LitSim: Conflict-aware Policy for Long-term Interactive Traffic Simulation

Simulation is pivotal in evaluating the performance of autonomous driving systems due to the advantages in efficiency and cost compared to on-road testing. Realistic multi-agent behavior~(e.g., interactive and long-term) is needed to narrow the gap between the simulation and the reality. The existing work has the following shortcomings in achieving this goal:~(1) log replay offers realistic scenarios but leads to unrealistic collisions due to lacking dynamic interactions, and~(2) model-based and learning-based solutions encourage interactions but often deviate from real-world data in long horizons. In this work, we propose LitSim, a long-term interactive simulation approach that maximizes realism while avoiding unrealistic collisions. Specifically, we replay the log for most scenarios and intervene only when LitSim predicts unrealistic conflicts. We then encourage interactions among the agents and resolve the conflicts, thereby reducing the likelihood of unrealistic collisions. We train and validate our model on the real-world dataset NGSIM, and the experimental results demonstrate that LitSim outperforms the current popular approaches in realism and reactivity.

Bridging Data-Driven and Knowledge-Driven Approaches for Safety-Critical Scenario Generation in Automated Vehicle Validation

Automated driving vehicles~(ADV) promise to enhance driving efficiency and safety, yet they face intricate challenges in safety-critical scenarios. As a result, validating ADV within generated safety-critical scenarios is essential for both development and performance evaluations. This paper investigates the complexities of employing two major scenario-generation solutions: data-driven and knowledge-driven methods. Data-driven methods derive scenarios from recorded datasets, efficiently generating scenarios by altering the existing behavior or trajectories of traffic participants but often falling short in considering ADV perception; knowledge-driven methods provide effective coverage through expert-designed rules, but they may lead to inefficiency in generating safety-critical scenarios within that coverage. To overcome these challenges, we introduce BridgeGen, a safety-critical scenario generation framework, designed to bridge the benefits of both methodologies. Specifically, by utilizing ontology-based techniques, BridgeGen models the five scenario layers in the operational design domain (ODD) from knowledge-driven methods, ensuring broad coverage, and incorporating data-driven strategies to efficiently generate safety-critical scenarios. An optimized scenario generation toolkit is developed within BridgeGen. This expedites the crafting of safety-critical scenarios through a combination of traditional optimization and reinforcement learning schemes. Extensive experiments conducted using Carla simulator demonstrate the effectiveness of BridgeGen in generating diverse safety-critical scenarios.