Neural Policy Gradient Methods: Global Optimality and Rates of Convergence

Policy gradient methods with actor-critic schemes demonstrate tremendous empirical successes, especially when the actors and critics are parameterized by neural networks. However, it remains less clear whether such "neural" policy gradient methods converge to globally optimal policies and whether they even converge at all. We answer both the questions affirmatively in the overparameterized regime. In detail, we prove that neural natural policy gradient converges to a globally optimal policy at a sublinear rate. Also, we show that neural vanilla policy gradient converges sublinearly to a stationary point. Meanwhile, by relating the suboptimality of the stationary points to the representation power of neural actor and critic classes, we prove the global optimality of all stationary points under mild regularity conditions. Particularly, we show that a key to the global optimality and convergence is the "compatibility" between the actor and critic, which is ensured by sharing neural architectures and random initializations across the actor and critic. To the best of our knowledge, our analysis establishes the first global optimality and convergence guarantees for neural policy gradient methods.

Fast Multi-Agent Temporal-Difference Learning via Homotopy Stochastic Primal-Dual Optimization

We consider a distributed multi-agent policy evaluation problem in reinforcement learning. In our setup, a group of agents with jointly observed states and private local actions and rewards collaborates to learn the value function of a given policy. When the dimension of state-action space is large, the temporal-difference learning with linear function approximation is widely used. Under the assumption that the samples are i.i.d., the best-known convergence rate for multi-agent temporal-difference learning is $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ minimizing the mean square projected Bellman error. In this paper, we formulate the temporal-difference learning as a distributed stochastic saddle point problem, and propose a new homotopy primal-dual algorithm by adaptively restarting the gradient update from the average of previous iterations. We prove that our algorithm enjoys an $O(1/T)$ convergence rate up to logarithmic factors of $T$, thereby significantly improving the previously-known convergence results on multi-agent temporal-difference learning. Furthermore, since our result explicitly takes into account the Markovian nature of the sampling in policy evaluation, it addresses a broader class of problems than the commonly used i.i.d. sampling scenario. From a stochastic optimization perspective, to the best of our knowledge, the proposed homotopy primal-dual algorithm is the first to achieve $O(1/T)$ convergence rate for distributed stochastic saddle point problem.

Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Modern Reinforcement Learning (RL) is commonly applied to practical problems with an enormous number of states, where function approximation must be deployed to approximate either the value function or the policy. The introduction of function approximation raises a fundamental set of challenges involving computational and statistical efficiency, especially given the need to manage the exploration/exploitation tradeoff. As a result, a core RL question remains open: how can we design provably efficient RL algorithms that incorporate function approximation? This question persists even in a basic setting with linear dynamics and linear rewards, for which only linear function approximation is needed. This paper presents the first provable RL algorithm with both polynomial runtime and polynomial sample complexity in this linear setting, without requiring a "simulator" or additional assumptions. Concretely, we prove that an optimistic modification of Least-Squares Value Iteration (LSVI)---a classical algorithm frequently studied in the linear setting---achieves $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{d^3H^3T})$ regret, where $d$ is the ambient dimension of feature space, $H$ is the length of each episode, and $T$ is the total number of steps. Importantly, such regret is independent of the number of states and actions.

More Supervision, Less Computation: Statistical-Computational Tradeoffs in Weakly Supervised Learning

We consider the weakly supervised binary classification problem where the labels are randomly flipped with probability $1- {\alpha}$. Although there exist numerous algorithms for this problem, it remains theoretically unexplored how the statistical accuracies and computational efficiency of these algorithms depend on the degree of supervision, which is quantified by ${\alpha}$. In this paper, we characterize the effect of ${\alpha}$ by establishing the information-theoretic and computational boundaries, namely, the minimax-optimal statistical accuracy that can be achieved by all algorithms, and polynomial-time algorithms under an oracle computational model. For small ${\alpha}$, our result shows a gap between these two boundaries, which represents the computational price of achieving the information-theoretic boundary due to the lack of supervision. Interestingly, we also show that this gap narrows as ${\alpha}$ increases. In other words, having more supervision, i.e., more correct labels, not only improves the optimal statistical accuracy as expected, but also enhances the computational efficiency for achieving such accuracy.

