Randomized Least Squares Value Iteration itself is Joint Differentially Private

As reinforcement learning (RL) increasingly applies to sensitive domains, such as health care and recommendation systems, privacy-preserving techniques have become essential to protect users' sensitive information. We investigate privacy-preserving RL under an episodic setting, focusing on algorithms based on randomized exploration, such as Randomized Least Squares Value Iteration (RLSVI). The overall goal is to study how randomized exploration interacts with the injected noise required by privacy mechanisms. In this work, we show a new privacy analysis that characterizes how the noise in RLSVI set for exploration simultaneously provides privacy protection. Specifically, we prove that RLSVI is $(\varepsilon(δ),δ)$-joint differentially private in tabular MDP as is with $\varepsilon(δ) = \frac{2AK}{H^2\log(2HSA)} + 2\sqrt{\frac{2AK\log(1/δ)}{H^2\log(2HSA)}}$, where $S$ and $A$ are the number of states and actions respectively, $H$ is the length of an episode and $K$ is the number of episodes.

Fairness in two-player zero-sum games with bandit feedback

We study two-player zero-sum games (TPZSGs) with bandit feedback under fairness constraints requiring every action to be played with probability at least $α/m$. Existing instance-dependent results target $\textit{pure}$ Nash equilibria, while fairness generically produces $\textit{mixed}$ equilibria, a harder learning target. Our key technical tool is a reparametrization: every fair strategy decomposes as $p = (α/m)\mathbf{1} + (1-α)\widetilde{p}$ with $\widetilde{p} \in Δ_m$, and substituting into the payoff form yields $p^{\top}Aq = \widetilde{p}^{\top}\widetilde{A} q$ for a fair payoff matrix $\widetilde{A} := (1-α)A + α\mathbf{1} c^{\top}$, where $c_j = \tfrac{1}{m}\sum_i A(i,j)$ is the column-mean vector. The fair game on $A$ is then equivalent to a standard zero-sum game on $\widetilde{A}$, so equilibrium existence, KKT structure, and LP basis stability reduce to classical results applied to $\widetilde{A}$. We derive the fair minimax value, fair Nash equilibrium, fair regret, and a clean dual representation showing the price of fairness is at most $α(1-1/m)$ and vanishes whenever the unconstrained equilibrium already has full support. Our main result is an $\widetilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret bound for an Explore-Then-Commit algorithm, $\texttt{Fair-ETC-TPZSG}$, applicable to general mixed fair equilibria, together with a discussion of why naive action elimination does not readily improve it. When the fair equilibrium has a single dominant action, equivalently when $\widetilde{p}^{\star}$ is a vertex of $Δ_m$, the bound sharpens to instance-dependent $\widetilde{O}(1/\widetildeΔ(α)^{2})$, where $\widetildeΔ(α)$ is the LP-margin gap.

Best-of-Both-Worlds Multi-Dueling Bandits: Unified Algorithms for Stochastic and Adversarial Preferences under Condorcet and Borda Objectives

Multi-dueling bandits, where a learner selects $m \geq 2$ arms per round and observes only the winner, arise naturally in many applications including ranking and recommendation systems, yet a fundamental question has remained open: can a single algorithm perform optimally in both stochastic and adversarial environments, without knowing which regime it faces? We answer this affirmatively, providing the first best-of-both-worlds algorithms for multi-dueling bandits under both Condorcet and Borda objectives. For the Condorcet setting, we propose \texttt{MetaDueling}, a black-box reduction that converts any dueling bandit algorithm into a multi-dueling bandit algorithm by transforming multi-way winner feedback into an unbiased pairwise signal. Instantiating our reduction with \texttt{Versatile-DB} yields the first best-of-both-worlds algorithm for multi-dueling bandits: it achieves $O(\sqrt{KT})$ pseudo-regret against adversarial preferences and the instance-optimal $O\!\left(\sum_{i \neq a^\star} \frac{\log T}{Δ_i}\right)$ pseudo-regret under stochastic preferences, both simultaneously and without prior knowledge of the regime. For the Borda setting, we propose \AlgBorda, a stochastic-and-adversarial algorithm that achieves $O\left(K^2 \log KT + K \log^2 T + \sum_{i: Δ_i^{\mathrm{B}} > 0} \frac{K\log KT}{(Δ_i^{\mathrm{B}})^2}\right)$ regret in stochastic environments and $O\left(K \sqrt{T \log KT} + K^{1/3} T^{2/3} (\log K)^{1/3}\right)$ regret against adversaries, again without prior knowledge of the regime. We complement our upper bounds with matching lower bounds for the Condorcet setting. For the Borda setting, our upper bounds are near-optimal with respect to the lower bounds (within a factor of $K$) and match the best-known results in the literature.

