When Memory Becomes Authority: Benchmarking Authority Collapse at the Memory Consolidation Boundary

Persistent memory allows (self-evolving) LLM agents to adapt across tasks by consolidating heterogeneous interaction histories into reusable facts, preferences, observations, and rules. Yet consolidation also imposes an implicit authorization boundary: it determines whether stored information may later be consumed as a user fact, an attested observation, or a standing instruction. We identify authority collapse, in which consolidation preserves a claim while erasing the source constraints governing its authorized use, causing the stored memory to imply greater authority than its source permits. We introduce AuthMem-Bench, a controlled paired benchmark that holds the focal claim and downstream task fixed while varying only source authority. It evaluates write-time collapse, downstream authorization errors, and automatic authority preservation. Across seven consolidators based on widely used agent-memory systems and seven LLM backbones, we observe authority collapse in 48 of 49 evaluated configurations. In a controlled action-grounded evaluation, collapsed memories without authority metadata yield a mean unauthorized-action rate of 50.3%. In an end-to-end evaluation, automatically predicted and persisted authority labels reduce the observed unauthorized-action rate from 16.9% to 0.0%, while benign task success remains essentially unchanged. These findings show that memory-driven adaptation must preserve not only what was learned, but also the authority under which it may be reused.

Blind Gods and Broken Screens: Architecting a Secure, Intent-Centric Mobile Agent Operating System

The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has shifted mobile computing from App-centric interactions to system-level autonomous agents. Current implementations predominantly rely on a "Screen-as-Interface" paradigm, which inherits structural vulnerabilities and conflicts with the mobile ecosystem's economic foundations. In this paper, we conduct a systematic security analysis of state-of-the-art mobile agents using Doubao Mobile Assistant as a representative case. We decompose the threat landscape into four dimensions - Agent Identity, External Interface, Internal Reasoning, and Action Execution - revealing critical flaws such as fake App identity, visual spoofing, indirect prompt injection, and unauthorized privilege escalation stemming from a reliance on unstructured visual data. To address these challenges, we propose Aura, an Agent Universal Runtime Architecture for a clean-slate secure agent OS. Aura replaces brittle GUI scraping with a structured, agent-native interaction model. It adopts a Hub-and-Spoke topology where a privileged System Agent orchestrates intent, sandboxed App Agents execute domain-specific tasks, and the Agent Kernel mediates all communication. The Agent Kernel enforces four defense pillars: (i) cryptographic identity binding via a Global Agent Registry; (ii) semantic input sanitization through a multilayer Semantic Firewall; (iii) cognitive integrity via taint-aware memory and plan-trajectory alignment; and (iv) granular access control with non-deniable auditing. Evaluation on MobileSafetyBench shows that, compared to Doubao, Aura improves low-risk Task Success Rate from roughly 75% to 94.3%, reduces high-risk Attack Success Rate from roughly 40% to 4.4%, and achieves near-order-of-magnitude latency gains. These results demonstrate Aura as a viable, secure alternative to the "Screen-as-Interface" paradigm.