Dashboard2Code: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Reconstructing Interactive Dashboards

Automatic data visualization generation has advanced rapidly with multi-modal large language models, yet existing efforts largely focus on static charts and overlook the interactive dashboards commonly used for real-world data exploration. We introduce Dashboard2Code, a novel task that requires a model to proactively explore an interactive dashboard, acquire and integrate feedback from its own interactions (e.g., clicking and filtering), and generate code that reproduces the target dashboard. To support comprehensive evaluation, we present DashboardMimic, the first Plotly+Dash benchmark for Dashboard2Code, comprising 180 carefully designed and manually verified dashboard-code pairs spanning three difficulty levels and covering eight common real-world interaction patterns. We further propose an automated evaluation framework tailored to dashboards that combines code semantic analysis with dynamic interaction-based testing to assess visual and interaction consistency, showing strong agreement with human judgments. Experiments across a range of open- and closed-source multi-modal models reveal that even the strongest systems struggle on high-complexity dashboards and that a substantial performance gap remains between open-source and closed-source models on the Dashboard2Code task.

What You See Is What You Get: Observation-Aligned Supervision for Chart-to-Code Generation

Chart-to-code generation is commonly trained with supervised fine-tuning on reference plotting scripts, implicitly treating the gold code as a fully observable target. We argue that this assumption is often invalid: many chart programs contain latent raw variables that cannot be uniquely recovered from the rendered image. For example, a boxplot exposes summary statistics rather than original samples, a pie chart reveals proportions rather than arbitrary raw values, and a histogram shows bin-level mass rather than individual observations. Supervising models to reproduce such non-identifiable quantities encourages hallucination and over-specified code generation. We introduce Observation-Aligned supervision, a rewriting framework that replaces latent raw-data targets with quantities constrained by the visual observation: box statistics for boxplots, wedge percentages for pie charts, and bin weights for histograms. Applying this framework to chart-to-code training data from two sources, we obtain the Observation-Aligned supervision target data. Experiments across multiple VLMs on ChartMimic and ChartX demonstrate consistent improvements in observable value recovery, including under both-executable evaluation. Our results suggest that improving chart-to-code models requires not only more data or advanced learning objectives or algorithms, but also supervision targets that respect what is identifiable from the chart image.

When Does Language Matter? Multilingual Instructions Reveal Step-wise Language Sensitivity in Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown strong performance in language-conditioned robotic manipulation, yet their robustness to linguistic variation remains poorly understood. In this work, we present the first systematic multilingual evaluation of VLA models by translating the LIBERO benchmark into ten languages, revealing severe performance degradation under non-English instructions, with success rates dropping by 30-50%. Through fine-grained analysis of task executions, we find that language influence is highly non-uniform across steps: certain steps exhibit strong language dependence and dominate overall task failure, while others are largely language-agnostic. Based on this insight, we propose a step-wise inference-time intervention that aligns representations according to step language sensitivity, substantially improving performance under linguistic variation. Our results indicate that language robustness in VLA models is fundamentally a step-wise control problem, highlighting the importance of temporally structured analysis for reliable embodied agents.

From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscape

As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance toward open-ended autonomous agents, the mechanisms used to evaluate and guide their behavior must evolve accordingly. This work introduces the rubric as a unifying framework capturing this evolution, characterizing rubrics as a dynamic response to successive LLM paradigm shifts that recurs across otherwise independent efforts in evaluation, reinforcement learning, and safety alignment. We define rubrics as explicit criteria sets that transform complex quality judgments into structured and actionable standards, and demonstrate that their recurrence across these research threads is not coincidental. We systematically organize existing rubric designs, examine their construction and optimization, and analyze their role across evaluation and training. Rubrics manifest at three progressively deeper levels: at the evaluative level, they decompose holistic judgments into verifiable dimensions; at the training level, they serve as dense feedback signals providing process-level guidance where scalar rewards fall short; at the intrinsic level, they emerge dynamically from model behaviors, driving self-improvement. We further assess rubric reliability across generation quality, execution fidelity, theoretical constraints, and security threats, before surveying rubric-based benchmarks across diverse domains. By rendering assessment transparent and decomposable, rubrics translate human value expectations into machine-learnable signals, serving as the enduring bridge between human intentions and machine behavior.

Scaling Laws for Agent Harnesses via Effective Feedback Compute

Agent harnesses increasingly determine the performance of language-model systems by deciding how models call tools, receive feedback, verify intermediate states, store memory, and revise solutions. Yet current test-time scaling analyses often parameterize this process by raw expenditure -- tokens, tool calls, operations, wall time, or cost -- which does not distinguish useful feedback from redundant or unstable interaction. We introduce \emph{Effective Feedback Compute} (EFC), a trace-level scaling coordinate that credits feedback only when it is informative, valid, non-redundant, and retained for subsequent decisions, and we normalize it by task demand when comparing tasks with different feedback requirements. Across synthetic controllable tasks, executable code tasks, real benchmark traces, held-out splits, and a prospective validation batch, EFC-based coordinates consistently predict failure rates better than raw-compute baselines and a strong multivariate SAS baseline. In controlled scaling, raw tokens and tool calls explain limited variation ($R^2=0.33$ and $0.42$), SAS reaches $0.88$, while Oracle-EFC and Estimated-EFC reach $0.94$ and Oracle-EFC/$D_{\mathrm{task}}$ reaches $0.99$. Matched-budget interventions show that improving feedback quality raises success from $0.27$ to $0.90$ while raw cost and tool calls are fixed. On mixed real traces, NRS-EFC/$D_{\mathrm{task}}$ reaches $R^2=0.92$ while raw compute has near-zero or negative fit, and it remains the best predictor in a prospective holdout ($R^2=0.85$). These results suggest that harness scaling is governed less by how much computation is spent than by how efficiently raw budget is converted into durable, task-sufficient feedback.

