Alert button
Picture for David Forsyth

David Forsyth

Alert button

Using Discriminative Methods to Learn Fashion Compatibility Across Datasets

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Jun 17, 2019
Kedan Li, Chen Liu, Ranjitha Kumar, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for Using Discriminative Methods to Learn Fashion Compatibility Across Datasets
Figure 2 for Using Discriminative Methods to Learn Fashion Compatibility Across Datasets
Figure 3 for Using Discriminative Methods to Learn Fashion Compatibility Across Datasets
Figure 4 for Using Discriminative Methods to Learn Fashion Compatibility Across Datasets
Viaarxiv icon

Why do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
May 26, 2019
Bryan A. Plummer, Mariya I. Vasileva, Vitali Petsiuk, Kate Saenko, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for Why do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models
Figure 2 for Why do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models
Figure 3 for Why do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models
Figure 4 for Why do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models
Viaarxiv icon

Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distance and its use for GANs

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Apr 11, 2019
Ishan Deshpande, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ruoyu Sun, Ayis Pyrros, Nasir Siddiqui, Sanmi Koyejo, Zhizhen Zhao, David Forsyth, Alexander Schwing

Figure 1 for Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distance and its use for GANs
Figure 2 for Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distance and its use for GANs
Figure 3 for Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distance and its use for GANs
Figure 4 for Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distance and its use for GANs
Viaarxiv icon

Structural Consistency and Controllability for Diverse Colorization

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Sep 06, 2018
Safa Messaoud, David Forsyth, Alexander G. Schwing

Figure 1 for Structural Consistency and Controllability for Diverse Colorization
Figure 2 for Structural Consistency and Controllability for Diverse Colorization
Figure 3 for Structural Consistency and Controllability for Diverse Colorization
Figure 4 for Structural Consistency and Controllability for Diverse Colorization
Viaarxiv icon

Learning Type-Aware Embeddings for Fashion Compatibility

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Jul 27, 2018
Mariya I. Vasileva, Bryan A. Plummer, Krishna Dusad, Shreya Rajpal, Ranjitha Kumar, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for Learning Type-Aware Embeddings for Fashion Compatibility
Figure 2 for Learning Type-Aware Embeddings for Fashion Compatibility
Figure 3 for Learning Type-Aware Embeddings for Fashion Compatibility
Figure 4 for Learning Type-Aware Embeddings for Fashion Compatibility
Viaarxiv icon

An Approximate Shading Model with Detail Decomposition for Object Relighting

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Apr 20, 2018
Zicheng Liao, Kevin Karsch, Hongyi Zhang, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for An Approximate Shading Model with Detail Decomposition for Object Relighting
Figure 2 for An Approximate Shading Model with Detail Decomposition for Object Relighting
Figure 3 for An Approximate Shading Model with Detail Decomposition for Object Relighting
Figure 4 for An Approximate Shading Model with Detail Decomposition for Object Relighting
Viaarxiv icon

Detecting Anomalous Faces with 'No Peeking' Autoencoders

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Feb 15, 2018
Anand Bhattad, Jason Rock, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for Detecting Anomalous Faces with 'No Peeking' Autoencoders
Figure 2 for Detecting Anomalous Faces with 'No Peeking' Autoencoders
Figure 3 for Detecting Anomalous Faces with 'No Peeking' Autoencoders
Figure 4 for Detecting Anomalous Faces with 'No Peeking' Autoencoders
Viaarxiv icon

Standard detectors aren't (currently) fooled by physical adversarial stop signs

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Oct 26, 2017
Jiajun Lu, Hussein Sibai, Evan Fabry, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for Standard detectors aren't (currently) fooled by physical adversarial stop signs
Figure 2 for Standard detectors aren't (currently) fooled by physical adversarial stop signs
Figure 3 for Standard detectors aren't (currently) fooled by physical adversarial stop signs
Figure 4 for Standard detectors aren't (currently) fooled by physical adversarial stop signs
Viaarxiv icon

SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustly

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Aug 15, 2017
Jiajun Lu, Theerasit Issaranon, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustly
Figure 2 for SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustly
Figure 3 for SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustly
Figure 4 for SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustly
Viaarxiv icon

NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Jul 12, 2017
Jiajun Lu, Hussein Sibai, Evan Fabry, David Forsyth

Figure 1 for NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles
Figure 2 for NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles
Figure 3 for NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles
Figure 4 for NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles
Viaarxiv icon