Quality and Trust in LLM-generated Code

Machine learning models are widely used but can also often be wrong. Users would benefit from a reliable indication of whether a given output from a given model should be trusted, so a rational decision can be made whether to use the output or not. For example, outputs can be associated with a confidence measure; if this confidence measure is strongly associated with likelihood of correctness, then the model is said to be well-calibrated. In this case, for example, high-confidence outputs could be safely accepted, and low-confidence outputs rejected. Calibration has so far been studied in non-generative (e.g., classification) settings, especially in Software Engineering. However, generated code can quite often be wrong: Developers need to know when they should e.g., directly use, use after careful review, or discard model-generated code; thus Calibration is vital in generative settings. However, the notion of correctness of generated code is non-trivial, and thus so is Calibration. In this paper we make several contributions. We develop a framework for evaluating the Calibration of code-generating models. We consider several tasks, correctness criteria, datasets, and approaches, and find that by and large generative code models are not well-calibrated out of the box. We then show how Calibration can be improved, using standard methods such as Platt scaling. Our contributions will lead to better-calibrated decision-making in the current use of code generated by language models, and offers a framework for future research to further improve calibration methods for generative models in Software Engineering.

Question Relatedness on Stack Overflow: The Task, Dataset, and Corpus-inspired Models

Domain-specific community question answering is becoming an integral part of professions. Finding related questions and answers in these communities can significantly improve the effectiveness and efficiency of information seeking. Stack Overflow is one of the most popular communities that is being used by millions of programmers. In this paper, we analyze the problem of predicting knowledge unit (question thread) relatedness in Stack Overflow. In particular, we formulate the question relatedness task as a multi-class classification problem with four degrees of relatedness. We present a large-scale dataset with more than 300K pairs. To the best of our knowledge, this dataset is the largest domain-specific dataset for Question-Question relatedness. We present the steps that we took to collect, clean, process, and assure the quality of the dataset. The proposed dataset Stack Overflow is a useful resource to develop novel solutions, specifically data-hungry neural network models, for the prediction of relatedness in technical community question-answering forums. We adopt a neural network architecture and a traditional model for this task that effectively utilize information from different parts of knowledge units to compute the relatedness between them. These models can be used to benchmark novel models, as they perform well in our task and in a closely similar task.