Two-Timescale Q-Learning with Function Approximation in Zero-Sum Stochastic Games

We consider two-player zero-sum stochastic games and propose a two-timescale $Q$-learning algorithm with function approximation that is payoff-based, convergent, rational, and symmetric between the two players. In two-timescale $Q$-learning, the fast-timescale iterates are updated in spirit to the stochastic gradient descent and the slow-timescale iterates (which we use to compute the policies) are updated by taking a convex combination between its previous iterate and the latest fast-timescale iterate. Introducing the slow timescale as well as its update equation marks as our main algorithmic novelty. In the special case of linear function approximation, we establish, to the best of our knowledge, the first last-iterate finite-sample bound for payoff-based independent learning dynamics of these types. The result implies a polynomial sample complexity to find a Nash equilibrium in such stochastic games. To establish the results, we model our proposed algorithm as a two-timescale stochastic approximation and derive the finite-sample bound through a Lyapunov-based approach. The key novelty lies in constructing a valid Lyapunov function to capture the evolution of the slow-timescale iterates. Specifically, through a change of variable, we show that the update equation of the slow-timescale iterates resembles the classical smoothed best-response dynamics, where the regularized Nash gap serves as a valid Lyapunov function. This insight enables us to construct a valid Lyapunov function via a generalized variant of the Moreau envelope of the regularized Nash gap. The construction of our Lyapunov function might be of broad independent interest in studying the behavior of stochastic approximation algorithms.

Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation: Additive and Multiplicative Noise

In this work, we study the concentration behavior of a stochastic approximation (SA) algorithm under a contractive operator with respect to an arbitrary norm. We consider two settings where the iterates are potentially unbounded: (1) bounded multiplicative noise, and (2) additive sub-Gaussian noise. We obtain maximal concentration inequalities on the convergence errors, and show that these errors have sub-Gaussian tails in the additive noise setting, and super-polynomial tails (faster than polynomial decay) in the multiplicative noise setting. In addition, we provide an impossibility result showing that it is in general not possible to achieve sub-exponential tails for SA with multiplicative noise. To establish these results, we develop a novel bootstrapping argument that involves bounding the moment generating function of the generalized Moreau envelope of the error and the construction of an exponential supermartingale to enable using Ville's maximal inequality. To demonstrate the applicability of our theoretical results, we use them to provide maximal concentration bounds for a large class of reinforcement learning algorithms, including but not limited to on-policy TD-learning with linear function approximation, off-policy TD-learning with generalized importance sampling factors, and $Q$-learning. To the best of our knowledge, super-polynomial concentration bounds for off-policy TD-learning have not been established in the literature due to the challenge of handling the combination of unbounded iterates and multiplicative noise.

Convergence Rates for Localized Actor-Critic in Networked Markov Potential Games

We introduce a class of networked Markov potential games where agents are associated with nodes in a network. Each agent has its own local potential function, and the reward of each agent depends only on the states and actions of agents within a $\kappa$-hop neighborhood. In this context, we propose a localized actor-critic algorithm. The algorithm is scalable since each agent uses only local information and does not need access to the global state. Further, the algorithm overcomes the curse of dimensionality through the use of function approximation. Our main results provide finite-sample guarantees up to a localization error and a function approximation error. Specifically, we achieve an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-4})$ sample complexity measured by the averaged Nash regret. This is the first finite-sample bound for multi-agent competitive games that does not depend on the number of agents.

A Finite-Sample Analysis of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Games

We study two-player zero-sum stochastic games, and propose a form of independent learning dynamics called Doubly Smoothed Best-Response dynamics, which integrates a discrete and doubly smoothed variant of the best-response dynamics into temporal-difference (TD)-learning and minimax value iteration. The resulting dynamics are payoff-based, convergent, rational, and symmetric among players. Our main results provide finite-sample guarantees. In particular, we prove the first-known $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/\epsilon^2)$ sample complexity bound for payoff-based independent learning dynamics, up to a smoothing bias. In the special case where the stochastic game has only one state (i.e., matrix games), we provide a sharper $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/\epsilon)$ sample complexity. Our analysis uses a novel coupled Lyapunov drift approach to capture the evolution of multiple sets of coupled and stochastic iterates, which might be of independent interest.

Global Convergence of Localized Policy Iteration in Networked Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

We study a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) problem where the agents interact over a given network. The goal of the agents is to cooperatively maximize the average of their entropy-regularized long-term rewards. To overcome the curse of dimensionality and to reduce communication, we propose a Localized Policy Iteration (LPI) algorithm that provably learns a near-globally-optimal policy using only local information. In particular, we show that, despite restricting each agent's attention to only its $\kappa$-hop neighborhood, the agents are able to learn a policy with an optimality gap that decays polynomially in $\kappa$. In addition, we show the finite-sample convergence of LPI to the global optimal policy, which explicitly captures the trade-off between optimality and computational complexity in choosing $\kappa$. Numerical simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of LPI.

