Generative Social Choice

Traditionally, social choice theory has only been applicable to choices among a few predetermined alternatives but not to more complex decisions such as collectively selecting a textual statement. We introduce generative social choice, a framework that combines the mathematical rigor of social choice theory with large language models' capability to generate text and extrapolate preferences. This framework divides the design of AI-augmented democratic processes into two components: first, proving that the process satisfies rigorous representation guarantees when given access to oracle queries; second, empirically validating that these queries can be approximately implemented using a large language model. We illustrate this framework by applying it to the problem of generating a slate of statements that is representative of opinions expressed as free-form text, for instance in an online deliberative process.

Expressivity of Shallow and Deep Neural Networks for Polynomial Approximation

We analyze the number of neurons that a ReLU neural network needs to approximate multivariate monomials. We establish an exponential lower bound for the complexity of any shallow network that approximates the product function $\vec{x} \to \prod_{i=1}^d x_i$ on a general compact domain. Furthermore, we prove that this lower bound does not hold for normalized O(1)-Lipschitz monomials (or equivalently, by restricting to the unit cube). These results suggest shallow ReLU networks suffer from the curse of dimensionality when expressing functions with a Lipschitz parameter scaling with the dimension of the input, and that the expressive power of neural networks lies in their depth rather than the overall complexity.