Plasma GraphRAG: Physics-Grounded Parameter Selection for Gyrokinetic Simulations

Accurate parameter selection is fundamental to gyrokinetic plasma simulations, yet current practices rely heavily on manual literature reviews, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistencies. We introduce Plasma GraphRAG, a novel framework that integrates Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) with large language models (LLMs) for automated, physics-grounded parameter range identification. By constructing a domain-specific knowledge graph from curated plasma literature and enabling structured retrieval over graph-anchored entities and relations, Plasma GraphRAG enables LLMs to generate accurate, context-aware recommendations. Extensive evaluations across five metrics, comprehensiveness, diversity, grounding, hallucination, and empowerment, demonstrate that Plasma GraphRAG outperforms vanilla RAG by over $10\%$ in overall quality and reduces hallucination rates by up to $25\%$. {Beyond enhancing simulation reliability, Plasma GraphRAG offers a methodology for accelerating scientific discovery across complex, data-rich domains.

CRAB: Codebook Rebalancing for Bias Mitigation in Generative Recommendation

Generative recommendation (GeneRec) has introduced a new paradigm that represents items as discrete semantic tokens and predicts items in a generative manner. Despite its strong performance across multiple recommendation tasks, existing GeneRec approaches still suffer from severe popularity bias and may even exacerbate it. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive empirical analysis to uncover the root causes of this phenomenon, yielding two core insights: 1) imbalanced tokenization inherits and can further amplify popularity bias from historical item interactions; 2) current training procedures disproportionately favor popular tokens while neglecting semantic relationships among tokens, thereby intensifying popularity bias. Building on these insights, we propose CRAB, a post-hoc debiasing strategy for GeneRec that alleviates popularity bias by mitigating frequency imbalance among semantic tokens. Specifically, given a well-trained model, we first rebalance the codebook by splitting over-popular tokens while preserving their hierarchical semantic structure. Based on the adjusted codebook, we further introduce a tree-structured regularizer to enhance semantic consistency, encouraging more informative representations for unpopular tokens during training. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that CRAB significantly improves recommendation performance by effectively alleviating popularity bias.

The Infinite-Dimensional Nature of Spectroscopy and Why Models Succeed, Fail, and Mislead

Machine learning (ML) models have achieved strikingly high accuracies in spectroscopic classification tasks, often without a clear proof that those models used chemically meaningful features. Existing studies have linked these results to data preprocessing choices, noise sensitivity, and model complexity, but no unifying explanation is available so far. In this work, we show that these phenomena arise naturally from the intrinsic high dimensionality of spectral data. Using a theoretical analysis grounded in the Feldman-Hajek theorem and the concentration of measure, we show that even infinitesimal distributional differences, caused by noise, normalisation, or instrumental artefacts, may become perfectly separable in high-dimensional spaces. Through a series of specific experiments on synthetic and real fluorescence spectra, we illustrate how models can achieve near-perfect accuracy even when chemical distinctions are absent, and why feature-importance maps may highlight spectrally irrelevant regions. We provide a rigorous theoretical framework, confirm the effect experimentally, and conclude with practical recommendations for building and interpreting ML models in spectroscopy.

SLSREC: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Adaptive Fusion of Long- and Short-Term User Interests

User interests typically encompass both long-term preferences and short-term intentions, reflecting the dynamic nature of user behaviors across different timeframes. The uneven temporal distribution of user interactions highlights the evolving patterns of interests, making it challenging to accurately capture shifts in interests using comprehensive historical behaviors. To address this, we propose SLSRec, a novel Session-based model with the fusion of Long- and Short-term Recommendations that effectively captures the temporal dynamics of user interests by segmenting historical behaviors over time. Unlike conventional models that combine long- and short-term user interests into a single representation, compromising recommendation accuracy, SLSRec utilizes a self-supervised learning framework to disentangle these two types of interests. A contrastive learning strategy is introduced to ensure accurate calibration of long- and short-term interest representations. Additionally, an attention-based fusion network is designed to adaptively aggregate interest representations, optimizing their integration to enhance recommendation performance. Extensive experiments on three public benchmark datasets demonstrate that SLSRec consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models while exhibiting superior robustness across various scenarios.We will release all source code upon acceptance.

