AttributionScanner: A Visual Analytics System for Metadata-Free Data-Slicing Based Model Validation

Data slice-finding is an emerging technique for evaluating machine learning models. It works by identifying subgroups within a specified dataset that exhibit poor performance, often defined by distinct feature sets or meta-information. However, in the context of unstructured image data, data slice-finding poses two notable challenges: it requires additional metadata -- a laborious and costly requirement, and also demands non-trivial efforts for interpreting the root causes of the underperformance within data slices. To address these challenges, we introduce AttributionScanner, an innovative human-in-the-loop Visual Analytics (VA) system, designed for data-slicing-based machine learning (ML) model validation. Our approach excels in identifying interpretable data slices, employing explainable features extracted through the lens of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, and removing the necessity for additional metadata of textual annotations or cross-model embeddings. AttributionScanner demonstrates proficiency in pinpointing critical model issues, including spurious correlations and mislabeled data. Our novel VA interface visually summarizes data slices, enabling users to gather insights into model behavior patterns effortlessly. Furthermore, our framework closes the ML Development Cycle by empowering domain experts to address model issues by using a cutting-edge neural network regularization technique. The efficacy of AttributionScanner is underscored through two prototype use cases, elucidating its substantial effectiveness in model validation for vision-centric tasks. Our approach paves the way for ML researchers and practitioners to drive interpretable model validation in a data-efficient way, ultimately leading to more reliable and accurate models.

SUNY: A Visual Interpretation Framework for Convolutional Neural Networks from a Necessary and Sufficient Perspective

Researchers have proposed various methods for visually interpreting the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) via saliency maps, which include Class-Activation-Map (CAM) based approaches as a leading family. However, in terms of the internal design logic, existing CAM-based approaches often overlook the causal perspective that answers the core "why" question to help humans understand the explanation. Additionally, current CNN explanations lack the consideration of both necessity and sufficiency, two complementary sides of a desirable explanation. This paper presents a causality-driven framework, SUNY, designed to rationalize the explanations toward better human understanding. Using the CNN model's input features or internal filters as hypothetical causes, SUNY generates explanations by bi-directional quantifications on both the necessary and sufficient perspectives. Extensive evaluations justify that SUNY not only produces more informative and convincing explanations from the angles of necessity and sufficiency, but also achieves performances competitive to other approaches across different CNN architectures over large-scale datasets, including ILSVRC2012 and CUB-200-2011.

CNNC: A Visual Analytics System for Comparative Studies of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

The rapid development of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in recent years has triggered significant breakthroughs in many machine learning (ML) applications. The ability to understand and compare various CNN models available is thus essential. The conventional approach with visualizing each model's quantitative features, such as classification accuracy and computational complexity, is not sufficient for a deeper understanding and comparison of the behaviors of different models. Moreover, most of the existing tools for assessing CNN behaviors only support comparison between two models and lack the flexibility of customizing the analysis tasks according to user needs. This paper presents a visual analytics system, CNN Comparator (CNNC), that supports the in-depth inspection of a single CNN model as well as comparative studies of two or more models. The ability to compare a larger number of (e.g., tens of) models especially distinguishes our system from previous ones. With a carefully designed model visualization and explaining support, CNNC facilitates a highly interactive workflow that promptly presents both quantitative and qualitative information at each analysis stage. We demonstrate CNNC's effectiveness for assisting ML practitioners in evaluating and comparing multiple CNN models through two use cases and one preliminary evaluation study using the image classification tasks on the ImageNet dataset.