Foundation Models for Biomedical Image Segmentation: A Survey

Recent advancements in biomedical image analysis have been significantly driven by the Segment Anything Model (SAM). This transformative technology, originally developed for general-purpose computer vision, has found rapid application in medical image processing. Within the last year, marked by over 100 publications, SAM has demonstrated its prowess in zero-shot learning adaptations for medical imaging. The fundamental premise of SAM lies in its capability to segment or identify objects in images without prior knowledge of the object type or imaging modality. This approach aligns well with tasks achievable by the human visual system, though its application in non-biological vision contexts remains more theoretically challenging. A notable feature of SAM is its ability to adjust segmentation according to a specified resolution scale or area of interest, akin to semantic priming. This adaptability has spurred a wave of creativity and innovation in applying SAM to medical imaging. Our review focuses on the period from April 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023, a critical first six months post-initial publication. We examine the adaptations and integrations of SAM necessary to address longstanding clinical challenges, particularly in the context of 33 open datasets covered in our analysis. While SAM approaches or achieves state-of-the-art performance in numerous applications, it falls short in certain areas, such as segmentation of the carotid artery, adrenal glands, optic nerve, and mandible bone. Our survey delves into the innovative techniques where SAM's foundational approach excels and explores the core concepts in translating and applying these models effectively in diverse medical imaging scenarios.

LLM Calibration and Automatic Hallucination Detection via Pareto Optimal Self-supervision

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities out of box for a wide range of applications, yet accuracy still remains a major growth area, especially in mission-critical domains such as biomedicine. An effective method to calibrate the confidence level on LLM responses is essential to automatically detect errors and facilitate human-in-the-loop verification. An important source of calibration signals stems from expert-stipulated programmatic supervision, which is often available at low cost but has its own limitations such as noise and coverage. In this paper, we introduce a Pareto optimal self-supervision framework that can leverage available programmatic supervision to systematically calibrate LLM responses by producing a risk score for every response, without any additional manual efforts. This is accomplished by learning a harmonizer model to align LLM output with other available supervision sources, which would assign higher risk scores to more uncertain LLM responses and facilitate error correction. Experiments on standard relation extraction tasks in biomedical and general domains demonstrate the promise of this approach, with our proposed risk scores highly correlated with the real error rate of LLMs. For the most uncertain test instances, dynamic prompting based on our proposed risk scores results in significant accuracy improvement for off-the-shelf LLMs, boosting GPT-3 results past state-of-the-art (SOTA) weak supervision and GPT-4 results past SOTA supervised results on challenging evaluation datasets.

Automatic Calibration and Error Correction for Large Language Models via Pareto Optimal Self-Supervision

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities out of box for a wide range of applications, yet accuracy still remains a major growth area, especially in mission-critical domains such as biomedicine. An effective method to calibrate the confidence level on LLM responses is essential to automatically detect errors and facilitate human-in-the-loop verification. An important source of calibration signals stems from expert-stipulated programmatic supervision, which is often available at low cost but has its own limitations such as noise and coverage. In this paper, we introduce a Pareto optimal self-supervision framework that can leverage available programmatic supervision to systematically calibrate LLM responses by producing a risk score for every response, without any additional manual efforts. This is accomplished by learning a harmonizer model to align LLM output with other available supervision sources, which would assign higher risk scores to more uncertain LLM responses and facilitate error correction. Experiments on standard relation extraction tasks in biomedical and general domains demonstrate the promise of this approach, with our proposed risk scores highly correlated with the real error rate of LLMs. For the most uncertain test instances, dynamic prompting based on our proposed risk scores results in significant accuracy improvement for off-the-shelf LLMs, boosting GPT-3 results past state-of-the-art (SOTA) weak supervision and GPT-4 results past SOTA supervised results on challenging evaluation datasets.