Ethio-ASR: Joint Multilingual Speech Recognition and Language Identification for Ethiopian Languages

We present Ethio-ASR, a suite of multilingual CTC-based automatic speech recognition (ASR) models jointly trained on five Ethiopian languages: Amharic, Tigrinya, Oromo, Sidaama, and Wolaytta. These languages belong to the Semitic, Cushitic, and Omotic branches of the Afroasiatic family, and remain severely underrepresented in speech technology despite being spoken by the vast majority of Ethiopia's population. We train our models on the recently released WAXAL corpus using several pre-trained speech encoders and evaluate against strong multilingual baselines, including OmniASR. Our best model achieves an average WER of 30.48% on the WAXAL test set, outperforming the best OmniASR model with substantially fewer parameters. We further provide a comprehensive analysis of gender bias, the contribution of vowel length and consonant gemination to ASR errors, and the training dynamics of multilingual CTC models. Our models and codebase are publicly available to the research community.

AmharicStoryQA: A Multicultural Story Question Answering Benchmark in Amharic

With the growing emphasis on multilingual and cultural evaluation benchmarks for large language models, language and culture are often treated as synonymous, and performance is commonly used as a proxy for a models understanding of a given language. In this work, we argue that such evaluations overlook meaningful cultural variation that exists within a single language. We address this gap by focusing on narratives from different regions of Ethiopia and demonstrate that, despite shared linguistic characteristics, region-specific and domain-specific content substantially influences language evaluation outcomes. To this end, we introduce \textbf{\textit{AmharicStoryQA}}, a long-sequence story question answering benchmark grounded in culturally diverse narratives from Amharic-speaking regions. Using this benchmark, we reveal a significant narrative understanding gap in existing LLMs, highlight pronounced regional differences in evaluation results, and show that supervised fine-tuning yields uneven improvements across regions and evaluation settings. Our findings emphasize the need for culturally grounded benchmarks that go beyond language-level evaluation to more accurately assess and improve narrative understanding in low-resource languages.