FAVE: Flow-based Average Velocity Establishment for Sequential Recommendation

Generative recommendation has emerged as a transformative paradigm for capturing the dynamic evolution of user intents in sequential recommendation. While flow-based methods improve the efficiency of diffusion models, they remain hindered by the ``Noise-to-Data'' paradigm, which introduces two critical inefficiencies: prior mismatch, where generation starts from uninformative noise, forcing a lengthy recovery trajectory; and linear redundancy, where iterative solvers waste computation on modeling deterministic preference transitions. To address these limitations, we propose a Flow-based Average Velocity Establishment (Fave) framework for one-step generation recommendation that learns a direct trajectory from an informative prior to the target distribution. Fave is structured via a progressive two-stage training strategy. In Stage 1, we establish a stable preference space through dual-end semantic alignment, applying constraints at both the source (user history) and target (next item) to prevent representation collapse. In Stage 2, we directly resolve the efficiency bottlenecks by introducing a semantic anchor prior, which initializes the flow with a masked embedding from the user's interaction history, providing an informative starting point. Then we learn a global average velocity, consolidating the multi-step trajectory into a single displacement vector, and enforce trajectory straightness via a JVP-based consistency constraint to ensure one-step generation. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that Fave not only achieves state-of-the-art recommendation performance but also delivers an order-of-magnitude improvement in inference efficiency, making it practical for latency-sensitive scenarios.

Benchmarking Multi-turn Medical Diagnosis: Hold, Lure, and Self-Correction

Large language models (LLMs) achieve high accuracy in medical diagnosis when all clinical information is provided in a single turn, yet how they behave under multi-turn evidence accumulation closer to real clinical reasoning remains unexplored. We introduce MINT (Medical Incremental N-Turn Benchmark), a high-fidelity, multi-turn medical diagnosis benchmark comprising 1,035 cases with clinically labeled evidence shards, controlled turn granularity, and information-preserving decomposition. Through systematic evaluation of 11 LLMs on MINT, we uncover three persistent behavioral patterns that significantly impact diagnostic decisions: (1) intent to answer, models rush to answer before sufficient evidence has been observed, with over 55% of answers committed within the first two turns; (2) self-correction, incorrect-to-correct answer revisions occur at up to 10.6 times the rate of correct-to-incorrect flips, revealing a latent capacity for self-correction that premature commitment forecloses; and (3) strong lures, clinically salient information such as laboratory results trigger premature answering even when models are explicitly instructed to wait. We translate these findings into clinically actionable guidance: deferring the diagnostic question to later turns reduces premature answering and improves accuracy at the first point of commitment by up to 62.6%, while reserving salient clinical evidence for later turns prevents a catastrophic accuracy drop of up to 23.3% caused by premature commitment. Our work provides both a controlled evaluation framework and concrete recommendations for improving the reliability of LLMs in multi-turn medical diagnosis.

Learning from Equivalence Queries, Revisited

Modern machine learning systems, such as generative models and recommendation systems, often evolve through a cycle of deployment, user interaction, and periodic model updates. This differs from standard supervised learning frameworks, which focus on loss or regret minimization over a fixed sequence of prediction tasks. Motivated by this setting, we revisit the classical model of learning from equivalence queries, introduced by Angluin (1988). In this model, a learner repeatedly proposes hypotheses and, when a deployed hypothesis is inadequate, receives a counterexample. Under fully adversarial counterexample generation, however, the model can be overly pessimistic. In addition, most prior work assumes a \emph{full-information} setting, where the learner also observes the correct label of the counterexample, an assumption that is not always natural. We address these issues by restricting the environment to a broad class of less adversarial counterexample generators, which we call \emph{symmetric}. Informally, such generators choose counterexamples based only on the symmetric difference between the hypothesis and the target. This class captures natural mechanisms such as random counterexamples (Angluin and Dohrn, 2017; Bhatia, 2021; Chase, Freitag, and Reyzin, 2024), as well as generators that return the simplest counterexample according to a prescribed complexity measure. Within this framework, we study learning from equivalence queries under both full-information and bandit feedback. We obtain tight bounds on the number of learning rounds in both settings and highlight directions for future work. Our analysis combines a game-theoretic view of symmetric adversaries with adaptive weighting methods and minimax arguments.

