Distilling Adversarial Robustness Using Heterogeneous Teachers

Achieving resiliency against adversarial attacks is necessary prior to deploying neural network classifiers in domains where misclassification incurs substantial costs, e.g., self-driving cars or medical imaging. Recent work has demonstrated that robustness can be transferred from an adversarially trained teacher to a student model using knowledge distillation. However, current methods perform distillation using a single adversarial and vanilla teacher and consider homogeneous architectures (i.e., residual networks) that are susceptible to misclassify examples from similar adversarial subspaces. In this work, we develop a defense framework against adversarial attacks by distilling adversarial robustness using heterogeneous teachers (DARHT). In DARHT, the student model explicitly represents teacher logits in a student-teacher feature map and leverages multiple teachers that exhibit low adversarial example transferability (i.e., exhibit high performance on dissimilar adversarial examples). Experiments on classification tasks in both white-box and black-box scenarios demonstrate that DARHT achieves state-of-the-art clean and robust accuracies when compared to competing adversarial training and distillation methods in the CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet datasets. Comparisons with homogeneous and heterogeneous teacher sets suggest that leveraging teachers with low adversarial example transferability increases student model robustness.

Game Theoretic Mixed Experts for Combinational Adversarial Machine Learning

Recent advances in adversarial machine learning have shown that defenses considered to be robust are actually susceptible to adversarial attacks which are specifically tailored to target their weaknesses. These defenses include Barrage of Random Transforms (BaRT), Friendly Adversarial Training (FAT), Trash is Treasure (TiT) and ensemble models made up of Vision Transformers (ViTs), Big Transfer models and Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs). A natural question arises: how can one best leverage a combination of adversarial defenses to thwart such attacks? In this paper, we provide a game-theoretic framework for ensemble adversarial attacks and defenses which answers this question. In addition to our framework we produce the first adversarial defense transferability study to further motivate a need for combinational defenses utilizing a diverse set of defense architectures. Our framework is called Game theoretic Mixed Experts (GaME) and is designed to find the Mixed-Nash strategy for a defender when facing an attacker employing compositional adversarial attacks. We show that this framework creates an ensemble of defenses with greater robustness than multiple state-of-the-art, single-model defenses in addition to combinational defenses with uniform probability distributions. Overall, our framework and analyses advance the field of adversarial machine learning by yielding new insights into compositional attack and defense formulations.

Securing the Spike: On the Transferabilty and Security of Spiking Neural Networks to Adversarial Examples

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have attracted much attention for their high energy efficiency and for recent advances in their classification performance. However, unlike traditional deep learning approaches, the analysis and study of the robustness of SNNs to adversarial examples remains relatively underdeveloped. In this work we advance the field of adversarial machine learning through experimentation and analyses of three important SNN security attributes. First, we show that successful white-box adversarial attacks on SNNs are highly dependent on the underlying surrogate gradient technique. Second, we analyze the transferability of adversarial examples generated by SNNs and other state-of-the-art architectures like Vision Transformers and Big Transfer CNNs. We demonstrate that SNNs are not often deceived by adversarial examples generated by Vision Transformers and certain types of CNNs. Lastly, we develop a novel white-box attack that generates adversarial examples capable of fooling both SNN models and non-SNN models simultaneously. Our experiments and analyses are broad and rigorous covering two datasets (CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100), five different white-box attacks and twelve different classifier models.

Back in Black: A Comparative Evaluation of Recent State-Of-The-Art Black-Box Attacks

The field of adversarial machine learning has experienced a near exponential growth in the amount of papers being produced since 2018. This massive information output has yet to be properly processed and categorized. In this paper, we seek to help alleviate this problem by systematizing the recent advances in adversarial machine learning black-box attacks since 2019. Our survey summarizes and categorizes 20 recent black-box attacks. We also present a new analysis for understanding the attack success rate with respect to the adversarial model used in each paper. Overall, our paper surveys a wide body of literature to highlight recent attack developments and organizes them into four attack categories: score based attacks, decision based attacks, transfer attacks and non-traditional attacks. Further, we provide a new mathematical framework to show exactly how attack results can fairly be compared.