Bayesian Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for Large Action Spaces

In interactive systems, actions are often correlated, presenting an opportunity for more sample-efficient off-policy evaluation (OPE) and learning (OPL) in large action spaces. We introduce a unified Bayesian framework to capture these correlations through structured and informative priors. In this framework, we propose sDM, a generic Bayesian approach designed for OPE and OPL, grounded in both algorithmic and theoretical foundations. Notably, sDM leverages action correlations without compromising computational efficiency. Moreover, inspired by online Bayesian bandits, we introduce Bayesian metrics that assess the average performance of algorithms across multiple problem instances, deviating from the conventional worst-case assessments. We analyze sDM in OPE and OPL, highlighting the benefits of leveraging action correlations. Empirical evidence showcases the strong performance of sDM.

Diffusion Models Meet Contextual Bandits with Large Action Spaces

Efficient exploration is a key challenge in contextual bandits due to the large size of their action space, where uninformed exploration can result in computational and statistical inefficiencies. Fortunately, the rewards of actions are often correlated and this can be leveraged to explore them efficiently. In this work, we capture such correlations using pre-trained diffusion models; upon which we design diffusion Thompson sampling (dTS). Both theoretical and algorithmic foundations are developed for dTS, and empirical evaluation also shows its favorable performance.

Prior-Dependent Allocations for Bayesian Fixed-Budget Best-Arm Identification in Structured Bandits

We study the problem of Bayesian fixed-budget best-arm identification (BAI) in structured bandits. We propose an algorithm that uses fixed allocations based on the prior information and the structure of the environment. We provide theoretical bounds on its performance across diverse models, including the first prior-dependent upper bounds for linear and hierarchical BAI. Our key contribution is introducing new proof methods that result in tighter bounds for multi-armed BAI compared to existing methods. We extensively compare our approach to other fixed-budget BAI methods, demonstrating its consistent and robust performance in various settings. Our work improves our understanding of Bayesian fixed-budget BAI in structured bandits and highlights the effectiveness of our approach in practical scenarios.

Exponential Smoothing for Off-Policy Learning

Off-policy learning (OPL) aims at finding improved policies from logged bandit data, often by minimizing the inverse propensity scoring (IPS) estimator of the risk. In this work, we investigate a smooth regularization for IPS, for which we derive a two-sided PAC-Bayes generalization bound. The bound is tractable, scalable, interpretable and provides learning certificates. In particular, it is also valid for standard IPS without making the assumption that the importance weights are bounded. We demonstrate the relevance of our approach and its favorable performance through a set of learning tasks. Since our bound holds for standard IPS, we are able to provide insight into when regularizing IPS is useful. Namely, we identify cases where regularization might not be needed. This goes against the belief that, in practice, clipped IPS often enjoys favorable performance than standard IPS in OPL.

Offline Evaluation of Reward-Optimizing Recommender Systems: The Case of Simulation

Both in academic and industry-based research, online evaluation methods are seen as the golden standard for interactive applications like recommendation systems. Naturally, the reason for this is that we can directly measure utility metrics that rely on interventions, being the recommendations that are being shown to users. Nevertheless, online evaluation methods are costly for a number of reasons, and a clear need remains for reliable offline evaluation procedures. In industry, offline metrics are often used as a first-line evaluation to generate promising candidate models to evaluate online. In academic work, limited access to online systems makes offline metrics the de facto approach to validating novel methods. Two classes of offline metrics exist: proxy-based methods, and counterfactual methods. The first class is often poorly correlated with the online metrics we care about, and the latter class only provides theoretical guarantees under assumptions that cannot be fulfilled in real-world environments. Here, we make the case that simulation-based comparisons provide ways forward beyond offline metrics, and argue that they are a preferable means of evaluation.

A Scalable Probabilistic Model for Reward Optimizing Slate Recommendation

We introduce Probabilistic Rank and Reward model (PRR), a scalable probabilistic model for personalized slate recommendation. Our model allows state-of-the-art estimation of user interests in the following ubiquitous recommender system scenario: A user is shown a slate of K recommendations and the user chooses at most one of these K items. It is the goal of the recommender system to find the K items of most interest to a user in order to maximize the probability that the user interacts with the slate. Our contribution is to show that we can learn more effectively the probability of the recommendations being successful by combining the reward - whether the slate was clicked or not - and the rank - the item on the slate that was selected. Our method learns more efficiently than bandit methods that use only the reward, and user preference methods that use only the rank. It also provides similar or better estimation performance to independent inverse-propensity-score methods and is far more scalable. Our method is state of the art in terms of both speed and accuracy on massive datasets with up to 1 million items. Finally, our method allows fast delivery of recommendations powered by maximum inner product search (MIPS), making it suitable in extremely low latency domains such as computational advertising.

Generalizing Hierarchical Bayesian Bandits

A contextual bandit is a popular and practical framework for online learning to act under uncertainty. In many problems, the number of actions is huge and their mean rewards are correlated. In this work, we introduce a general framework for capturing such correlations through a two-level graphical model where actions are related through multiple shared latent parameters. We propose a Thompson sampling algorithm G-HierTS that uses this structure to explore efficiently and bound its Bayes regret. The regret has two terms, one for learning action parameters and the other for learning the shared latent parameters. The terms reflect the structure of our model as well as the quality of priors. Our theoretical findings are validated empirically using both synthetic and real-world problems. We also experiment with G-HierTS that maintains a factored posterior over latent parameters. While this approximation does not come with guarantees, it improves computational efficiency with a minimal impact on empirical regret.

Combining Reward and Rank Signals for Slate Recommendation

We consider the problem of slate recommendation, where the recommender system presents a user with a collection or slate composed of K recommended items at once. If the user finds the recommended items appealing then the user may click and the recommender system receives some feedback. Two pieces of information are available to the recommender system: was the slate clicked? (the reward), and if the slate was clicked, which item was clicked? (rank). In this paper, we formulate several Bayesian models that incorporate the reward signal (Reward model), the rank signal (Rank model), or both (Full model), for non-personalized slate recommendation. In our experiments, we analyze performance gains of the Full model and show that it achieves significantly lower error as the number of products in the catalog grows or as the slate size increases.