Full-Duplex Interaction in Spoken Dialogue Systems: A Comprehensive Study from the ICASSP 2026 HumDial Challenge

Full-duplex interaction, where speakers and listeners converse simultaneously, is a key element of human communication often missing from traditional spoken dialogue systems. These systems, based on rigid turn-taking paradigms, struggle to respond naturally in dynamic conversations. The Full-Duplex Interaction Track of ICASSP 2026 Human-like Spoken Dialogue Systems Challenge (HumDial Challenge) aims to advance the evaluation of full-duplex systems by offering a framework for handling real-time interruptions, speech overlap, and dynamic turn negotiation. We introduce a comprehensive benchmark for full-duplex spoken dialogue systems, built from the HumDial Challenge. We release a high-quality dual-channel dataset of real human-recorded conversations, capturing interruptions, overlapping speech, and feedback mechanisms. This dataset forms the basis for the HumDial-FDBench benchmark, which assesses a system's ability to handle interruptions while maintaining conversational flow. Additionally, we create a public leaderboard to compare the performance of open-source and proprietary models, promoting transparent, reproducible evaluation. These resources support the development of more responsive, adaptive, and human-like dialogue systems.

HumDial-EIBench: A Human-Recorded Multi-Turn Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Audio Language Models

Evaluating the emotional intelligence (EI) of audio language models (ALMs) is critical. However, existing benchmarks mostly rely on synthesized speech, are limited to single-turn interactions, and depend heavily on open-ended scoring. This paper proposes HumDial-EIBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating ALMs' EI. Using real-recorded human dialogues from the ICASSP 2026 HumDial Challenge, it reformulates emotional tracking and causal reasoning into multiple-choice questions with adversarial distractors, mitigating subjective scoring bias for cognitive tasks. It retains the generation of empathetic responses and introduces an acoustic-semantic conflict task to assess robustness against contradictory multimodal signals. Evaluations of eight ALMs reveal that most models struggle with multi-turn emotional tracking and implicit causal reasoning. Furthermore, all models exhibit decoupled textual and acoustic empathy, alongside a severe text-dominance bias during cross-modal conflicts.