Sample Complexity of Policy-Based Methods under Off-Policy Sampling and Linear Function Approximation

In this work, we study policy-based methods for solving the reinforcement learning problem, where off-policy sampling and linear function approximation are employed for policy evaluation, and various policy update rules, including natural policy gradient (NPG), are considered for policy update. To solve the policy evaluation sub-problem in the presence of the deadly triad, we propose a generic algorithm framework of multi-step TD-learning with generalized importance sampling ratios, which includes two specific algorithms: the $\lambda$-averaged $Q$-trace and the two-sided $Q$-trace. The generic algorithm is single time-scale, has provable finite-sample guarantees, and overcomes the high variance issue in off-policy learning. As for the policy update, we provide a universal analysis using only the contraction property and the monotonicity property of the Bellman operator to establish the geometric convergence under various policy update rules. Importantly, by viewing NPG as an approximate way of implementing policy iteration, we establish the geometric convergence of NPG without introducing regularization, and without using mirror descent type of analysis as in existing literature. Combining the geometric convergence of the policy update with the finite-sample analysis of the policy evaluation, we establish for the first time an overall $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ sample complexity for finding an optimal policy (up to a function approximation error) using policy-based methods under off-policy sampling and linear function approximation.

Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly triad in $Q$-Learning

$Q$-learning with function approximation is one of the most empirically successful while theoretically mysterious reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, and was identified in Sutton (1999) as one of the most important theoretical open problems in the RL community. Even in the basic linear function approximation setting, there are well-known divergent examples. In this work, we propose a stable design for $Q$-learning with linear function approximation using target network and truncation, and establish its finite-sample guarantees. Our result implies an $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ sample complexity up to a function approximation error. This is the first variant of $Q$-learning with linear function approximation that is provably stable without requiring strong assumptions or modifying the problem parameters, and achieves the optimal sample complexity.

Stationary Behavior of Constant Stepsize SGD Type Algorithms: An Asymptotic Characterization

Stochastic approximation (SA) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms are work-horses for modern machine learning algorithms. Their constant stepsize variants are preferred in practice due to fast convergence behavior. However, constant step stochastic iterative algorithms do not converge asymptotically to the optimal solution, but instead have a stationary distribution, which in general cannot be analytically characterized. In this work, we study the asymptotic behavior of the appropriately scaled stationary distribution, in the limit when the constant stepsize goes to zero. Specifically, we consider the following three settings: (1) SGD algorithms with smooth and strongly convex objective, (2) linear SA algorithms involving a Hurwitz matrix, and (3) nonlinear SA algorithms involving a contractive operator. When the iterate is scaled by $1/\sqrt{\alpha}$, where $\alpha$ is the constant stepsize, we show that the limiting scaled stationary distribution is a solution of an integral equation. Under a uniqueness assumption (which can be removed in certain settings) on this equation, we further characterize the limiting distribution as a Gaussian distribution whose covariance matrix is the unique solution of a suitable Lyapunov equation. For SA algorithms beyond these cases, our numerical experiments suggest that unlike central limit theorem type results: (1) the scaling factor need not be $1/\sqrt{\alpha}$, and (2) the limiting distribution need not be Gaussian. Based on the numerical study, we come up with a formula to determine the right scaling factor, and make insightful connection to the Euler-Maruyama discretization scheme for approximating stochastic differential equations.

Finite-Sample Analysis of Off-Policy TD-Learning via Generalized Bellman Operators

In temporal difference (TD) learning, off-policy sampling is known to be more practical than on-policy sampling, and by decoupling learning from data collection, it enables data reuse. It is known that policy evaluation (including multi-step off-policy importance sampling) has the interpretation of solving a generalized Bellman equation. In this paper, we derive finite-sample bounds for any general off-policy TD-like stochastic approximation algorithm that solves for the fixed-point of this generalized Bellman operator. Our key step is to show that the generalized Bellman operator is simultaneously a contraction mapping with respect to a weighted $\ell_p$-norm for each $p$ in $[1,\infty)$, with a common contraction factor. Off-policy TD-learning is known to suffer from high variance due to the product of importance sampling ratios. A number of algorithms (e.g. $Q^\pi(\lambda)$, Tree-Backup$(\lambda)$, Retrace$(\lambda)$, and $Q$-trace) have been proposed in the literature to address this issue. Our results immediately imply finite-sample bounds of these algorithms. In particular, we provide first-known finite-sample guarantees for $Q^\pi(\lambda)$, Tree-Backup$(\lambda)$, and Retrace$(\lambda)$, and improve the best known bounds of $Q$-trace in [19]. Moreover, we show the bias-variance trade-offs in each of these algorithms.

Finite-Sample Analysis of Off-Policy Natural Actor-Critic with Linear Function Approximation

In this paper, we develop a novel variant of off-policy natural actor-critic algorithm with linear function approximation and we establish a sample complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-3})$, outperforming all the previously known convergence bounds of such algorithms. In order to overcome the divergence due to deadly triad in off-policy policy evaluation under function approximation, we develop a critic that employs $n$-step TD-learning algorithm with a properly chosen $n$. We present finite-sample convergence bounds on this critic under both constant and diminishing step sizes, which are of independent interest. Furthermore, we develop a variant of natural policy gradient under function approximation, with an improved convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$ after $T$ iterations. Combining the finite sample error bounds of actor and the critic, we obtain the $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-3})$ sample complexity. We derive our sample complexity bounds solely based on the assumption that the behavior policy sufficiently explores all the states and actions, which is a much lighter assumption compared to the related literature.