Picture for Yugo Murawaki

Yugo Murawaki

How Does Cognitive Bias Affect Large Language Models? A Case Study on the Anchoring Effect in Price Negotiation Simulations

Add code
Aug 28, 2025
Viaarxiv icon

Addressing Tokenization Inconsistency in Steganography and Watermarking Based on Large Language Models

Add code
Aug 28, 2025
Viaarxiv icon

Investigating Cost-Efficiency of LLM-Generated Training Data for Conversational Semantic Frame Analysis

Add code
Oct 09, 2024
Figure 1 for Investigating Cost-Efficiency of LLM-Generated Training Data for Conversational Semantic Frame Analysis
Figure 2 for Investigating Cost-Efficiency of LLM-Generated Training Data for Conversational Semantic Frame Analysis
Figure 3 for Investigating Cost-Efficiency of LLM-Generated Training Data for Conversational Semantic Frame Analysis
Figure 4 for Investigating Cost-Efficiency of LLM-Generated Training Data for Conversational Semantic Frame Analysis
Viaarxiv icon

Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in?

Add code
Aug 20, 2024
Figure 1 for Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in?
Figure 2 for Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in?
Figure 3 for Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in?
Figure 4 for Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in?
Viaarxiv icon

LLM-jp: A Cross-organizational Project for the Research and Development of Fully Open Japanese LLMs

Add code
Jul 04, 2024
Figure 1 for LLM-jp: A Cross-organizational Project for the Research and Development of Fully Open Japanese LLMs
Figure 2 for LLM-jp: A Cross-organizational Project for the Research and Development of Fully Open Japanese LLMs
Figure 3 for LLM-jp: A Cross-organizational Project for the Research and Development of Fully Open Japanese LLMs
Figure 4 for LLM-jp: A Cross-organizational Project for the Research and Development of Fully Open Japanese LLMs
Viaarxiv icon

Principal Component Analysis as a Sanity Check for Bayesian Phylolinguistic Reconstruction

Add code
Feb 29, 2024
Figure 1 for Principal Component Analysis as a Sanity Check for Bayesian Phylolinguistic Reconstruction
Figure 2 for Principal Component Analysis as a Sanity Check for Bayesian Phylolinguistic Reconstruction
Figure 3 for Principal Component Analysis as a Sanity Check for Bayesian Phylolinguistic Reconstruction
Figure 4 for Principal Component Analysis as a Sanity Check for Bayesian Phylolinguistic Reconstruction
Viaarxiv icon

Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganography

Add code
Nov 12, 2022
Figure 1 for Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganography
Figure 2 for Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganography
Figure 3 for Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganography
Figure 4 for Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganography
Viaarxiv icon

Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Model

Add code
Apr 20, 2021
Figure 1 for Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Model
Figure 2 for Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Model
Figure 3 for Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Model
Figure 4 for Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Model
Viaarxiv icon

A System for Worldwide COVID-19 Information Aggregation

Add code
Jul 28, 2020
Figure 1 for A System for Worldwide COVID-19 Information Aggregation
Figure 2 for A System for Worldwide COVID-19 Information Aggregation
Figure 3 for A System for Worldwide COVID-19 Information Aggregation
Figure 4 for A System for Worldwide COVID-19 Information Aggregation
Viaarxiv icon

Minimally Supervised Learning of Affective Events Using Discourse Relations

Add code
Sep 02, 2019
Figure 1 for Minimally Supervised Learning of Affective Events Using Discourse Relations
Figure 2 for Minimally Supervised Learning of Affective Events Using Discourse Relations
Figure 3 for Minimally Supervised Learning of Affective Events Using Discourse Relations
Figure 4 for Minimally Supervised Learning of Affective Events Using Discourse Relations
Viaarxiv icon