MAT-Cell: A Multi-Agent Tree-Structured Reasoning Framework for Batch-Level Single-Cell Annotation

Automated cellular reasoning faces a core dichotomy: supervised methods fall into the Reference Trap and fail to generalize to out-of-distribution cell states, while large language models (LLMs), without grounded biological priors, suffer from a Signal-to-Noise Paradox that produces spurious associations. We propose MAT-Cell, a neuro-symbolic reasoning framework that reframes single-cell analysis from black-box classification into constructive, verifiable proof generation. MAT-Cell injects symbolic constraints through adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to ground neural reasoning in biological axioms and reduce transcriptomic noise. It further employs a dialectic verification process with homogeneous rebuttal agents to audit and prune reasoning paths, forming syllogistic derivation trees that enforce logical consistency.Across large-scale and cross-species benchmarks, MAT-Cell significantly outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) models and maintains robust per-formance in challenging scenarios where baselinemethods severely degrade. Code is available at https://gith ub.com/jiangliu91/MAT-Cell-A-Mul ti-Agent-Tree-Structured-Reasoni ng-Framework-for-Batch-Level-Sin gle-Cell-Annotation.

A Medical Multimodal Diagnostic Framework Integrating Vision-Language Models and Logic Tree Reasoning

With the rapid growth of large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) in medicine, simply integrating clinical text and medical imaging does not guarantee reliable reasoning. Existing multimodal models often produce hallucinations or inconsistent chains of thought, limiting clinical trust. We propose a diagnostic framework built upon LLaVA that combines vision-language alignment with logic-regularized reasoning. The system includes an input encoder for text and images, a projection module for cross-modal alignment, a reasoning controller that decomposes diagnostic tasks into steps, and a logic tree generator that assembles stepwise premises into verifiable conclusions. Evaluations on MedXpertQA and other benchmarks show that our method improves diagnostic accuracy and yields more interpretable reasoning traces on multimodal tasks, while remaining competitive on text-only settings. These results suggest a promising step toward trustworthy multimodal medical AI.