Quantifying the degree of similarity between images is a key copyright issue for image-based machine learning. In legal doctrine however, determining the degree of similarity between works requires subjective analysis, and fact-finders (judges and juries) can demonstrate considerable variability in these subjective judgement calls. Images that are structurally similar can be deemed dissimilar, whereas images of completely different scenes can be deemed similar enough to support a claim of copying. We seek to define and compute a notion of "conceptual similarity" among images that captures high-level relations even among images that do not share repeated elements or visually similar components. The idea is to use a base multi-modal model to generate "explanations" (captions) of visual data at increasing levels of complexity. Then, similarity can be measured by the length of the caption needed to discriminate between the two images: Two highly dissimilar images can be discriminated early in their description, whereas conceptually dissimilar ones will need more detail to be distinguished. We operationalize this definition and show that it correlates with subjective (averaged human evaluation) assessment, and beats existing baselines on both image-to-image and text-to-text similarity benchmarks. Beyond just providing a number, our method also offers interpretability by pointing to the specific level of granularity of the description where the source data are differentiated.
We propose to extract meaning representations from autoregressive language models by considering the distribution of all possible trajectories extending an input text. This strategy is prompt-free, does not require fine-tuning, and is applicable to any pre-trained autoregressive model. Moreover, unlike vector-based representations, distribution-based representations can also model asymmetric relations (e.g., direction of logical entailment, hypernym/hyponym relations) by using algebraic operations between likelihood functions. These ideas are grounded in distributional perspectives on semantics and are connected to standard constructions in automata theory, but to our knowledge they have not been applied to modern language models. We empirically show that the representations obtained from large models align well with human annotations, outperform other zero-shot and prompt-free methods on semantic similarity tasks, and can be used to solve more complex entailment and containment tasks that standard embeddings cannot handle. Finally, we extend our method to represent data from different modalities (e.g., image and text) using multimodal autoregressive models.
Unsupervised depth completion methods are trained by minimizing sparse depth and image reconstruction error. Block artifacts from resampling, intensity saturation, and occlusions are amongst the many undesirable by-products of common data augmentation schemes that affect image reconstruction quality, and thus the training signal. Hence, typical augmentations on images that are viewed as essential to training pipelines in other vision tasks have seen limited use beyond small image intensity changes and flipping. The sparse depth modality have seen even less as intensity transformations alter the scale of the 3D scene, and geometric transformations may decimate the sparse points during resampling. We propose a method that unlocks a wide range of previously-infeasible geometric augmentations for unsupervised depth completion. This is achieved by reversing, or "undo"-ing, geometric transformations to the coordinates of the output depth, warping the depth map back to the original reference frame. This enables computing the reconstruction losses using the original images and sparse depth maps, eliminating the pitfalls of naive loss computation on the augmented inputs. This simple yet effective strategy allows us to scale up augmentations to boost performance. We demonstrate our method on indoor (VOID) and outdoor (KITTI) datasets where we improve upon three existing methods by an average of 10.4\% across both datasets.
We discover the presence of quantization artifacts in Vision Transformers (ViTs), which arise due to the image tokenization step inherent in these architectures. These artifacts result in coarsely quantized features, which negatively impact performance, especially on downstream dense prediction tasks. We present a zero-shot method to improve how pre-trained ViTs handle spatial quantization. In particular, we propose to ensemble the features obtained from perturbing input images via sub-token spatial translations, inspired by Stochastic Resonance, a method traditionally applied to climate dynamics and signal processing. We term our method ``Stochastic Resonance Transformer" (SRT), which we show can effectively super-resolve features of pre-trained ViTs, capturing more of the local fine-grained structures that might otherwise be neglected as a result of tokenization. SRT can be applied at any layer, on any task, and does not require any fine-tuning. The advantage of the former is evident when applied to monocular depth prediction, where we show that ensembling model outputs are detrimental while applying SRT on intermediate ViT features outperforms the baseline models by an average of 4.7% and 14.9% on the RMSE and RMSE-log metrics across three different architectures. When applied to semi-supervised video object segmentation, SRT also improves over the baseline models uniformly across all metrics, and by an average of 2.4% in F&J score. We further show that these quantization artifacts can be attenuated to some extent via self-distillation. On the unsupervised salient region segmentation, SRT improves upon the base model by an average of 2.1% on the maxF metric. Finally, despite operating purely on pixel-level features, SRT generalizes to non-dense prediction tasks such as image retrieval and object discovery, yielding consistent improvements of up to 2.6% and 1.0% respectively.
