LEDGERMIND: Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger

Multimodal agents for visual question answering increasingly operate as multi-step trajectories that interleave perception, retrieval, and reasoning, yet evaluation still largely reduces to final-answer accuracy. This aggregate signal cannot tell whether a correct answer was reached through grounded evidence, language priors, or accidental error cancellation. We propose to treat a multimodal agent trajectory as a provenance-constrained state machine: tool outputs are normalized into a Structured Evidence Ledger that serves as the trajectory state, downstream reasoning and decision claims may cite only active ledger entries, grounding is checked at the entity and numeric level, and repair is realized as typed state transitions that cannot introduce content without tool-produced provenance. We instantiate this design as LedgerMind (Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger), augmented by a Three-Layer Grounding Protocol, an Adaptive Dual-Path Dispatcher that matches reasoning depth to question complexity, and an Event-Triggered Verification-and-Repair engine with a formal provenance non-amplification guarantee. We use LedgerMind to target four recurring failure patterns that final-answer accuracy tends to obscure: unsupported intermediate reasoning, citation-backed entity hallucination (Phantom Grounding), over-reasoning on simple queries, and repair-time amplification. Experiments across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks and backbone MLLMs show that LedgerMind improves both answer accuracy and trajectory-level faithfulness.

Rethinking Token-Level Credit Assignment in RLVR: A Polarity-Entropy Analysis

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, its sparse outcome-based rewards pose a fundamental credit assignment problem. We analyze this problem through the joint lens of reward polarity and token entropy. Our diagnostic tool, the Four Quadrant Decomposition, isolates token updates by polarity and entropy, and controlled ablations show that reasoning improvements concentrate in the high-entropy quadrants. To justify this observation theoretically, we adapt Conditional Mutual Information to the autoregressive RLVR setting and prove that the credit a token can carry is upper-bounded by its entropy. This view yields testable predictions that reasoning gains arise primarily from high-entropy tokens, with unique roles for positive and negative updates. A gradient analysis of GRPO further reveals how uniform reward broadcast dilutes signal at high-entropy positions while over-crediting deterministic tokens. Grounded in these insights, we propose Entropy-Aware Policy Optimization (EAPO) that modulates token-level learning signals accordingly. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EAPO outperforms strong baselines across two model families.