On the Global Convergence of Actor-Critic: A Case for Linear Quadratic Regulator with Ergodic Cost

Despite the empirical success of the actor-critic algorithm, its theoretical understanding lags behind. In a broader context, actor-critic can be viewed as an online alternating update algorithm for bilevel optimization, whose convergence is known to be fragile. To understand the instability of actor-critic, we focus on its application to linear quadratic regulators, a simple yet fundamental setting of reinforcement learning. We establish a nonasymptotic convergence analysis of actor-critic in this setting. In particular, we prove that actor-critic finds a globally optimal pair of actor (policy) and critic (action-value function) at a linear rate of convergence. Our analysis may serve as a preliminary step towards a complete theoretical understanding of bilevel optimization with nonconvex subproblems, which is NP-hard in the worst case and is often solved using heuristics.

A Communication-Efficient Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Algorithm for Distributed Reinforcement Learning

This paper considers a distributed reinforcement learning problem in which a network of multiple agents aim to cooperatively maximize the globally averaged return through communication with only local neighbors. A randomized communication-efficient multi-agent actor-critic algorithm is proposed for possibly unidirectional communication relationships depicted by a directed graph. It is shown that the algorithm can solve the problem for strongly connected graphs by allowing each agent to transmit only two scalar-valued variables at one time.

Neural Proximal/Trust Region Policy Optimization Attains Globally Optimal Policy

Proximal policy optimization and trust region policy optimization (PPO and TRPO) with actor and critic parametrized by neural networks achieve significant empirical success in deep reinforcement learning. However, due to nonconvexity, the global convergence of PPO and TRPO remains less understood, which separates theory from practice. In this paper, we prove that a variant of PPO and TRPO equipped with overparametrized neural networks converges to the globally optimal policy at a sublinear rate. The key to our analysis is the global convergence of infinite-dimensional mirror descent under a notion of one-point monotonicity, where the gradient and iterate are instantiated by neural networks. In particular, the desirable representation power and optimization geometry induced by the overparametrization of such neural networks allow them to accurately approximate the infinite-dimensional gradient and iterate.

Neural Temporal-Difference Learning Converges to Global Optima

Temporal-difference learning (TD), coupled with neural networks, is among the most fundamental building blocks of deep reinforcement learning. However, due to the nonlinearity in value function approximation, such a coupling leads to nonconvexity and even divergence in optimization. As a result, the global convergence of neural TD remains unclear. In this paper, we prove for the first time that neural TD converges at a sublinear rate to the global optimum of the mean-squared projected Bellman error for policy evaluation. In particular, we show how such global convergence is enabled by the overparametrization of neural networks, which also plays a vital role in the empirical success of neural TD. Beyond policy evaluation, we establish the global convergence of neural (soft) Q-learning, which is further connected to that of policy gradient algorithms.

A Multi-Agent Off-Policy Actor-Critic Algorithm for Distributed Reinforcement Learning

This paper extends off-policy reinforcement learning to the multi-agent case in which a set of networked agents communicating with their neighbors according to a time-varying graph collaboratively evaluates and improves a target policy while following a distinct behavior policy. To this end, the paper develops a multi-agent version of emphatic temporal difference learning for off-policy policy evaluation, and proves convergence under linear function approximation. The paper then leverages this result, in conjunction with a novel multi-agent off-policy policy gradient theorem and recent work in both multi-agent on-policy and single-agent off-policy actor-critic methods, to develop and give convergence guarantees for a new multi-agent off-policy actor-critic algorithm.

On the Global Convergence of Imitation Learning: A Case for Linear Quadratic Regulator

We study the global convergence of generative adversarial imitation learning for linear quadratic regulators, which is posed as minimax optimization. To address the challenges arising from non-convex-concave geometry, we analyze the alternating gradient algorithm and establish its Q-linear rate of convergence to a unique saddle point, which simultaneously recovers the globally optimal policy and reward function. We hope our results may serve as a small step towards understanding and taming the instability in imitation learning as well as in more general non-convex-concave alternating minimax optimization that arises from reinforcement learning and generative adversarial learning.