Thermodynamics-Informed Input Reparameterization for Neural Prediction of Real-Fluid Thermodynamic Properties in Supercritical Combustion

Real-fluid thermodynamic property evaluation is a major computational cost in supercritical combustion simulations. In the enthalpy-based pressure-correction formulation, the closure evaluates temperature T, density $ρ$, and compressibility coefficient $ψ$ from the solver state (h,p,Y) through enthalpy-temperature inversion and repeated real-fluid equation-of-state evaluations. Neural-network surrogates offer fixed-cost inference, but direct mapping from (h,p,Y) to $(T,ρ,ψ)$ must capture the enthalpy-temperature relation and non-ideal equation-of-state response, resulting in a complex regression problem. This work introduces a thermodynamics-informed input reparameterization strategy, termed target-aligned input reparameterization (TAIR). TAIR replaces the raw enthalpy coordinate of each property network with a target-matched thermodynamic coordinate: the temperature network uses a temperature estimate obtained by inverting a constant-$c_p$ ideal-gas mixture enthalpy approximation, whereas the density and compressibility networks use an ideal-gas density estimate. These algebraic transformations use only solver-available variables and species constants, guiding the networks to learn real-fluid departures from ideal-gas baselines rather than reconstructing the full closure from raw enthalpy. The method is assessed using supercritical methane-oxygen counterflow flame data against a raw-input baseline and target-inconsistent cross-reparameterization controls. TAIR reduces held-out RMSE by factors of about 1.5, 2.0, and 7.5 for T, $ρ$, and $ψ$, respectively. For an unseen strain-rate flame within the augmented thermodynamic envelope, the corresponding factors are 3.6, 14.5, and 6.0. The target-inconsistent controls perform worse, indicating that the gains arise from thermodynamically matched input design rather than generic preprocessing.

Benchmarking neural surrogates on realistic spatiotemporal multiphysics flows

Predicting multiphysics dynamics is computationally expensive and challenging due to the severe coupling of multi-scale, heterogeneous physical processes. While neural surrogates promise a paradigm shift, the field currently suffers from an "illusion of mastery", as repeatedly emphasized in top-tier commentaries: existing evaluations overly rely on simplified, low-dimensional proxies, which fail to expose the models' inherent fragility in realistic regimes. To bridge this critical gap, we present REALM (REalistic AI Learning for Multiphysics), a rigorous benchmarking framework designed to test neural surrogates on challenging, application-driven reactive flows. REALM features 11 high-fidelity datasets spanning from canonical multiphysics problems to complex propulsion and fire safety scenarios, alongside a standardized end-to-end training and evaluation protocol that incorporates multiphysics-aware preprocessing and a robust rollout strategy. Using this framework, we systematically benchmark over a dozen representative surrogate model families, including spectral operators, convolutional models, Transformers, pointwise operators, and graph/mesh networks, and identify three robust trends: (i) a scaling barrier governed jointly by dimensionality, stiffness, and mesh irregularity, leading to rapidly growing rollout errors; (ii) performance primarily controlled by architectural inductive biases rather than parameter count; and (iii) a persistent gap between nominal accuracy metrics and physically trustworthy behavior, where models with high correlations still miss key transient structures and integral quantities. Taken together, REALM exposes the limits of current neural surrogates on realistic multiphysics flows and offers a rigorous testbed to drive the development of next-generation physics-aware architectures.