GUIDE: Interpretable GUI Agent Evaluation via Hierarchical Diagnosis

Evaluating GUI agents presents a distinct challenge: trajectories are long, visually grounded, and open-ended, yet evaluation must be both accurate and interpretable. Existing approaches typically apply a single holistic judgment over the entire action-observation sequence-a strategy that proves unreliable on long-horizon tasks and yields binary verdicts offering no insight into where or why an agent fails. This opacity limits the utility of evaluation as a diagnostic tool for agent development. We introduce GUIDE (GUI Understanding and Interpretable Diagnostic Evaluation), a framework that decomposes trajectory assessment into three sequential stages mirroring the compositional structure of GUI tasks. Trajectory Segmentation partitions the full trace into semantically coherent subtask units. Subtask Diagnosis evaluates each unit in context, assigning a completion verdict and generating a structured error analysis with corrective recommendations. Overall Summary aggregates per-subtask diagnoses into a task-level judgment. By operating on bounded subtask segments rather than full trajectories, GUIDE mitigates the context overload that degrades existing evaluators as task complexity grows. We validate GUIDE on three benchmarks: an industrial e-commerce dataset of 932 trajectories, AGENTREWARDBENCH spanning five web agent tasks with 1302 trajectories, and AndroidBench for mobile device control. Across all settings, GUIDE substantially outperforms existing evaluators-achieving up to 5.35 percentage points higher accuracy than the strongest baseline-while producing structured diagnostic reports that directly inform agent improvement.

Justified or Just Convincing? Error Verifiability as a Dimension of LLM Quality

As LLMs are deployed in high-stakes settings, users must judge the correctness of individual responses, often relying on model-generated justifications such as reasoning chains or explanations. Yet, no standard measure exists for whether these justifications help users distinguish correct answers from incorrect ones. We formalize this idea as error verifiability and propose $v_{\text{bal}}$, a balanced metric that measures whether justifications enable raters to accurately assess answer correctness, validated against human raters who show high agreement. We find that neither common approaches, such as post-training and model scaling, nor more targeted interventions recommended improve verifiability. We introduce two methods that succeed at improving verifiability: reflect-and-rephrase (RR) for mathematical reasoning and oracle-rephrase (OR) for factual QA, both of which improve verifiability by incorporating domain-appropriate external information. Together, our results establish error verifiability as a distinct dimension of response quality that does not emerge from accuracy improvements alone and requires dedicated, domain-aware methods to address.

Evaluating Scene-based In-Situ Item Labeling for Immersive Conversational Recommendation

The growing ubiquity of Extended Reality (XR) is driving Conversational Recommendation Systems (CRS) toward visually immersive experiences. We formalize this paradigm as Immersive CRS (ICRS), where recommended items are highlighted directly in the user's scene-based visual environment and augmented with in-situ labels. While item recommendation has been widely studied, the problem of how to select and evaluate which information to present as immersive labels remains an open problem. To this end, we introduce a principled categorization of information needs into explicit intent satisfaction and proactive information needs and use these to define novel evaluation metrics for item label selection. We benchmark IR-, LLM-, and VLM-based methods across three datasets and ICRS scenarios: fashion, movie recommendation, and retail shopping. Our evaluation reveals three important limitations of existing methods: (1) they fail to leverage scenario-specific information modalities (e.g., visual cues for fashion, meta-data for retail), (2) they present redundant information that is visually inferable, and (3) they poorly anticipate users' proactive information needs from explicit dialogue alone. In summary, this work provides both a novel evaluation paradigm for in-situ item labeling in ICRS and highlights key challenges for future work.