VerAs: Verify then Assess STEM Lab Reports

With an increasing focus in STEM education on critical thinking skills, science writing plays an ever more important role in curricula that stress inquiry skills. A recently published dataset of two sets of college level lab reports from an inquiry-based physics curriculum relies on analytic assessment rubrics that utilize multiple dimensions, specifying subject matter knowledge and general components of good explanations. Each analytic dimension is assessed on a 6-point scale, to provide detailed feedback to students that can help them improve their science writing skills. Manual assessment can be slow, and difficult to calibrate for consistency across all students in large classes. While much work exists on automated assessment of open-ended questions in STEM subjects, there has been far less work on long-form writing such as lab reports. We present an end-to-end neural architecture that has separate verifier and assessment modules, inspired by approaches to Open Domain Question Answering (OpenQA). VerAs first verifies whether a report contains any content relevant to a given rubric dimension, and if so, assesses the relevant sentences. On the lab reports, VerAs outperforms multiple baselines based on OpenQA systems or Automated Essay Scoring (AES). VerAs also performs well on an analytic rubric for middle school physics essays.

Prediction of new outlinks for focused Web crawling

Discovering new hyperlinks enables Web crawlers to find new pages that have not yet been indexed. This is especially important for focused crawlers because they strive to provide a comprehensive analysis of specific parts of the Web, thus prioritizing discovery of new pages over discovery of changes in content. In the literature, changes in hyperlinks and content have been usually considered simultaneously. However, there is also evidence suggesting that these two types of changes are not necessarily related. Moreover, many studies about predicting changes assume that long history of a page is available, which is unattainable in practice. The aim of this work is to provide a methodology for detecting new links effectively using a short history. To this end, we use a dataset of ten crawls at intervals of one week. Our study consists of three parts. First, we obtain insight in the data by analyzing empirical properties of the number of new outlinks. We observe that these properties are, on average, stable over time, but there is a large difference between emergence of hyperlinks towards pages within and outside the domain of a target page (internal and external outlinks, respectively). Next, we provide statistical models for three targets: the link change rate, the presence of new links, and the number of new links. These models include the features used earlier in the literature, as well as new features introduced in this work. We analyze correlation between the features, and investigate their informativeness. A notable finding is that, if the history of the target page is not available, then our new features, that represent the history of related pages, are most predictive for new links in the target page. Finally, we propose ranking methods as guidelines for focused crawlers to efficiently discover new pages, which achieve excellent performance with respect to the corresponding targets.