Abstract:Video Motion Magnification (VMM) reveals imperceptible dynamics but often suffers from structural inconsistencies under complex geometric transformations. Existing learning-based methods generally face a trade-off between the limited global context of CNNs and the high computational cost of Transformers. In addition, current training protocols, largely dominated by simple linear motion, fail to capture the geometric and imaging complexities encountered in real-world videos. To address these issues, we propose GeoMag, a geometric-aware VMM framework built upon State Space Models to achieve globally consistent motion amplification with linear complexity. We further construct Geo-200K, a large-scale synthetic dataset that introduces rich geometric transformations together with sensor-realistic degradations, improving the diversity and realism of training signals. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that GeoMag consistently outperforms prior methods in visual fidelity and computational efficiency, while producing fewer artifacts and better structural consistency.
Abstract:We introduce SeePhys Pro, a fine-grained modality transfer benchmark that studies whether models preserve the same reasoning capability when critical information is progressively transferred from text to image. Unlike standard vision-essential benchmarks that evaluate a single input form, SeePhys Pro features four semantically aligned variants for each problem with progressively increasing visual elements. Our evaluation shows that current frontier models are far from representation-invariant reasoners: performance degrades on average as information moves from language to diagrams, with visual variable grounding as the most critical bottleneck. Motivated by this inference-time fragility, we further develop large training corpora for multimodal RLVR and use blind training as a diagnostic control, finding that RL with all training images masked can still improve performance on unmasked validation sets. To analyze this effect, text-deletion, image-mask-rate, and format-saturation controls suggest that such gains can arise from residual textual and distributional cues rather than valid visual evidence. Our results highlight the need to evaluate multimodal reasoning not only by final-answer accuracy, but also by robustness under modality transfer and by diagnostics that test whether improvements rely on task-critical visual evidence.