

Position: Thematic Analysis of Unstructured Clinical Transcripts with Large Language Models

This position paper examines how large language models (LLMs) can support thematic analysis of unstructured clinical transcripts, a widely used but resource-intensive method for uncovering patterns in patient and provider narratives. We conducted a systematic review of recent studies applying LLMs to thematic analysis, complemented by an interview with a practicing clinician. Our findings reveal that current approaches remain fragmented across multiple dimensions including types of thematic analysis, datasets, prompting strategies and models used, most notably in evaluation. Existing evaluation methods vary widely (from qualitative expert review to automatic similarity metrics), hindering progress and preventing meaningful benchmarking across studies. We argue that establishing standardized evaluation practices is critical for advancing the field. To this end, we propose an evaluation framework centered on three dimensions: validity, reliability, and interpretability.