EpiBench: Benchmarking Multi-turn Research Workflows for Multimodal Agents

Scientific research follows multi-turn, multi-step workflows that require proactively searching the literature, consulting figures and tables, and integrating evidence across papers to align experimental settings and support reproducible conclusions. This joint capability is not systematically assessed in existing benchmarks, which largely under-evaluate proactive search, multi-evidence integration and sustained evidence use over time. In this work, we introduce EpiBench, an episodic multi-turn multimodal benchmark that instantiates short research workflows. Given a research task, agents must navigate across papers over multiple turns, align evidence from figures and tables, and use the accumulated evidence in the memory to answer objective questions that require cross paper comparisons and multi-figure integration. EpiBench introduces a process-level evaluation framework for fine-grained testing and diagnosis of research agents. Our experiments show that even the leading model achieves an accuracy of only 29.23% on the hard split, indicating substantial room for improvement in multi-turn, multi-evidence research workflows, providing an evaluation platform for verifiable and reproducible research agents.

EchoKV: Efficient KV Cache Compression via Similarity-Based Reconstruction

The increasing memory demand of the Key-Value (KV) cache poses a significant bottleneck for Large Language Models (LLMs) in long-context applications. Existing low-rank compression methods often rely on irreversible parameter transformations, sacrificing the flexibility to switch back to full-precision inference when memory is abundant. In this paper, we propose EchoKV, a flexible KV cache compression scheme that enables on-demand transitions between standard and compressed inference. Unlike traditional compression-decompression paradigms, EchoKV utilizes a lightweight network to reconstruct the residual KV components from a partial subset, leveraging intrinsic inter-layer and intra-layer similarities among attention heads. We further introduce a two-stage fine-tuning strategy that allows for rapid, low-cost training (e.g., ~1 A100 GPU-hour for a 7B model). Experimental results on LongBench and RULER demonstrate that EchoKV consistently outperforms existing methods across various compression ratios while maintaining high throughput for short-context scenarios.

Know More, Know Clearer: A Meta-Cognitive Framework for Knowledge Augmentation in Large Language Models

Knowledge augmentation has significantly enhanced the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive tasks. However, existing methods typically operate on the simplistic premise that model performance equates with internal knowledge, overlooking the knowledge-confidence gaps that lead to overconfident errors or uncertain truths. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel meta-cognitive framework for reliable knowledge augmentation via differentiated intervention and alignment. Our approach leverages internal cognitive signals to partition the knowledge space into mastered, confused, and missing regions, guiding targeted knowledge expansion. Furthermore, we introduce a cognitive consistency mechanism to synchronize subjective certainty with objective accuracy, ensuring calibrated knowledge boundaries. Extensive experiments demonstrate the our framework consistently outperforms strong baselines, validating its rationality in not only enhancing knowledge capabilities but also fostering cognitive behaviors that better distinguish knowns from unknowns.

When Does Context Help? Error Dynamics of Contextual Information in Large Language Models

Contextual information at inference time, such as demonstrations, retrieved knowledge, or interaction history, can substantially improve large language models (LLMs) without parameter updates, yet its theoretical role remains poorly understood beyond specific settings such as in-context learning (ICL). We present a unified theoretical framework for analyzing the effect of arbitrary contextual information in Transformer-based LLMs. Our analysis characterizes contextual influence through output error dynamics. In a single-layer Transformer, we prove that the context-conditioned error vector decomposes additively into the baseline error vector and a contextual correction vector. This yields necessary geometric conditions for error reduction: the contextual correction must align with the negative baseline error and satisfy a norm constraint. We further show that the contextual correction norm admits an explicit upper bound determined by context-query relevance and complementarity. These results extend to multi-context and multi-layer Transformers. Experiments across ICL, retrieval-augmented generation, and memory evolution validate our theory and motivate a principled context selection strategy that improves performance by $0.6\%$.

How Do Language Models Understand Tables? A Mechanistic Analysis of Cell Location

While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for table-related tasks, the internal mechanisms enabling them to process linearized two-dimensional structured tables remain opaque. In this work, we investigate the process of table understanding by dissecting the atomic task of cell location. Through activation patching and complementary interpretability techniques, we delineate the table understanding mechanism into a sequential three-stage pipeline: Semantic Binding, Coordinate Localization, and Information Extraction. We demonstrate that models locate the target cell via an ordinal mechanism that counts discrete delimiters to resolve coordinates. Furthermore, column indices are encoded within a linear subspace that allows for precise steering of model focus through vector arithmetic. Finally, we reveal that models generalize to multi-cell location tasks by multiplexing the identical attention heads identified during atomic location. Our findings provide a comprehensive explanation of table understanding within Transformer architectures.