Specializing Foundation Models via Mixture of Low-Rank Experts for Comprehensive Head CT Analysis

Foundation models pre-trained on large-scale datasets demonstrate strong transfer learning capabilities; however, their adaptation to complex multi-label diagnostic tasks-such as comprehensive head CT finding detection-remains understudied. Standard parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA apply uniform adaptations across pathology types, which may limit performance for diverse medical findings. We propose a Mixture of Low-Rank Experts (MoLRE) framework that extends LoRA with multiple specialized low-rank adapters and unsupervised soft routing. This approach enables conditional feature adaptation with less than 0.5% additional parameters and without explicit pathology supervision. We present a comprehensive benchmark of MoLRE across six state-of-the-art medical imaging foundation models spanning 2D and 3D architectures, general-domain, medical-domain, and head CT-specific pretraining, and model sizes ranging from 7M to 431M parameters. Using over 70,000 non-contrast head CT scans with 75 annotated findings-including hemorrhage, infarction, trauma, mass lesions, structural abnormalities, and chronic changes-our experiments demonstrate consistent performance improvements across all models. Gains vary substantially: general-purpose and medical-domain models show the largest improvements (DINOv3-Base: +4.6%; MedGemma: +4.3%), whereas 3D CT-specialized or very large models show more modest gains (+0.2-1.3%). The combination of MoLRE and MedGemma achieves the highest average detection AUC of 0.917. These findings highlight the importance of systematic benchmarking on target clinical tasks, as pretraining domain, architecture, and model scale interact in non-obvious ways.

A Non-contrast Head CT Foundation Model for Comprehensive Neuro-Trauma Triage

Recent advancements in AI and medical imaging offer transformative potential in emergency head CT interpretation for reducing assessment times and improving accuracy in the face of an increasing request of such scans and a global shortage in radiologists. This study introduces a 3D foundation model for detecting diverse neuro-trauma findings with high accuracy and efficiency. Using large language models (LLMs) for automatic labeling, we generated comprehensive multi-label annotations for critical conditions. Our approach involved pretraining neural networks for hemorrhage subtype segmentation and brain anatomy parcellation, which were integrated into a pretrained comprehensive neuro-trauma detection network through multimodal fine-tuning. Performance evaluation against expert annotations and comparison with CT-CLIP demonstrated strong triage accuracy across major neuro-trauma findings, such as hemorrhage and midline shift, as well as less frequent critical conditions such as cerebral edema and arterial hyperdensity. The integration of neuro-specific features significantly enhanced diagnostic capabilities, achieving an average AUC of 0.861 for 16 neuro-trauma conditions. This work advances foundation models in medical imaging, serving as a benchmark for future AI-assisted neuro-trauma diagnostics in emergency radiology.

General-Purpose vs. Domain-Adapted Large Language Models for Extraction of Data from Thoracic Radiology Reports

Radiologists produce unstructured data that could be valuable for clinical care when consumed by information systems. However, variability in style limits usage. Study compares performance of system using domain-adapted language model (RadLing) and general-purpose large language model (GPT-4) in extracting common data elements (CDE) from thoracic radiology reports. Three radiologists annotated a retrospective dataset of 1300 thoracic reports (900 training, 400 test) and mapped to 21 pre-selected relevant CDEs. RadLing was used to generate embeddings for sentences and identify CDEs using cosine-similarity, which were mapped to values using light-weight mapper. GPT-4 system used OpenAI's general-purpose embeddings to identify relevant CDEs and used GPT-4 to map to values. The output CDE:value pairs were compared to the reference standard; an identical match was considered true positive. Precision (positive predictive value) was 96% (2700/2824) for RadLing and 99% (2034/2047) for GPT-4. Recall (sensitivity) was 94% (2700/2876) for RadLing and 70% (2034/2887) for GPT-4; the difference was statistically significant (P<.001). RadLing's domain-adapted embeddings were more sensitive in CDE identification (95% vs 71%) and its light-weight mapper had comparable precision in value assignment (95.4% vs 95.0%). RadLing system exhibited higher performance than GPT-4 system in extracting CDEs from radiology reports. RadLing system's domain-adapted embeddings outperform general-purpose embeddings from OpenAI in CDE identification and its light-weight value mapper achieves comparable precision to large GPT-4. RadLing system offers operational advantages including local deployment and reduced runtime costs. Domain-adapted RadLing system surpasses GPT-4 system in extracting common data elements from radiology reports, while providing benefits of local deployment and lower costs.