Abstract:Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated immense promise in Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding (STVG). However, current evaluation protocols are largely confined to zero-shot assessments on general, daily-life benchmarks. This creates a critical disconnect from real-world applications in specialized fields, where models inevitably encounter rare visual concepts and complex spatio-temporal dynamics. Since exhaustive pre-training across infinite data distributions is infeasible, the ability to adapt to novel domains is essential. To bridge this gap, we introduce AnyGroundBench, a domain-adaptation benchmark designed to shift the STVG evaluation paradigm from static zero-shot testing to rigorous domain adaptation. Targeting five specialized domains (animal, industry, sports, surgery, and public security), AnyGroundBench pairs newly captured videos such as expert-annotated mouse behaviors with established datasets, unifying them through dense, high-fidelity spatio-temporal annotations. Crucially, the benchmark provides dedicated training subsets to systematically measure domain adaptability. We extensively evaluate 15 state-of-the-art VLMs, assessing their zero-shot generalization and In-Context Learning (ICL) capabilities under practical computational constraints. Ultimately, our findings reveal that current models fail in both zero-shot and ICL-based adaptation when confronted with specialized domains, exposing critical flaws in spatio-temporal reasoning that future research must address.




Abstract:Evaluating concept customization is challenging, as it requires a comprehensive assessment of fidelity to generative prompts and concept images. Moreover, evaluating multiple concepts is considerably more difficult than evaluating a single concept, as it demands detailed assessment not only for each individual concept but also for the interactions among concepts. While humans can intuitively assess generated images, existing metrics often provide either overly narrow or overly generalized evaluations, resulting in misalignment with human preference. To address this, we propose Decomposed GPT Score (D-GPTScore), a novel human-aligned evaluation method that decomposes evaluation criteria into finer aspects and incorporates aspect-wise assessments using Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM). Additionally, we release Human Preference-Aligned Concept Customization Benchmark (CC-AlignBench), a benchmark dataset containing both single- and multi-concept tasks, enabling stage-wise evaluation across a wide difficulty range -- from individual actions to multi-person interactions. Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches on this benchmark, exhibiting higher correlation with human preferences. This work establishes a new standard for evaluating concept customization and highlights key challenges for future research. The benchmark and associated materials are available at https://github.com/ReinaIshikawa/D-GPTScore.




Abstract:Acoustic and visual sensing can support the contactless estimation of the weight of a container and the amount of its content when the container is manipulated by a person. However, transparencies (both of the container and of the content) and the variability of materials, shapes and sizes make this problem challenging. In this paper, we present an open benchmarking framework and an in-depth comparative analysis of recent methods that estimate the capacity of a container, as well as the type, mass, and amount of its content. These methods use learned and handcrafted features, such as mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients, zero-crossing rate, spectrograms, with different types of classifiers to estimate the type and amount of the content with acoustic data, and geometric approaches with visual data to determine the capacity of the container. Results on a newly distributed dataset show that audio alone is a strong modality and methods achieves a weighted average F1-score up to 81% and 97% for content type and level classification, respectively. Estimating the container capacity with vision-only approaches and filling mass with multi-modal, multi-stage algorithms reaches up to 65% weighted average capacity and mass scores.