Generative latent diffusion models hold a wide range of applications in the medical imaging domain. A noteworthy application is privacy-preserved open-data sharing by proposing synthetic data as surrogates of real patient data. Despite the promise, these models are susceptible to patient data memorization, where models generate patient data copies instead of novel synthetic samples. This undermines the whole purpose of preserving patient data and may even result in patient re-identification. Considering the importance of the problem, surprisingly it has received relatively little attention in the medical imaging community. To this end, we assess memorization in latent diffusion models for medical image synthesis. We train 2D and 3D latent diffusion models on CT, MR, and X-ray datasets for synthetic data generation. Afterwards, we examine the amount of training data memorized utilizing self-supervised models and further investigate various factors that can possibly lead to memorization by training models in different settings. We observe a surprisingly large amount of data memorization among all datasets, with up to 41.7%, 19.6%, and 32.6% of the training data memorized in CT, MRI, and X-ray datasets respectively. Further analyses reveal that increasing training data size and using data augmentation reduce memorization, while over-training enhances it. Overall, our results suggest a call for memorization-informed evaluation of synthetic data prior to open-data sharing.
Generative latent diffusion models have been established as state-of-the-art in data generation. One promising application is generation of realistic synthetic medical imaging data for open data sharing without compromising patient privacy. Despite the promise, the capacity of such models to memorize sensitive patient training data and synthesize samples showing high resemblance to training data samples is relatively unexplored. Here, we assess the memorization capacity of 3D latent diffusion models on photon-counting coronary computed tomography angiography and knee magnetic resonance imaging datasets. To detect potential memorization of training samples, we utilize self-supervised models based on contrastive learning. Our results suggest that such latent diffusion models indeed memorize training data, and there is a dire need for devising strategies to mitigate memorization.
Purpose: The development of machine learning models for surgical workflow and instrument recognition from temporal data represents a challenging task due to the complex nature of surgical workflows. In particular, the imbalanced distribution of data is one of the major challenges in the domain of surgical workflow recognition. In order to obtain meaningful results, careful partitioning of data into training, validation, and test sets, as well as the selection of suitable evaluation metrics are crucial. Methods: In this work, we present an openly available web-based application that enables interactive exploration of dataset partitions. The proposed visual framework facilitates the assessment of dataset splits for surgical workflow recognition, especially with regard to identifying sub-optimal dataset splits. Currently, it supports visualization of surgical phase and instrument annotations. Results: In order to validate the dedicated interactive visualizations, we use a dataset split of the Cholec80 dataset. This dataset split was specifically selected to reflect a case of strong data imbalance. Using our software, we were able to identify phases, phase transitions, and combinations of surgical instruments that were not represented in one of the sets. Conclusion: In order to obtain meaningful results in highly unbalanced class distributions, special care should be taken with respect to the selection of an appropriate split. Interactive data visualization represents a promising approach for the assessment of machine learning datasets. The source code is available at https://github.com/Cardio-AI/endovis-ml
International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multi-center study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and postprocessing (66%). The "typical" lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.
The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps.
Recent advances in computer vision have shown promising results in image generation. Diffusion probabilistic models in particular have generated realistic images from textual input, as demonstrated by DALL-E 2, Imagen and Stable Diffusion. However, their use in medicine, where image data typically comprises three-dimensional volumes, has not been systematically evaluated. Synthetic images may play a crucial role in privacy preserving artificial intelligence and can also be used to augment small datasets. Here we show that diffusion probabilistic models can synthesize high quality medical imaging data, which we show for Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) images. We provide quantitative measurements of their performance through a reader study with two medical experts who rated the quality of the synthesized images in three categories: Realistic image appearance, anatomical correctness and consistency between slices. Furthermore, we demonstrate that synthetic images can be used in a self-supervised pre-training and improve the performance of breast segmentation models when data is scarce (dice score 0.91 vs. 0.95 without vs. with synthetic data).
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) sequences visualise the cardiac function voxel-wise over time. Simultaneously, deep learning-based deformable image registration is able to estimate discrete vector fields which warp one time step of a CMR sequence to the following in a self-supervised manner. However, despite the rich source of information included in these 3D+t vector fields, a standardised interpretation is challenging and the clinical applications remain limited so far. In this work, we show how to efficiently use a deformable vector field to describe the underlying dynamic process of a cardiac cycle in form of a derived 1D motion descriptor. Additionally, based on the expected cardiovascular physiological properties of a contracting or relaxing ventricle, we define a set of rules that enables the identification of five cardiovascular phases including the end-systole (ES) and end-diastole (ED) without the usage of labels. We evaluate the plausibility of the motion descriptor on two challenging multi-disease, -center, -scanner short-axis CMR datasets. First, by reporting quantitative measures such as the periodic frame difference for the extracted phases. Second, by comparing qualitatively the general pattern when we temporally resample and align the motion descriptors of all instances across both datasets. The average periodic frame difference for the ED, ES key phases of our approach is $0.80\pm{0.85}$, $0.69\pm{0.79}$ which is slightly better than the inter-observer variability ($1.07\pm{0.86}$, $0.91\pm{1.6}$) and the supervised baseline method ($1.18\pm{1.91}$, $1.21\pm{1.78}$). Code and labels will be made available on our GitHub repository. https://github.com/Cardio-AI/cmr-phase-detection
Differential privacy (DP) has arisen as the gold standard in protecting an individual's privacy in datasets by adding calibrated noise to each data sample. While the application to categorical data is straightforward, its usability in the context of images has been limited. Contrary to categorical data the meaning of an image is inherent in the spatial correlation of neighboring pixels making the simple application of noise infeasible. Invertible Neural Networks (INN) have shown excellent generative performance while still providing the ability to quantify the exact likelihood. Their principle is based on transforming a complicated distribution into a simple one e.g. an image into a spherical Gaussian. We hypothesize that adding noise to the latent space of an INN can enable differentially private image modification. Manipulation of the latent space leads to a modified image while preserving important details. Further, by conditioning the INN on meta-data provided with the dataset we aim at leaving dimensions important for downstream tasks like classification untouched while altering other parts that potentially contain identifying information. We term our method content-aware differential privacy (CADP). We conduct experiments on publicly available benchmarking datasets as well as dedicated medical ones. In addition, we show the generalizability of our method to categorical data. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Cardio-AI/CADP.
Multi-object tracking (MOT) is a challenging task that involves detecting objects in the scene and tracking them across a sequence of frames. Evaluating this task is difficult due to temporal occlusions, and varying trajectories across a sequence of images. The main evaluation metric to benchmark MOT methods on datasets such as KITTI has recently become the higher order tracking accuracy (HOTA) metric, which is capable of providing a better description of the performance over metrics such as MOTA, DetA, and IDF1. Point detection and tracking is a closely related task, which could be regarded as a special case of object detection. However, there are differences in evaluating the detection task itself (point distances vs. bounding box overlap). When including the temporal dimension and multi-view scenarios, the evaluation task becomes even more complex. In this work, we propose a multi-view higher order tracking metric (mvHOTA) to determine the accuracy of multi-point (multi-instance and multi-class) detection, while taking into account temporal and spatial associations. mvHOTA can be interpreted as the geometric mean of the detection, association, and correspondence accuracies, thereby providing equal weighting to each of the factors. We demonstrate a use-case through a publicly available endoscopic point detection dataset from a previously organised medical challenge. Furthermore, we compare with other adjusted MOT metrics for this use-case, discuss the properties of mvHOTA, and show how the proposed correspondence accuracy and the Occlusion index facilitate analysis of methods with respect to handling of occlusions. The code will be made publicly available.