Better heads do not guarantee better binarized constituency parsing

We revisit punctuation-aware tree binarization for constituency parsing and ask whether dependency-induced headedness improves binary parser supervision. Although learned heads substantially outperform rule-based heads in intrinsic head prediction, they do not yield consistent parsing gains after debinarization. In particular, punctuation-conditioned evaluation shows that learned headedness underperforms rule-based binarization in macro-average punctuation-sensitive $F_1$, despite a small overall gain on CTB. Similar instability appears under cross-treebank transfer. These results suggest that \ycc{linguistically grounded} headedness is not necessarily parser-optimal when used as a binarization control signal. The paper presents a negative result: better head prediction does not imply better punctuation-sensitive constituency parsing.

Exploiting Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Transformers for Sequence-to-Sequence Constituent Parsing

To achieve deep natural language understanding, syntactic constituent parsing plays a crucial role and is widely required by many artificial intelligence systems for processing both text and speech. A recent approach involves using standard sequence-to-sequence models to handle constituent parsing as a machine translation problem, moving away from traditional task-specific parsers. These models are typically initialized with pre-trained encoder-only language models like BERT or RoBERTa. However, the use of pre-trained encoder-decoder language models for constituency parsing has not been thoroughly explored. To bridge this gap, we extend the sequence-to-sequence framework by investigating parsers built on pre-trained encoder-decoder architectures, including BART, mBART, and T5. We fine-tune them to generate linearized parse trees and extensively evaluate them on different linearization strategies across both continuous treebanks and more complex discontinuous benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that our approach outperforms all prior sequence-to-sequence models and performs competitively with leading task-specific constituent parsers on continuous constituent parsing.

Learning Constituent Headedness

Headedness is widely used as an organizing device in syntactic analysis, yet constituency treebanks rarely encode it explicitly and most processing pipelines recover it procedurally via percolation rules. We treat this notion of constituent headedness as an explicit representational layer and learn it as a supervised prediction task over aligned constituency and dependency annotations, inducing supervision by defining each constituent head as the dependency span head. On aligned English and Chinese data, the resulting models achieve near-ceiling intrinsic accuracy and substantially outperform Collins-style rule-based percolation. Predicted heads yield comparable parsing accuracy under head-driven binarization, consistent with the induced binary training targets being largely equivalent across head choices, while increasing the fidelity of deterministic constituency-to-dependency conversion and transferring across resources and languages under simple label-mapping interfaces.

What Exactly do Children Receive in Language Acquisition? A Case Study on CHILDES with Automated Detection of Filler-Gap Dependencies

Children's acquisition of filler-gap dependencies has been argued by some to depend on innate grammatical knowledge, while others suggest that the distributional evidence available in child-directed speech suffices. Unfortunately, the relevant input is difficult to quantify at scale with fine granularity, making this question difficult to resolve. We present a system that identifies three core filler-gap constructions in spoken English corpora -- matrix wh-questions, embedded wh-questions, and relative clauses -- and further identifies the extraction site (i.e., subject vs. object vs. adjunct). Our approach combines constituency and dependency parsing, leveraging their complementary strengths for construction classification and extraction site identification. We validate the system on human-annotated data and find that it scores well across most categories. Applying the system to 57 English CHILDES corpora, we are able to characterize children's filler-gap input and their filler-gap production trajectories over the course of development, including construction-specific frequencies and extraction-site asymmetries. The resulting fine-grained labels enable future work in both acquisition and computational studies, which we demonstrate with a case study using filtered corpus training with language models.

We can still parse using syntactic rules

This research introduces a new parsing approach, based on earlier syntactic work on context free grammar (CFG) and generalized phrase structure grammar (GPSG). The approach comprises both a new parsing algorithm and a set of syntactic rules and features that overcome the limitations of CFG. It also generates both dependency and constituency parse trees, while accommodating noise and incomplete parses. The system was tested on data from Universal Dependencies, showing a promising average Unlabeled Attachment Score (UAS) of 54.5% in the development dataset (7 corpora) and 53.8% in the test set (12 corpora). The system also provides multiple parse hypotheses, allowing further reranking to improve parsing accuracy. This approach also leverages much of the theoretical syntactic work since the 1950s to be used within a computational context. The application of this approach provides a transparent and interpretable NLP model to process language input.

