What Do They See? Interpreting Complex Road Scenarios Through the Eyes of Vision-Language-Action Models for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Vehicle Learning

End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems remains largely opaque, due to the complexity of traffic scenes. We propose a counterfactual ablation framework called Counterfactual Vision Action Analysis (CVAA) that systematically removes individual detected objects from front-camera images using photorealistic generative inpainting to prepare counterfactual sets to evaluate the difference in the model's response. This isolates the causal effect of each object's presence on the model's planning behaviour. Applied to the Alpamayo 1 trajectory predictor across 210 nuScenes driving scenes, we create a dataset Counter -nuScenes, using which we see that vehicles and pedestrians within the model's 'path' dominate causal influence as expected, while traffic lights, as expected, exert disproportionate effect relative to their image footprint. However, we also find cases where the model responds strongly to objects a human driver would consider irrelevant. This brings forth a deeper question: does the model itself view the scene as a sum of individual objects influencing the outcome, or does it encode an entirely different set of internal features that do not correspond to human-legible scene elements? To further understand this, we compare intermediate representations of original and inpainted image pairs using mechanistic interpretability techniques and examine the effect of the removal through the various model layers. Together, these two stages offer a path from behavioral auditing to representational understanding, creating explainable driving systems and solidifying human-AI trust.

Vision-Language Work Zone Intelligence for Safety-Critical Speed Regulation of Mixed-Autonomy Vehicles in Dynamic Environments

Temporary work-zone speed limits are communicated through visually inconsistent signage and are often missing from digital maps, creating safety risks for human drivers and automated vehicle systems. We present a real-time, onboard perception pipeline that detects active work zones, recognizes associated temporary speed limits, and outputs a law-aware work-zone state and speed value suitable for driver alerts or downstream automated control. The system fuses object detections with semantic verification and temporally smoothed, hysteresis-based state transitions to reduce false activations and flicker in dynamic scenes, and runs fully on low-cost embedded hardware. Evaluated manually on a annotated subset of the ROADWork dataset (490 sequences), the system achieves inside-work-zone event-level recall of 96.5% and event-level precision of 68.7%. Speed-limit recognition evaluated on 35 minutes of in-house driving data attains 95.45% precision and 53.85% recall, with no incorrect speed classifications and a single false positive. These results demonstrate a practical, scalable approach for grounding work-zone speed awareness directly in onboard perception rather than maps or infrastructure. We release our source code for the proposed system pipeline on our GitHub repository: https://github.com/Mi3-Lab/workzone