DentAgent: Evidence-Centric Multi-Agent Coordination for Multimodal Dental Reasoning

Oral diseases affect billions of people worldwide, underscoring a pressing need for accurate and reliable dental assessment that integrates heterogeneous evidence from domain knowledge, radiographs, intraoral photographs, and 3D dental data. Most existing dental AI systems remain modality- or task-specific. Although recent vision-language models support flexible dental question answering, directly generated response leaves evidence implicit and untraceable. To address these limitations, we introduce DentAgent, an evidence-centric multi-agent framework, in which the Orchestrator coordinate five specialized agents spanning various modalities. Each specialist utilizes domain tools to convert observations into structured evidence records. The Evidence Blackboard manages these records as a shared evidence state, tracking coverage, gaps, and conflicts before response generation. This standardized evidence representation integrates isolated dental capabilities into a unified agentic workflow. Across four benchmarks, DentAgent demonstrates leading performance, even surpassing the senior specialists by 17.3 percentage points on multi-label diagnosis, which supports its value for broadly applicable and traceable multimodal dental reasoning, and highlights its potential as a technical foundation for population oral health assessment and management.

MIRA: A Bilingual Benchmark for Medical Information Response Audit

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to provide public-facing health information, yet existing safety evaluations overlook whether responses preserve comparable medical information across different user phrasings of the same question. To address this, we introduce the Medical Information Response Audit (MIRA), a bilingual, controlled benchmark that assesses whether LLMs provide comparable medical information across user-side language, register, and health literacy signals. MIRA contains 4,320 prompts built from 60 medically reviewed, low-risk health questions. Across five mainstream LLMs, models answered all medical questions, but responses to low health-literacy signals consistently omitted more key information, provided fewer concrete next steps, and offered less support for independent judgment. We term this pattern Differential Information Dilution (DID). Language effects are model-specific rather than uniformly worse for non-English prompts. A comparison with 300 real-world health queries provides preliminary evidence of rank-order validity. A knowledge-guided mitigation prompt reduces information dilution for most models, with the largest reductions in underinformative simplification observed for Claude (~8%) and Qwen (~6%).