Lexicalized Constituency Parsing for Middle Dutch: Low-resource Training and Cross-Domain Generalization

Recent years have seen growing interest in applying neural networks and contextualized word embeddings to the parsing of historical languages. However, most advances have focused on dependency parsing, while constituency parsing for low-resource historical languages like Middle Dutch has received little attention. In this paper, we adapt a transformer-based constituency parser to Middle Dutch, a highly heterogeneous and low-resource language, and investigate methods to improve both its in-domain and cross-domain performance. We show that joint training with higher-resource auxiliary languages increases F1 scores by up to 0.73, with the greatest gains achieved from languages that are geographically and temporally closer to Middle Dutch. We further evaluate strategies for leveraging newly annotated data from additional domains, finding that fine-tuning and data combination yield comparable improvements, and our neural parser consistently outperforms the currently used PCFG-based parser for Middle Dutch. We further explore feature-separation techniques for domain adaptation and demonstrate that a minimum threshold of approximately 200 examples per domain is needed to effectively enhance cross-domain performance.

Contrastive Learning on LLM Back Generation Treebank for Cross-domain Constituency Parsing

Cross-domain constituency parsing is still an unsolved challenge in computational linguistics since the available multi-domain constituency treebank is limited. We investigate automatic treebank generation by large language models (LLMs) in this paper. The performance of LLMs on constituency parsing is poor, therefore we propose a novel treebank generation method, LLM back generation, which is similar to the reverse process of constituency parsing. LLM back generation takes the incomplete cross-domain constituency tree with only domain keyword leaf nodes as input and fills the missing words to generate the cross-domain constituency treebank. Besides, we also introduce a span-level contrastive learning pre-training strategy to make full use of the LLM back generation treebank for cross-domain constituency parsing. We verify the effectiveness of our LLM back generation treebank coupled with contrastive learning pre-training on five target domains of MCTB. Experimental results show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on average results compared with various baselines.

Citation Parsing and Analysis with Language Models

A key type of resource needed to address global inequalities in knowledge production and dissemination is a tool that can support journals in understanding how knowledge circulates. The absence of such a tool has resulted in comparatively less information about networks of knowledge sharing in the Global South. In turn, this gap authorizes the exclusion of researchers and scholars from the South in indexing services, reinforcing colonial arrangements that de-center and minoritize those scholars. In order to support citation network tracking on a global scale, we investigate the capacity of open-weight language models to mark up manuscript citations in an indexable format. We assembled a dataset of matched plaintext and annotated citations from preprints and published research papers. Then, we evaluated a number of open-weight language models on the annotation task. We find that, even out of the box, today's language models achieve high levels of accuracy on identifying the constituent components of each citation, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, the smallest model we evaluated, Qwen3-0.6B, can parse all fields with high accuracy in $2^5$ passes, suggesting that post-training is likely to be effective in producing small, robust citation parsing models. Such a tool could greatly improve the fidelity of citation networks and thus meaningfully improve research indexing and discovery, as well as further metascientific research.

LP-LM: No Hallucinations in Question Answering with Logic Programming

Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like responses to user queries. However, LLMs exhibit inherent limitations, especially because they hallucinate. This paper introduces LP-LM, a system that grounds answers to questions in known facts contained in a knowledge base (KB), facilitated through semantic parsing in Prolog, and always produces answers that are reliable. LP-LM generates a most probable constituency parse tree along with a corresponding Prolog term for an input question via Prolog definite clause grammar (DCG) parsing. The term is then executed against a KB of natural language sentences also represented as Prolog terms for question answering. By leveraging DCG and tabling, LP-LM runs in linear time in the size of input sentences for sufficiently many grammar rules. Performing experiments comparing LP-LM with current well-known LLMs in accuracy, we show that LLMs hallucinate on even simple questions, unlike LP-LM.

SCHNet: SAM Marries CLIP for Human Parsing

Vision Foundation Model (VFM) such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Model (CLIP) has shown promising performance for segmentation and detection tasks. However, although SAM excels in fine-grained segmentation, it faces major challenges when applying it to semantic-aware segmentation. While CLIP exhibits a strong semantic understanding capability via aligning the global features of language and vision, it has deficiencies in fine-grained segmentation tasks. Human parsing requires to segment human bodies into constituent parts and involves both accurate fine-grained segmentation and high semantic understanding of each part. Based on traits of SAM and CLIP, we formulate high efficient modules to effectively integrate features of them to benefit human parsing. We propose a Semantic-Refinement Module to integrate semantic features of CLIP with SAM features to benefit parsing. Moreover, we formulate a high efficient Fine-tuning Module to adjust the pretrained SAM for human parsing that needs high semantic information and simultaneously demands spatial details, which significantly reduces the training time compared with full-time training and achieves notable performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on LIP, PPP, and CIHP databases.