How Do Medical MLLMs Fail? A Study on Visual Grounding in Medical Images

Generalist multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of vision-language tasks. However, their performance on medical tasks, particularly in zero-shot settings where generalization is critical, remains suboptimal. A key research gap is the limited understanding of why medical MLLMs underperform in medical image interpretation. In this work, we present a pioneering systematic investigation into the visual grounding capabilities of state-of-the-art medical MLLMs. To disentangle visual grounding from semantic grounding, we design VGMED, a novel evaluation dataset developed with expert clinical guidance, explicitly assessing the visual grounding capability of medical MLLMs. We introduce new quantitative metrics and conduct detailed qualitative analyses. Our study across eight state-of-the-art (SOTA) medical MLLMs validates that they often fail to ground their predictions in clinically relevant image regions. We note that this finding is specific to medical image analysis; in contrast, prior work has shown that MLLMs are capable of grounding their predictions in the correct image regions when applied to natural scene images. Motivated by these findings, we propose VGRefine, a simple yet effective inference-time method that refines attention distribution to improve visual grounding in medical settings. Our approach achieves SOTA performance across 6 diverse Med-VQA benchmarks (over 110K VQA samples from 8 imaging modalities) without requiring additional training or external expert models. Overall, our work, for the first time, systematically validates inadequate visual grounding as one of the key contributing factors for medical MLLMs' under-performance. Additional experiments are included in the Supp.

Cross-Linguistic Persona-Driven Data Synthesis for Robust Multimodal Cognitive Decline Detection

Speech-based digital biomarkers represent a scalable, non-invasive frontier for the early identification of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). However, the development of robust diagnostic models remains impeded by acute clinical data scarcity and a lack of interpretable reasoning. Current solutions frequently struggle with cross-lingual generalization and fail to provide the transparent rationales essential for clinical trust. To address these barriers, we introduce SynCog, a novel framework integrating controllable zero-shot multimodal data synthesis with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) deduction fine-tuning. Specifically, SynCog simulates diverse virtual subjects with varying cognitive profiles to effectively alleviate clinical data scarcity. This generative paradigm enables the rapid, zero-shot expansion of clinical corpora across diverse languages, effectively bypassing data bottlenecks in low-resource settings and bolstering the diagnostic performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Leveraging this synthesized dataset, we fine-tune a foundational multimodal backbone using a CoT deduction strategy, empowering the model to explicitly articulate diagnostic thought processes rather than relying on black-box predictions. Extensive experiments on the ADReSS and ADReSSo benchmarks demonstrate that augmenting limited clinical data with synthetic phenotypes yields competitive diagnostic performance, achieving Macro-F1 scores of 80.67% and 78.46%, respectively, outperforming current baseline models. Furthermore, evaluation on an independent real-world Mandarin cohort (CIR-E) demonstrates robust cross-linguistic generalization, attaining a Macro-F1 of 48.71%. These findings constitute a critical step toward providing clinically trustworthy and linguistically inclusive cognitive assessment tools for global healthcare.