Alert button
Picture for Sujay Kakarmath

Sujay Kakarmath

Alert button

Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk using Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning

May 09, 2023
Wei-Hung Weng, Sebastien Baur, Mayank Daswani, Christina Chen, Lauren Harrell, Sujay Kakarmath, Mariam Jabara, Babak Behsaz, Cory Y. McLean, Yossi Matias, Greg S. Corrado, Shravya Shetty, Shruthi Prabhakara, Yun Liu, Goodarz Danaei, Diego Ardila

Figure 1 for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk using Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning
Figure 2 for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk using Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning
Figure 3 for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk using Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning
Figure 4 for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk using Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are responsible for a large proportion of premature deaths in low- and middle-income countries. Early CVD detection and intervention is critical in these populations, yet many existing CVD risk scores require a physical examination or lab measurements, which can be challenging in such health systems due to limited accessibility. Here we investigated the potential to use photoplethysmography (PPG), a sensing technology available on most smartphones that can potentially enable large-scale screening at low cost, for CVD risk prediction. We developed a deep learning PPG-based CVD risk score (DLS) to predict the probability of having major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death) within ten years, given only age, sex, smoking status and PPG as predictors. We compared the DLS with the office-based refit-WHO score, which adopts the shared predictors from WHO and Globorisk scores (age, sex, smoking status, height, weight and systolic blood pressure) but refitted on the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort. In UKB cohort, DLS's C-statistic (71.1%, 95% CI 69.9-72.4) was non-inferior to office-based refit-WHO score (70.9%, 95% CI 69.7-72.2; non-inferiority margin of 2.5%, p<0.01). The calibration of the DLS was satisfactory, with a 1.8% mean absolute calibration error. Adding DLS features to the office-based score increased the C-statistic by 1.0% (95% CI 0.6-1.4). DLS predicts ten-year MACE risk comparable with the office-based refit-WHO score. It provides a proof-of-concept and suggests the potential of a PPG-based approach strategies for community-based primary prevention in resource-limited regions.

* main: 24 pages (3 tables, 2 figures, 42 references), supplementary: 25 pages (9 tables, 4 figures, 11 references) 
Viaarxiv icon

Deploying clinical machine learning? Consider the following...

Sep 14, 2021
Charles Lu, Ken Chang, Praveer Singh, Stuart Pomerantz, Sean Doyle, Sujay Kakarmath, Christopher Bridge, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer

Figure 1 for Deploying clinical machine learning? Consider the following...

Despite the intense attention and investment into clinical machine learning (CML) research, relatively few applications convert to clinical practice. While research is important in advancing the state-of-the-art, translation is equally important in bringing these technologies into a position to ultimately impact patient care and live up to extensive expectations surrounding AI in healthcare. To better characterize a holistic perspective among researchers and practitioners, we survey several participants with experience in developing CML for clinical deployment about their learned experiences. We collate these insights and identify several main categories of barriers and pitfalls in order to better design and develop clinical machine learning applications.

Viaarxiv icon