We introduce Tangent Attention Fine-Tuning (TAFT), a method for fine-tuning linearized transformers obtained by computing a First-order Taylor Expansion around a pre-trained initialization. We show that the Jacobian-Vector Product resulting from linearization can be computed efficiently in a single forward pass, reducing training and inference cost to the same order of magnitude as its original non-linear counterpart, while using the same number of parameters. Furthermore, we show that, when applied to various downstream visual classification tasks, the resulting Tangent Transformer fine-tuned with TAFT can perform comparably with fine-tuning the original non-linear network. Since Tangent Transformers are linear with respect to the new set of weights, and the resulting fine-tuning loss is convex, we show that TAFT enjoys several advantages compared to non-linear fine-tuning when it comes to model composition, parallel training, machine unlearning, and differential privacy.
Tangent Model Composition (TMC) is a method to combine component models independently fine-tuned around a pre-trained point. Component models are tangent vectors to the pre-trained model that can be added, scaled, or subtracted to support incremental learning, ensembling, or unlearning. Component models are composed at inference time via scalar combination, reducing the cost of ensembling to that of a single model. TMC improves accuracy by 4.2% compared to ensembling non-linearly fine-tuned models at a 2.5x to 10x reduction of inference cost, growing linearly with the number of component models. Each component model can be forgotten at zero cost, with no residual effect on the resulting inference. When used for continual fine-tuning, TMC is not constrained by sequential bias and can be executed in parallel on federated data. TMC outperforms recently published continual fine-tuning methods almost uniformly on each setting -- task-incremental, class-incremental, and data-incremental -- on a total of 13 experiments across 3 benchmark datasets, despite not using any replay buffer. TMC is designed for composing models that are local to a pre-trained embedding, but could be extended to more general settings.
We tackle the question of whether an agent can, by suitable choice of prompts, control an AI bot to any state. To that end, we first introduce a formal definition of ``meaning'' that is amenable to analysis. Then, we characterize ``meaningful data'' on which large language models (LLMs) are ostensibly trained, and ``well-trained LLMs'' through conditions that are largely met by today's LLMs. While a well-trained LLM constructs an embedding space of meanings that is Euclidean, meanings themselves do not form a vector (linear) subspace, but rather a quotient space within. We then characterize the subset of meanings that can be reached by the state of the LLMs for some input prompt, and show that a well-trained bot can reach any meaning albeit with small probability. We then introduce a stronger notion of controllability as {\em almost certain reachability}, and show that, when restricted to the space of meanings, an AI bot is controllable. We do so after introducing a functional characterization of attentive AI bots, and finally derive necessary and sufficient conditions for controllability. The fact that AI bots are controllable means that an adversary could steer them towards any state. However, the sampling process can be designed to counteract adverse actions and avoid reaching undesirable regions of state space before their boundary is crossed.
We introduce Train/Test-Time Adaptation with Retrieval (${\rm T^3AR}$), a method to adapt models both at train and test time by means of a retrieval module and a searchable pool of external samples. Before inference, ${\rm T^3AR}$ adapts a given model to the downstream task using refined pseudo-labels and a self-supervised contrastive objective function whose noise distribution leverages retrieved real samples to improve feature adaptation on the target data manifold. The retrieval of real images is key to ${\rm T^3AR}$ since it does not rely solely on synthetic data augmentations to compensate for the lack of adaptation data, as typically done by other adaptation algorithms. Furthermore, thanks to the retrieval module, our method gives the user or service provider the possibility to improve model adaptation on the downstream task by incorporating further relevant data or to fully remove samples that may no longer be available due to changes in user preference after deployment. First, we show that ${\rm T^3AR}$ can be used at training time to improve downstream fine-grained classification over standard fine-tuning baselines, and the fewer the adaptation data the higher the relative improvement (up to 13%). Second, we apply ${\rm T^3AR}$ for test-time adaptation and show that exploiting a pool of external images at test-time leads to more robust representations over existing methods on DomainNet-126 and VISDA-C, especially when few adaptation data are available (up to 8%).