Unintended Negative Impacts of Promotional Language in Patent Evaluation

Promotional language has been increasingly used to aid the communication of innovative ideas in science. Yet, less is known about its role in the context of technological innovation. Here, we use a validated and domain-diagnosed lexicon of 135 promotional words to study the association between promotional language and patent evaluation outcomes among 2.7 million USPTO patent applications. Our large-scale study reveals three unexpected findings. First, in contrast to scientific evaluation, we find that a higher frequency of promotional words is negatively associated with the probability of an application being (i) granted a patent, (ii) transferred ownership, and (iii) successfully appealed. This promotional penalty holds even after accounting for a range of confounding factors and is largely robust across different technological areas. Among matched samples, the difference in the success rate between the lowest and highest promotional density quintile is 5.5, 5.9, and 5.3 percentage points for patentability, transferability, and rejection reversal. Second, contrary to institutional skepticism, we show that promotional language is not a mask of weak technology, but objectively reflects the degree of combinatorial novelty and future citation impact. Third, digging into the mechanisms, we find that the tolerance to promotional framing is strongly moderated by human factors, with men and experienced examiners showing a higher acceptance of promotional narratives than women and novice examiners. By revealing an emerging paradox in the patent system, our study offers theoretical and practical implications for improving patent evaluation through more objective scrutiny of linguistic patterns in patent filings.

Privacy-Preserving EHR Data Transformation via Geometric Operators: A Human-AI Co-Design Technical Report

Electronic health records (EHRs) and other real-world clinical data are essential for clinical research, medical artificial intelligence, and life science, but their sharing is severely limited by privacy, governance, and interoperability constraints. These barriers create persistent data silos that hinder multi-center studies, large-scale model development, and broader biomedical discovery. Existing privacy-preserving approaches, including multi-party computation and related cryptographic techniques, provide strong protection but often introduce substantial computational overhead, reducing the efficiency of large-scale machine learning and foundation-model training. In addition, many such methods make data usable for restricted computation while leaving them effectively invisible to clinicians and researchers, limiting their value in workflows that still require direct inspection, exploratory analysis, and human interpretation. We propose a real-world-data transformation framework for privacy-preserving sharing of structured clinical records. Instead of converting data into opaque representations, our approach constructs transformed numeric views that preserve medical semantics and major statistical properties while, under a clearly specified threat model, provably breaking direct linkage between those views and protected patient-level attributes. Through collaboration between computer scientists and the AI agent \textbf{SciencePal}, acting as a constrained tool inventor under human guidance, we design three transformation operators that are non-reversible within this threat model, together with an additional mixing strategy for high-risk scenarios, supported by theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation under reconstruction, record linkage, membership inference, and attribute inference attacks.