Defect segmentation: Mapping tunnel lining internal defects with ground penetrating radar data using a convolutional neural network

This research proposes a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data processing method for non-destructive detection of tunnel lining internal defects, called defect segmentation. To perform this critical step of automatic tunnel lining detection, the method uses a CNN called Segnet combined with the Lov\'asz softmax loss function to map the internal defect structure with GPR synthetic data, which improves the accuracy, automation and efficiency of defects detection. The novel method we present overcomes several difficulties of traditional GPR data interpretation as demonstrated by an evaluation on both synthetic and real datas -- to verify the method on real data, a test model containing a known defect was designed and built and GPR data was obtained and analyzed.

GPRInvNet: Deep Learning-Based Ground Penetrating Radar Data Inversion for Tunnel Lining

A DNN architecture called GPRInvNet is proposed to tackle the challenge of mapping Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) B-Scan data to complex permittivity maps of subsurface structure. GPRInvNet consists of a trace-to-trace encoder and a decoder. It is specially designed to take account of the characteristics of GPR inversion when faced with complex GPR B-Scan data as well as addressing the spatial alignment issue between time-series B-Scan data and spatial permittivity maps. It fuses features from several adjacent traces on the B-Scan data to enhance each trace, and then further condense the features of each trace separately. The sensitive zone on the permittivity map spatially aligned to the enhanced trace is reconstructed accurately. GPRInvNet has been utilized to reconstruct the permittivity map of tunnel linings. A diverse range of dielectric models of tunnel lining containing complex defects has been reconstructed using GPRInvNet, and results demonstrate that GPRInvNet is capable of effectively reconstructing complex tunnel lining defects with clear boundaries. Comparative results with existing baseline methods also demonstrate the superiority of the GPRInvNet. To generalize GPRInvNet to real GPR data, we integrated background noise patches recorded form a practical model testing into synthetic GPR data to train GPRInvNet. The model testing has been conducted for validation, and experimental results show that GPRInvNet achieves satisfactory results on real data.