Beyond Self-Play and Scale: A Behavior Benchmark for Generalization in Autonomous Driving

Recent Autonomous Driving (AD) works such as GigaFlow and PufferDrive have unlocked Reinforcement Learning (RL) at scale as a training strategy for driving policies. Yet such policies remain disconnected from established benchmarks, leaving the performance of large-scale RL for driving on standardized evaluations unknown. We present BehaviorBench -- a comprehensive test suite that closes this gap along three axes: Evaluation, Complexity, and Behavior Diversity. In terms of Evaluation, we provide an interface connecting PufferDrive to nuPlan, which, for the first time, enables policies trained via RL at scale to be evaluated on an established planning benchmark for autonomous driving. Complementarily, we offer an evaluation framework that allows planners to be benchmarked directly inside the PufferDrive simulation, at a fraction of the time. Regarding Complexity, we observe that today's standardized benchmarks are so simple that near-perfect scores are achievable by straight lane following with collision checking. We extract a meaningful, interaction-rich split from the Waymo Open Motion Dataset (WOMD) on which strong performance is impossible without multi-agent reasoning. Lastly, we address Behavior Diversity. Existing benchmarks commonly evaluate planners against a single rule-based traffic model, the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM). We provide a diverse suite of interactive traffic agents to stress-test policies under heterogeneous behaviors, beyond just using IDM. Overall, our benchmarking analysis uncovers the following insight: despite learning interactive behaviors in an emergent manner, policies trained via pure self-play under standard reward functions overfit to their training opponents and fail to generalize to other traffic agent behaviors. Building on this observation, we propose a hybrid planner that combines a PPO policy with a rule-based planner.

Super Agents and Confounders: Influence of surrounding agents on vehicle trajectory prediction

In highly interactive driving scenes, trajectory prediction is conditioned on information from surrounding traffic participants such as cars and pedestrians. Our main contribution is a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art trajectory predictors, which reveals a surprising and critical flaw: many surrounding agents degrade prediction accuracy rather than improve it. Using Shapley-based attribution, we rigorously demonstrate that models learn unstable and non-causal decision-making schemes that vary significantly across training runs. Building on these insights, we propose to integrate a Conditional Information Bottleneck (CIB), which does not require additional supervision and is trained to effectively compress agent features as well as ignore those that are not beneficial for the prediction task. Comprehensive experiments using multiple datasets and model architectures demonstrate that this simple yet effective approach not only improves overall trajectory prediction performance in many cases but also increases robustness to different perturbations. Our results highlight the importance of selectively integrating contextual information, which can often contain spurious or misleading signals, in trajectory prediction. Moreover, we provide interpretable metrics for identifying non-robust behavior and present a promising avenue towards a solution.