Evaluating Causal Discovery Algorithms for Path-Specific Fairness and Utility in Healthcare

Causal discovery in health data faces evaluation challenges when ground truth is unknown. We address this by collaborating with experts to construct proxy ground-truth graphs, establishing benchmarks for synthetic Alzheimer's disease and heart failure clinical records data. We evaluate the Peter-Clark, Greedy Equivalence Search, and Fast Causal Inference algorithms on structural recovery and path-specific fairness decomposition, going beyond composite fairness scores. On synthetic data, Peter-Clark achieved the best structural recovery. On heart failure data, Fast Causal Inference achieved the highest utility. For path-specific effects, ejection fraction contributed 3.37 percentage points to the indirect effect in the ground truth. These differences drove variations in the fairness-utility ratio across algorithms. Our results highlight the need for graph-aware fairness evaluation and fine-grained path-specific analysis when deploying causal discovery in clinical applications.

Adversarial Multi-dueling Bandits

We introduce the problem of regret minimization in adversarial multi-dueling bandits. While adversarial preferences have been studied in dueling bandits, they have not been explored in multi-dueling bandits. In this setting, the learner is required to select $m \geq 2$ arms at each round and observes as feedback the identity of the most preferred arm which is based on an arbitrary preference matrix chosen obliviously. We introduce a novel algorithm, MiDEX (Multi Dueling EXP3), to learn from such preference feedback that is assumed to be generated from a pairwise-subset choice model. We prove that the expected cumulative $T$-round regret of MiDEX compared to a Borda-winner from a set of $K$ arms is upper bounded by $O((K \log K)^{1/3} T^{2/3})$. Moreover, we prove a lower bound of $\Omega(K^{1/3} T^{2/3})$ for the expected regret in this setting which demonstrates that our proposed algorithm is near-optimal.

Investigating Gender Fairness in Machine Learning-driven Personalized Care for Chronic Pain

This study investigates gender fairness in personalized pain care recommendations using machine learning algorithms. Leveraging a contextual bandits framework, personalized recommendations are formulated and evaluated using LinUCB algorithm on a dataset comprising interactions with $164$ patients across $10$ sessions each. Results indicate that while adjustments to algorithm parameters influence the quality of pain care recommendations, this impact remains consistent across genders. However, when certain patient information, such as self-reported pain measurements, is absent, the quality of pain care recommendations for women is notably inferior to that for men.

Provably Efficient Exploration in Constrained Reinforcement Learning:Posterior Sampling Is All You Need

We present a new algorithm based on posterior sampling for learning in constrained Markov decision processes (CMDP) in the infinite-horizon undiscounted setting. The algorithm achieves near-optimal regret bounds while being advantageous empirically compared to the existing algorithms. Our main theoretical result is a Bayesian regret bound for each cost component of \tilde{O} (HS \sqrt{AT}) for any communicating CMDP with S states, A actions, and bound on the hitting time H. This regret bound matches the lower bound in order of time horizon T and is the best-known regret bound for communicating CMDPs in the infinite-horizon undiscounted setting. Empirical results show that, despite its simplicity, our posterior sampling algorithm outperforms the existing algorithms for constrained reinforcement learning.

Multi-Armed Bandits with Generalized Temporally-Partitioned Rewards

Decision-making problems of sequential nature, where decisions made in the past may have an impact on the future, are used to model many practically important applications. In some real-world applications, feedback about a decision is delayed and may arrive via partial rewards that are observed with different delays. Motivated by such scenarios, we propose a novel problem formulation called multi-armed bandits with generalized temporally-partitioned rewards. To formalize how feedback about a decision is partitioned across several time steps, we introduce $\beta$-spread property. We derive a lower bound on the performance of any uniformly efficient algorithm for the considered problem. Moreover, we provide an algorithm called TP-UCB-FR-G and prove an upper bound on its performance measure. In some scenarios, our upper bound improves upon the state of the art. We provide experimental results validating the proposed algorithm and our theoretical results.

Curiosity-driven Exploration in Sparse-reward Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

Sparsity of rewards while applying a deep reinforcement learning method negatively affects its sample-efficiency. A viable solution to deal with the sparsity of rewards is to learn via intrinsic motivation which advocates for adding an intrinsic reward to the reward function to encourage the agent to explore the environment and expand the sample space. Though intrinsic motivation methods are widely used to improve data-efficient learning in the reinforcement learning model, they also suffer from the so-called detachment problem. In this article, we discuss the limitations of intrinsic curiosity module in sparse-reward multi-agent reinforcement learning and propose a method called I-Go-Explore that combines the intrinsic curiosity module with the Go-Explore framework to alleviate the detachment problem.

Local Differential Privacy for Sequential Decision Making in a Changing Environment

We study the problem of preserving privacy while still providing high utility in sequential decision making scenarios in a changing environment. We consider abruptly changing environment: the environment remains constant during periods and it changes at unknown time instants. To formulate this problem, we propose a variant of multi-armed bandits called non-stationary stochastic corrupt bandits. We construct an algorithm called SW-KLUCB-CF and prove an upper bound on its utility using the performance measure of regret. The proven regret upper bound for SW-KLUCB-CF is near-optimal in the number of time steps and matches the best known bound for analogous problems in terms of the number of time steps and the number of changes. Moreover, we present a provably optimal mechanism which can guarantee the desired level of local differential privacy while providing high utility.