Every Cache Entry Earns Its Place: Global Allocation of Resolution and Coverage for KV Cache Compression

As large language models (LLMs) process increasingly long contexts, KV cache storage and repeated access have become a major bottleneck. Existing KV cache compression methods rely on predefined, fixed compression rules and are typically developed around either token eviction or merging. As a result, cache resources can neither flow freely across layers, heads, and context slots, nor be jointly allocated to balance local resolution and information coverage. Therefore, we propose GraceKV, a global approach for the allocation of resolution and coverage in KV cache compression, and formulate the compression process as a global resource allocation problem under a fixed cache budget. GraceKV treats each layer-KV head-slot combination as an atomic unit and builds a prototype tree. Leaf nodes correspond to token-level KV entries, while each internal node uses a single prototype to compress the KV space covered by its children. A set of non-overlapping nodes in the tree forms the representation of an atomic unit. Adding the root of a new tree expands information coverage, whereas splitting a selected node improves local resolution. All candidate actions compete globally for a shared cache budget. Finally, the nodes retained across all trees form the compressed KV cache. This process adaptively determines the allocation of cache resources among atomic units globally and the balance between resolution and coverage. GraceKV requires no additional training, and the entire compression and inference process is performed on the GPU. Systematic experiments across diverse long-context tasks and compression ratios show that GraceKV ranks first in 24 of 32 settings and remains robust up to 128-fold compression. These results validate the effectiveness of global budget allocation in coordinating information coverage and local resolution.

A Two-Tier Perspective on Inference-Time Parallelism in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Large language model (LLM)-driven multi-agent systems typically require multiple model invocations and complex coordination during inference, and their execution strategies directly affect system accuracy, latency, and computational cost. Parallel execution provides a means to improve inference-time efficiency. From the perspective of inference-time execution, this paper models parallelism in multi-agent systems as two distinct levels of decision processes: Replica Parallelism, which explores multiple complete solution paths at the task level, and Structural Parallelism, which enables concurrent execution within a single solution path through task decomposition. However, the roles of different forms of parallelism and their interrelationships still lack systematic study in terms of unified organization and coordination. We therefore propose TIPEX, a controllable execution framework that unifies these two levels of parallelism and coordinates their roles within the inference process under a unified execution semantics while supporting systematic combinations and analyses of different parallel strategies and parameter configurations. Systematic experiments on the GAIA benchmark demonstrate that inference-time parallelism can significantly improve accuracy and reduce end-to-end latency at the cost of increased token consumption. Further analysis shows that Replica and Structural Parallelism exhibit complementary effects across task complexities, with tasks of intermediate difficulty benefiting most from their coordination, while overly aggressive parallel strategies do not necessarily yield better performance.

THEMIS: Towards Holistic Evaluation of MLLMs for Scientific Paper Fraud Forensics

We present THEMIS, a novel multi-task benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on visual fraud reasoning within real-world academic scenarios. Compared to existing benchmarks, THEMIS introduces three major advances. (1) Real-World Scenarios and Complexity: Our benchmark comprises over 4,000 questions spanning seven scenarios, derived from authentic retracted-paper cases and carefully curated multimodal synthetic data. With 60.47% complex-texture images, THEMIS bridges the critical gap between existing benchmarks and the complexity of real-world academic fraud. (2) Fraud-Type Diversity and Granularity: THEMIS systematically covers five challenging fraud types and introduces 16 fine-grained manipulation operations. On average, each sample undergoes multiple stacked manipulation operations, with the diversity and difficulty of these manipulations demanding a high level of visual fraud reasoning from the models. (3) Multi-Dimensional Capability Evaluation: We establish a mapping from fraud types to five core visual fraud reasoning capabilities, thereby enabling an evaluation that reveals the distinct strengths and specific weaknesses of different models across these core capabilities. Experiments on 16 leading MLLMs show that even the best-performing model, GPT-5, achieves an overall performance of only 56.15%, demonstrating that our benchmark presents a stringent test. We expect THEMIS to advance the development of MLLMs for complex, real-world fraud reasoning tasks.

FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step Computation

We introduce FinMMDocR, a novel bilingual multimodal benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on real-world financial numerical reasoning. Compared to existing benchmarks, our work delivers three major advancements. (1) Scenario Awareness: 57.9% of 1,200 expert-annotated problems incorporate 12 types of implicit financial scenarios (e.g., Portfolio Management), challenging models to perform expert-level reasoning based on assumptions; (2) Document Understanding: 837 Chinese/English documents spanning 9 types (e.g., Company Research) average 50.8 pages with rich visual elements, significantly surpassing existing benchmarks in both breadth and depth of financial documents; (3) Multi-Step Computation: Problems demand 11-step reasoning on average (5.3 extraction + 5.7 calculation steps), with 65.0% requiring cross-page evidence (2.4 pages average). The best-performing MLLM achieves only 58.0% accuracy, and different retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods show significant performance variations on this task. We expect FinMMDocR to drive improvements in MLLMs and reasoning-enhanced methods on complex multimodal reasoning tasks in real-world scenarios.